Assessing Static Air Device in Mitigating Pressure Injuries: An Observation Retrospective Study.

IF 1
Leah Ajewole, Suzanne Ballard, Denise Comeaux, Michael Cunningham, Michael Hartge, Emily Trotter
{"title":"Assessing Static Air Device in Mitigating Pressure Injuries: An Observation Retrospective Study.","authors":"Leah Ajewole, Suzanne Ballard, Denise Comeaux, Michael Cunningham, Michael Hartge, Emily Trotter","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This observational study aimed to evaluate the use of a static air device (SAD) to prevent worsening pressure injuries (PIs) present on admission and the development of health care-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) of the foot, heel, or ankle (FHA) within the spinal cord injury population. The central hypothesis was that SADs would significantly reduce the incidence of HAPIs and prevent the worsening of existing PIs in the FHA, where \"worsened\" was defined as no reduction in wound size, deterioration in wound bed appearance, or increase in staging severity and promote improvement, defined as a decrease in wound size, improved granulation tissue, or complete epithelialization. The hypothesis further posited that SADs would outperform traditional offloading devices (e.g., foam boots, pillows) in reducing PI incidence and promoting healing due to their ergonomic design, temperature regulation, and patient comfort.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were reviewed for 12 months using our existing pressure relief protocol in our 179-bed inpatient rehabilitation hospital. These data included existing PIs and HAPIs of the FHA. Comparison data were reviewed retrospectively for a 6-month post-period, where SADs were added to the pressure relief protocol from a 24-bed unit. We used comparative analysis to calculate HAPI rates per patient day and the rate of the same or worsened PIs present on admission post-implementation of SAD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data indicate an improvement in the rate of HAPIs per patient day and prevention of worsening of existing PIs. Implementing SADs significantly reduced the incidence of FHA pressure injuries.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance to the practice of rehabilitation nursing: </strong>This study compared the SAD device with alternatives previously used at our rehabilitation hospital. Pressure injuries cause pain, discomfort, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. Rehabilitation nurses should continue to explore new avenues for PI prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate the benefit of using SADs for PI prevention and treatment of the FHA PIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94188,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This observational study aimed to evaluate the use of a static air device (SAD) to prevent worsening pressure injuries (PIs) present on admission and the development of health care-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) of the foot, heel, or ankle (FHA) within the spinal cord injury population. The central hypothesis was that SADs would significantly reduce the incidence of HAPIs and prevent the worsening of existing PIs in the FHA, where "worsened" was defined as no reduction in wound size, deterioration in wound bed appearance, or increase in staging severity and promote improvement, defined as a decrease in wound size, improved granulation tissue, or complete epithelialization. The hypothesis further posited that SADs would outperform traditional offloading devices (e.g., foam boots, pillows) in reducing PI incidence and promoting healing due to their ergonomic design, temperature regulation, and patient comfort.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study.

Methods: Data were reviewed for 12 months using our existing pressure relief protocol in our 179-bed inpatient rehabilitation hospital. These data included existing PIs and HAPIs of the FHA. Comparison data were reviewed retrospectively for a 6-month post-period, where SADs were added to the pressure relief protocol from a 24-bed unit. We used comparative analysis to calculate HAPI rates per patient day and the rate of the same or worsened PIs present on admission post-implementation of SAD.

Results: The data indicate an improvement in the rate of HAPIs per patient day and prevention of worsening of existing PIs. Implementing SADs significantly reduced the incidence of FHA pressure injuries.

Clinical relevance to the practice of rehabilitation nursing: This study compared the SAD device with alternatives previously used at our rehabilitation hospital. Pressure injuries cause pain, discomfort, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. Rehabilitation nurses should continue to explore new avenues for PI prevention.

Conclusions: The results indicate the benefit of using SADs for PI prevention and treatment of the FHA PIs.

评估静态空气装置减轻压力伤害:一项观察性回顾性研究。
目的:本观察性研究旨在评估静态空气装置(SAD)的使用,以防止入院时出现的压力损伤(pi)恶化,以及脊髓损伤人群中足部、脚跟或踝关节(FHA)的卫生保健获得性压力损伤(HAPIs)的发展。中心假设是,SADs可以显著降低hapi的发生率,并防止FHA中现有pi的恶化,其中“恶化”定义为伤口大小没有减少,伤口床外观恶化,或分期严重程度增加,并促进改善,定义为伤口大小减少,肉芽组织改善或完全上皮化。该假设进一步假设,由于其符合人体工程学的设计、温度调节和患者舒适度,SADs在减少PI发生率和促进愈合方面优于传统的卸载设备(如泡沫靴、枕头)。设计:回顾性观察队列研究。方法:对我院179张床位的住院康复医院采用现有减压方案的12个月数据进行回顾。这些数据包括房管局现有的指数和指数。回顾性回顾了6个月后的比较数据,其中在24床单位的减压方案中添加了SADs。我们使用比较分析来计算每个患者每天的HAPI率和实施SAD后入院时相同或恶化的pi率。结果:数据表明,每个患者每天的hapi率有所改善,并预防了现有pi的恶化。实施SADs可显著降低FHA压力损伤的发生率。与康复护理实践的临床相关性:本研究将SAD装置与我们康复医院以前使用的替代装置进行了比较。压伤会导致疼痛、不适、住院时间延长和费用增加。康复护理人员应继续探索PI预防的新途径。结论:应用SADs预防和治疗FHA PI有一定的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信