Understanding job demands and resources through network analysis: insights into workplace interconnectivity.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
E Karin, D F Gucciardi, T Rigotti, S Parker, R Kalisch, M F Crane
{"title":"Understanding job demands and resources through network analysis: insights into workplace interconnectivity.","authors":"E Karin, D F Gucciardi, T Rigotti, S Parker, R Kalisch, M F Crane","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2025.2564323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study uses network analysis to explore how job demands and resources may proliferate and interconnect within the workplace.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine how demands and resources escalate and form ecologies by mapping their interconnections within workplace dynamics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We capitalized on a large-scale cross-sectional data collection in Navy personnel preparing for deployment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected via paper-survey from 558 participants (75.8% males; M<i>age  </i>= 30.22 years). A diversity of demands and resources were measured including from distinct sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Resources were extensively and positively interconnected, consistent with the resource spirals concept. Distal resources were connected via job control and organizational-based self-esteem. In contrast, demands were more compartmentalized. Positive links between demands across domains, especially those involving interpersonal conflict, suggest that social mechanisms may underlie their interconnection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest how interconnected resources may help strengthen resource ecologies within organizations, while minimizing demand interconnectivity could reduce strain. The observed structure suggests that social factors may support the association between distinct resources (e.g., organizational-based self-esteem) or demands (i.e., interpersonal conflict), suggesting a role in resource or demand spirals. This highlights the potential role of psychological needs, particularly autonomy and relatedness, in shaping resource networks and creating more supportive workplace conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2564323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study uses network analysis to explore how job demands and resources may proliferate and interconnect within the workplace.

Objectives: To examine how demands and resources escalate and form ecologies by mapping their interconnections within workplace dynamics.

Design: We capitalized on a large-scale cross-sectional data collection in Navy personnel preparing for deployment.

Methods: Data were collected via paper-survey from 558 participants (75.8% males; Mage  = 30.22 years). A diversity of demands and resources were measured including from distinct sources.

Results: Resources were extensively and positively interconnected, consistent with the resource spirals concept. Distal resources were connected via job control and organizational-based self-esteem. In contrast, demands were more compartmentalized. Positive links between demands across domains, especially those involving interpersonal conflict, suggest that social mechanisms may underlie their interconnection.

Conclusions: These findings suggest how interconnected resources may help strengthen resource ecologies within organizations, while minimizing demand interconnectivity could reduce strain. The observed structure suggests that social factors may support the association between distinct resources (e.g., organizational-based self-esteem) or demands (i.e., interpersonal conflict), suggesting a role in resource or demand spirals. This highlights the potential role of psychological needs, particularly autonomy and relatedness, in shaping resource networks and creating more supportive workplace conditions.

通过网络分析了解工作需求和资源:对工作场所互联性的洞察。
背景:本研究使用网络分析来探讨工作需求和资源如何在工作场所内扩散和相互联系。目的:通过绘制工作场所动态中的相互联系,研究需求和资源如何升级并形成生态。设计:我们利用海军人员准备部署的大规模横断面数据收集。方法:采用问卷调查的方式收集558名参与者的资料,其中男性75.8%,年龄30.22岁。测量了需求和资源的多样性,包括来自不同来源的需求和资源。结果:资源广泛、正向联系,符合资源螺旋概念。远端资源通过工作控制和组织自尊连接。相比之下,需求则更加分散。跨领域需求之间的积极联系,特别是那些涉及人际冲突的需求,表明社会机制可能是其相互联系的基础。结论:这些发现表明,相互关联的资源如何有助于加强组织内部的资源生态,而最小化需求互联性可以减少压力。观察到的结构表明,社会因素可能支持不同资源(如基于组织的自尊)或需求(如人际冲突)之间的联系,表明在资源或需求螺旋中起作用。这突出了心理需求,特别是自主性和相关性,在形成资源网络和创造更支持性的工作环境方面的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信