Causal Machine Learning Analysis of Empirical Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for Mandible Osteoradionecrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy.

ArXiv Pub Date : 2025-09-25
Jingyuan Chen, Zhong Liu, Yunze Yang, Olivia M Muller, Zhengliang Liu, Tianming Liu, Lei Zeng, Robert L Foote, Daniel J Ma, Samir H Patel, Wei Liu
{"title":"Causal Machine Learning Analysis of Empirical Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) for Mandible Osteoradionecrosis in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy.","authors":"Jingyuan Chen, Zhong Liu, Yunze Yang, Olivia M Muller, Zhengliang Liu, Tianming Liu, Lei Zeng, Robert L Foote, Daniel J Ma, Samir H Patel, Wei Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mandible Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe adverse events (AEs) for head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy. Previous retrospective investigations on real-world data relied on conventional statistical models that primarily elucidate correlation rather than establishing causal relationships. Through the novel causal machine learning, we aim to obtain empirical relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for ORN in H&N cancer patients treated with pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBSPT). 335 patients treated by PBSPT and 931 patients treated by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included. We use 1:1 case-matching to minimize the imbalance in clinical factors between PBSPT and VMAT. The bias test of standardized mean differences (SMD) was applied on the case-matched patient cohorts. The causal machine learning method, causal forest (CF), was adopted to investigate the causal effects between dosimetric factors and the incidence of ORN. The dose volume constraints (DVCs) for VMAT and PBSPT were derived based on causal effects. RBE values were further empirically derived based on tolerance curves formed from DVCs. 335 VMAT patients were case-matched to 335 PBSPT patients; however, SMD analysis revealed persistent covariate imbalances within each group, indicating residual confounding influence. Using CF modeling, we identified DVCs of mandible ORN and found that PBSPT had lower critical volumes than those of VMAT, leading to empirical RBE exceeding 1.1 in the moderate dose range (1.61 at 40 Gy[RBE=1.1], 1.30 at 50 Gy, and 1.13 at 60 Gy). This study presents a novel application of causal machine learning to evaluate mandible ORN in radiotherapy. The results indicate that proton RBE may significantly exceed 1.1 in the moderate dose range, underscoring the importance of incorporating the variable RBE into PBSPT treatment planning to mitigate the risk of ORN.</p>","PeriodicalId":93888,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mandible Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is one of the most severe adverse events (AEs) for head and neck (H&N) cancer radiotherapy. Previous retrospective investigations on real-world data relied on conventional statistical models that primarily elucidate correlation rather than establishing causal relationships. Through the novel causal machine learning, we aim to obtain empirical relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for ORN in H&N cancer patients treated with pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBSPT). 335 patients treated by PBSPT and 931 patients treated by volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) were included. We use 1:1 case-matching to minimize the imbalance in clinical factors between PBSPT and VMAT. The bias test of standardized mean differences (SMD) was applied on the case-matched patient cohorts. The causal machine learning method, causal forest (CF), was adopted to investigate the causal effects between dosimetric factors and the incidence of ORN. The dose volume constraints (DVCs) for VMAT and PBSPT were derived based on causal effects. RBE values were further empirically derived based on tolerance curves formed from DVCs. 335 VMAT patients were case-matched to 335 PBSPT patients; however, SMD analysis revealed persistent covariate imbalances within each group, indicating residual confounding influence. Using CF modeling, we identified DVCs of mandible ORN and found that PBSPT had lower critical volumes than those of VMAT, leading to empirical RBE exceeding 1.1 in the moderate dose range (1.61 at 40 Gy[RBE=1.1], 1.30 at 50 Gy, and 1.13 at 60 Gy). This study presents a novel application of causal machine learning to evaluate mandible ORN in radiotherapy. The results indicate that proton RBE may significantly exceed 1.1 in the moderate dose range, underscoring the importance of incorporating the variable RBE into PBSPT treatment planning to mitigate the risk of ORN.

头颈部肿瘤放射治疗下颌骨放射性坏死的经验相对生物学有效性(RBE)的因果机器学习分析。
下颌骨放射性骨坏死(ORN)是头颈部肿瘤放疗中最严重的不良事件(ae)之一。以前对真实世界数据的回顾性调查依赖于传统的统计模型,主要是阐明相关性,而不是建立因果关系。通过新颖的因果机器学习,我们旨在获得铅笔束扫描质子治疗(PBSPT)治疗H&N癌症患者ORN的经验相对生物学有效性(RBE)。纳入335例PBSPT治疗和931例体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)。我们使用1:1的病例匹配来最小化PBSPT和VMAT之间临床因素的不平衡。在病例匹配的患者队列中应用标准化平均差异(SMD)偏倚检验。采用因果机器学习方法因果森林(CF),探讨剂量学因素与ORN发病率之间的因果关系。VMAT和PBSPT的剂量体积约束(DVCs)是基于因果效应得出的。根据DVCs形成的容差曲线,进一步经验推导出RBE值。335例VMAT患者与335例PBSPT患者病例匹配;然而,SMD分析显示,每个组中存在持续的协变量失衡,表明残留的混杂影响。使用CF模型,我们确定了下颌骨ORN的DVCs,发现PBSPT的临界体积低于VMAT,导致经验RBE在中等剂量范围内超过1.1 (40 Gy时为1.61 [RBE=1.1], 50 Gy时为1.30,60 Gy时为1.13)。本研究提出了一种新的应用因果机器学习来评估下颌骨放射治疗中的ORN。结果表明,在中等剂量范围内,质子RBE可能显著超过1.1,强调将可变RBE纳入PBSPT治疗计划以降低ORN风险的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信