Interdisciplinary Process Improvement for Behavior Management of Acute Brain Injury.

IF 1
Christina M Derbidge, Christine M Mullen, Tyler Christensen, Madison A Niermeyer, Kate Trimm, Lexi DeWolf, Josi Skiby
{"title":"Interdisciplinary Process Improvement for Behavior Management of Acute Brain Injury.","authors":"Christina M Derbidge, Christine M Mullen, Tyler Christensen, Madison A Niermeyer, Kate Trimm, Lexi DeWolf, Josi Skiby","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), 70% or more of patients display disruptive behaviors including verbal or physical aggression, wandering, nonadherence or care refusal, social withdrawal, and socially inappropriate behavior. These behaviors often worsen over the first few years after a TBI and place a significant strain on caring relationships.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our brain injury program aimed to refine our inpatient rehabilitation programming approach, using the evidence base and provider expertise, to address disruptive behaviors among patients with TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We formed an interdisciplinary committee, conducted one-on-one interviews and surveys, and participated in staff meetings. We based interventions on the premise that our TBI patients in the early stages of recovery required consistent environmental and interactional changes maintained by all members of the interdisciplinary team. We illustrate this approach with a case example.</p><p><strong>Findings and conclusions: </strong>Our approach led to increased evidence-based behavior tracking, new health care assistant and nurse training, and improved team communication. Training was well received. Self-reported knowledge increased for all learners [t (119)=-7.36, p<.001]. We saw increased event reporting on challenging behaviors, suggesting improved awareness of the need and opportunity for intervention. The Oversight Committee also received positive feedback about improved collaboration across disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94188,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following a traumatic brain injury (TBI), 70% or more of patients display disruptive behaviors including verbal or physical aggression, wandering, nonadherence or care refusal, social withdrawal, and socially inappropriate behavior. These behaviors often worsen over the first few years after a TBI and place a significant strain on caring relationships.

Purpose: Our brain injury program aimed to refine our inpatient rehabilitation programming approach, using the evidence base and provider expertise, to address disruptive behaviors among patients with TBI.

Methods: We formed an interdisciplinary committee, conducted one-on-one interviews and surveys, and participated in staff meetings. We based interventions on the premise that our TBI patients in the early stages of recovery required consistent environmental and interactional changes maintained by all members of the interdisciplinary team. We illustrate this approach with a case example.

Findings and conclusions: Our approach led to increased evidence-based behavior tracking, new health care assistant and nurse training, and improved team communication. Training was well received. Self-reported knowledge increased for all learners [t (119)=-7.36, p<.001]. We saw increased event reporting on challenging behaviors, suggesting improved awareness of the need and opportunity for intervention. The Oversight Committee also received positive feedback about improved collaboration across disciplines.

急性脑损伤行为管理的跨学科过程改进。
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后,70%或更多的患者表现出破坏性行为,包括言语或身体攻击、徘徊、不遵守或拒绝护理、社交退缩和社交不当行为。这些行为通常会在创伤性脑损伤后的头几年恶化,并对关爱关系造成重大压力。目的:我们的脑损伤项目旨在完善我们的住院康复规划方法,利用证据基础和提供者专业知识,解决创伤性脑损伤患者的破坏性行为。方法:成立跨学科委员会,进行一对一访谈和问卷调查,并参加员工会议。我们基于这样的前提进行干预,即我们的TBI患者处于恢复的早期阶段,需要跨学科团队的所有成员维持一致的环境和相互作用的变化。我们用一个案例来说明这种方法。研究结果和结论:我们的方法增加了循证行为跟踪,增加了新的卫生保健助理和护士培训,并改善了团队沟通。培训很受欢迎。所有学习者自我报告的知识都有所增加[t (119)=-7.36, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信