Drivers of Hematology and Oncology Care Team Staff Satisfaction.

Rachel A Eiring, Jamie L Carroll, Amber N Derr, Christopher J Gosselin, Amy J Jasik, Robin R Klebig, Robert R McWilliams, Adam S Resnick
{"title":"Drivers of Hematology and Oncology Care Team Staff Satisfaction.","authors":"Rachel A Eiring, Jamie L Carroll, Amber N Derr, Christopher J Gosselin, Amy J Jasik, Robin R Klebig, Robert R McWilliams, Adam S Resnick","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores drivers of satisfaction in modern care teams in which clinical and support staff are fragmented between work locations and communication methods with a large workload of digital messages. It explores the association of team culture, communication, perceived staffing, and work location on team satisfaction in an outpatient hematology and oncology practice at a large academic medical center. Clinic observation sessions and interviews with clinicians were conducted to identify potential drivers of staff satisfaction. Subsequently, a 21-question survey was developed to assess drivers correlated with care team staff satisfaction. The anonymous survey was sent to clinical and non-clinical staff. A total of 586 staff received the survey, and 278 (47%) completed the survey. Team culture/collaboration, ability to get information, and sufficient staffing were associated with high team satisfaction. Team culture/collaboration was most correlated with an individual's team satisfaction. Clinicians who spent time in a shared team workspace had 21 percentage points higher overall satisfaction. Clinicians preferred in-person communication while support staff preferred asynchronous messaging. This study highlights the importance of building team culture for strong staff satisfaction. Practices should consider colocation of clinical teams within a shared workroom space to improve satisfaction. Colocation may be a way to support positive team culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores drivers of satisfaction in modern care teams in which clinical and support staff are fragmented between work locations and communication methods with a large workload of digital messages. It explores the association of team culture, communication, perceived staffing, and work location on team satisfaction in an outpatient hematology and oncology practice at a large academic medical center. Clinic observation sessions and interviews with clinicians were conducted to identify potential drivers of staff satisfaction. Subsequently, a 21-question survey was developed to assess drivers correlated with care team staff satisfaction. The anonymous survey was sent to clinical and non-clinical staff. A total of 586 staff received the survey, and 278 (47%) completed the survey. Team culture/collaboration, ability to get information, and sufficient staffing were associated with high team satisfaction. Team culture/collaboration was most correlated with an individual's team satisfaction. Clinicians who spent time in a shared team workspace had 21 percentage points higher overall satisfaction. Clinicians preferred in-person communication while support staff preferred asynchronous messaging. This study highlights the importance of building team culture for strong staff satisfaction. Practices should consider colocation of clinical teams within a shared workroom space to improve satisfaction. Colocation may be a way to support positive team culture.

血液和肿瘤护理团队员工满意度的驱动因素。
本研究探讨了现代护理团队满意度的驱动因素,其中临床和支持人员在工作地点和大量数字信息的通信方法之间分散。本研究探讨了一家大型学术医疗中心门诊血液学和肿瘤学实践中团队文化、沟通、感知人员配备和工作地点对团队满意度的影响。临床观察会议和临床医生的访谈进行,以确定员工满意度的潜在驱动因素。随后,一项包含21个问题的调查被开发出来,以评估与护理团队员工满意度相关的驱动因素。这份匿名调查发给了临床和非临床工作人员。共有586名员工接受了调查,其中278人(47%)完成了调查。团队文化/协作、获取信息的能力和充足的人员配备与高团队满意度相关。团队文化/协作与个人的团队满意度最相关。在共享团队工作空间中工作的临床医生的总体满意度要高出21个百分点。临床医生更喜欢面对面的交流,而支持人员更喜欢异步消息传递。本研究强调了建立团队文化对于提高员工满意度的重要性。实践应考虑在共享的工作空间内安排临床团队,以提高满意度。托管可能是支持积极的团队文化的一种方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信