{"title":"Women With Gynecologic Cancers: Screening for Substance Use Disorders Is Key.","authors":"Lindsay Shor, Kathryn Trotter","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.5.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substance use disorders (SUDs) among women with gynecologic cancers pose challenges to treatment adherence, patient well-being, morbidity, and mortality. Despite the prevalence of SUDs, routine screening practices have not been widely adopted. This quality improvement project implemented the Revised Opioid Risk Tool (ORT-OUD) to screen for SUDs among gynecologic oncology patients. The aims were to provide a referral to addiction psychiatry in a minimum of 80% of patients who screened as high risk and demonstrate the feasibility of ORT-OUD implementation in clinical practice, with at least 75% of advanced practice providers (APPs) reporting it as feasible. The ORT-OUD was offered to all patients aged 18 years or older, consented, and were on the APPs' schedules during the project implementation period (3 months). Patients completed the ORT-OUD privately, and APPs reviewed and scored the tool. Patients with scores of 3 or higher were offered a referral to addiction psychiatry. Advanced practice providers were then given a survey to assess their perception of the project's feasibility. Descriptive statistics were used to track referral rates and APP perceptions. Of 134 patients screened, 9.7% were identified as high risk for SUDs. Of those patients, 76.9% accepted a referral to addiction psychiatry. One hundred percent of APPs reported the ORT-OUD implementation as feasible. Challenges identified included time needed to explain the screening tool and patients' perceptions of the screening tool questions. This project successfully identified a proportion of gynecologic oncology patients at risk for SUDs and facilitated access to specialized care. Challenges in the screening process highlight the importance of patient education and communication strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":"16 5","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487833/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.5.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUDs) among women with gynecologic cancers pose challenges to treatment adherence, patient well-being, morbidity, and mortality. Despite the prevalence of SUDs, routine screening practices have not been widely adopted. This quality improvement project implemented the Revised Opioid Risk Tool (ORT-OUD) to screen for SUDs among gynecologic oncology patients. The aims were to provide a referral to addiction psychiatry in a minimum of 80% of patients who screened as high risk and demonstrate the feasibility of ORT-OUD implementation in clinical practice, with at least 75% of advanced practice providers (APPs) reporting it as feasible. The ORT-OUD was offered to all patients aged 18 years or older, consented, and were on the APPs' schedules during the project implementation period (3 months). Patients completed the ORT-OUD privately, and APPs reviewed and scored the tool. Patients with scores of 3 or higher were offered a referral to addiction psychiatry. Advanced practice providers were then given a survey to assess their perception of the project's feasibility. Descriptive statistics were used to track referral rates and APP perceptions. Of 134 patients screened, 9.7% were identified as high risk for SUDs. Of those patients, 76.9% accepted a referral to addiction psychiatry. One hundred percent of APPs reported the ORT-OUD implementation as feasible. Challenges identified included time needed to explain the screening tool and patients' perceptions of the screening tool questions. This project successfully identified a proportion of gynecologic oncology patients at risk for SUDs and facilitated access to specialized care. Challenges in the screening process highlight the importance of patient education and communication strategies.