A Proposed Feasibility Process: Lessons Learned from the Precision MS Project.

Sinead Impey, Sinead Jordan, Linda Douris, Gaye Stephens, Lucy Hederman, Mark Heverin, Miriam Galvin, Ronan McDonnell, Frances Gibbons, Orla Hardiman
{"title":"A Proposed Feasibility Process: Lessons Learned from the Precision MS Project.","authors":"Sinead Impey, Sinead Jordan, Linda Douris, Gaye Stephens, Lucy Hederman, Mark Heverin, Miriam Galvin, Ronan McDonnell, Frances Gibbons, Orla Hardiman","doi":"10.3233/SHTI251542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using an elaborated action design research (eADR) approach, this paper describes activities and outcomes of a feasibility study. The study explored whether a previously developed data collection tool could be used in a different setting. Two outcomes emerged. First, design requirements were identified to assess whether a second setting could adopt the current tool. Second, while feasibility studies are widely discussed in the literature, the process of conducting them remains less well-defined. Lessons learned outline a proposed feasibility process. The authors believe this process could be valuable for projects that wish to adopt developed technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"332 ","pages":"268-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI251542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using an elaborated action design research (eADR) approach, this paper describes activities and outcomes of a feasibility study. The study explored whether a previously developed data collection tool could be used in a different setting. Two outcomes emerged. First, design requirements were identified to assess whether a second setting could adopt the current tool. Second, while feasibility studies are widely discussed in the literature, the process of conducting them remains less well-defined. Lessons learned outline a proposed feasibility process. The authors believe this process could be valuable for projects that wish to adopt developed technologies.

建议的可行性过程:精密质谱项目的经验教训。
采用详细的行动设计研究(eADR)方法,本文描述了可行性研究的活动和结果。该研究探讨了以前开发的数据收集工具是否可以在不同的环境中使用。出现了两种结果。首先,确定了设计要求,以评估第二种设置是否可以采用当前工具。其次,虽然可行性研究在文献中被广泛讨论,但进行可行性研究的过程仍然不太明确。经验教训概述了拟议的可行性过程。作者认为,这个过程对于希望采用已开发技术的项目是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信