Sinead Impey, Sinead Jordan, Linda Douris, Gaye Stephens, Lucy Hederman, Mark Heverin, Miriam Galvin, Ronan McDonnell, Frances Gibbons, Orla Hardiman
{"title":"A Proposed Feasibility Process: Lessons Learned from the Precision MS Project.","authors":"Sinead Impey, Sinead Jordan, Linda Douris, Gaye Stephens, Lucy Hederman, Mark Heverin, Miriam Galvin, Ronan McDonnell, Frances Gibbons, Orla Hardiman","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using an elaborated action design research (eADR) approach, this paper describes activities and outcomes of a feasibility study. The study explored whether a previously developed data collection tool could be used in a different setting. Two outcomes emerged. First, design requirements were identified to assess whether a second setting could adopt the current tool. Second, while feasibility studies are widely discussed in the literature, the process of conducting them remains less well-defined. Lessons learned outline a proposed feasibility process. The authors believe this process could be valuable for projects that wish to adopt developed technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"268-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Using an elaborated action design research (eADR) approach, this paper describes activities and outcomes of a feasibility study. The study explored whether a previously developed data collection tool could be used in a different setting. Two outcomes emerged. First, design requirements were identified to assess whether a second setting could adopt the current tool. Second, while feasibility studies are widely discussed in the literature, the process of conducting them remains less well-defined. Lessons learned outline a proposed feasibility process. The authors believe this process could be valuable for projects that wish to adopt developed technologies.