MedTok or MythTok? Classifying Health Misinformation on TikTok with AI.

Elisavet Andrikopoulou, Nicholas Talam, Aikaterini Kanta
{"title":"MedTok or MythTok? Classifying Health Misinformation on TikTok with AI.","authors":"Elisavet Andrikopoulou, Nicholas Talam, Aikaterini Kanta","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social media platforms such as TikTok are increasingly used to access health information, particularly among younger and digitally connected populations. However, the unregulated nature of this content raises concerns about medical misinformation. This study applied an AI-assisted framework to evaluate the clinical accuracy of 619 TikTok transcripts related to diabetic foot care, using authoritative guidelines from the ADA, IWGDF, and IDSA. Findings show that while some videos convey partially accurate information, over 42% contained misleading or false claims, including advice that could delay treatment or worsen outcomes. Semantic analysis highlighted a prevailing focus on complications and amputation, with minimal attention given to preventive care and early intervention. These results underline the pressing need to address misinformation and promote responsible digital health education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media platforms such as TikTok are increasingly used to access health information, particularly among younger and digitally connected populations. However, the unregulated nature of this content raises concerns about medical misinformation. This study applied an AI-assisted framework to evaluate the clinical accuracy of 619 TikTok transcripts related to diabetic foot care, using authoritative guidelines from the ADA, IWGDF, and IDSA. Findings show that while some videos convey partially accurate information, over 42% contained misleading or false claims, including advice that could delay treatment or worsen outcomes. Semantic analysis highlighted a prevailing focus on complications and amputation, with minimal attention given to preventive care and early intervention. These results underline the pressing need to address misinformation and promote responsible digital health education.

MedTok还是MythTok?用人工智能对TikTok上的健康错误信息进行分类。
TikTok等社交媒体平台越来越多地被用来获取健康信息,尤其是在年轻人和数字连接人群中。然而,这些内容不受监管的性质引起了人们对医疗错误信息的担忧。本研究采用ai辅助框架,使用ADA、IWGDF和IDSA的权威指南,评估了619份与糖尿病足部护理相关的TikTok转录本的临床准确性。调查结果显示,虽然一些视频传达了部分准确的信息,但超过42%的视频包含误导性或虚假声明,包括可能延迟治疗或恶化结果的建议。语义分析强调了对并发症和截肢的普遍关注,对预防保健和早期干预的关注很少。这些结果强调了解决错误信息和促进负责任的数字健康教育的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信