US Antibiotic Importation and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mariana P Socal, Yunxiang Sun, Jeromie M Ballreich, Jennifer Dailey Lambert, Tinglong Dai, Maqbool Dada
{"title":"US Antibiotic Importation and Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.","authors":"Mariana P Socal, Yunxiang Sun, Jeromie M Ballreich, Jennifer Dailey Lambert, Tinglong Dai, Maqbool Dada","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The US has faced persistent antibiotic shortages over the past decade, compromising patient care, public health, and national security. Understanding the global sources of US antibiotic imports is critical to inform policies to improve supply chain resilience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the global sources of US antibiotic imports, focusing on finished dosage forms (FDFs) and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) between 1992 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This cross-sectional study of US antibiotic importation records used data from USA Trade Online from January 1992 to July 2024. Data included import volumes, costs, and the originating country.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Trends in annual import volumes for antibiotic FDFs and APIs (metric tons), spending and price per kilogram (inflation-adjusted dollars), and market concentration measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). An HHI less than 1500 indicates an unconcentrated (ie, competitive) market, 1500 to 2500 indicates a moderate concentration, and greater than 2500 indicates high concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final sample included 50 FDF-originating countries and 52 API-originating countries. Compared with the annual volume of US antibiotic FDF imports in 1992, the annual volume in 2024 increased 2595.0%, while the annual volume of API imports remained relatively stable. Mean inflation-adjusted importation prices for FDFs decreased from $1836.03 per kg in 1992 to $177.44 per kg in 2024. For APIs, mean prices decreased from $351.74 per kg in 2003 to $65.69 per kilogram in 2024. From 2020 to 2024, India was the leading originating country for FDFs (31.9% of the total imported volume and 18.2% of the total imported cost), followed by Italy (13.4% of the total volume and 22.4% of the total cost). China was the leading originating country for APIs (62.6% of the total imported volume and 28.7% of the total cost), followed by Bulgaria (16.1% of the total volume and 3.8% of the total cost). Italy was the originating country for 2.6% of API imported volume but accounted for 27.9% of the importation costs. HHI revealed that FDF importation has become unconcentrated since 2020 (HHI, 1500-2500), while API importation markets are highly concentrated (2024 HHI, >5000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study found that US antibiotic importation relies on diversified global sources for FDFs but primarily on China for APIs. Policies to strengthen domestic production and diversify sourcing are critical to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities. Improved traceability and targeted strategies for specific antibiotics are recommended to safeguard public health and national security.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 10","pages":"e253871"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: The US has faced persistent antibiotic shortages over the past decade, compromising patient care, public health, and national security. Understanding the global sources of US antibiotic imports is critical to inform policies to improve supply chain resilience.

Objective: To identify the global sources of US antibiotic imports, focusing on finished dosage forms (FDFs) and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) between 1992 and 2024.

Design and setting: This cross-sectional study of US antibiotic importation records used data from USA Trade Online from January 1992 to July 2024. Data included import volumes, costs, and the originating country.

Main outcomes and measures: Trends in annual import volumes for antibiotic FDFs and APIs (metric tons), spending and price per kilogram (inflation-adjusted dollars), and market concentration measured by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). An HHI less than 1500 indicates an unconcentrated (ie, competitive) market, 1500 to 2500 indicates a moderate concentration, and greater than 2500 indicates high concentration.

Results: The final sample included 50 FDF-originating countries and 52 API-originating countries. Compared with the annual volume of US antibiotic FDF imports in 1992, the annual volume in 2024 increased 2595.0%, while the annual volume of API imports remained relatively stable. Mean inflation-adjusted importation prices for FDFs decreased from $1836.03 per kg in 1992 to $177.44 per kg in 2024. For APIs, mean prices decreased from $351.74 per kg in 2003 to $65.69 per kilogram in 2024. From 2020 to 2024, India was the leading originating country for FDFs (31.9% of the total imported volume and 18.2% of the total imported cost), followed by Italy (13.4% of the total volume and 22.4% of the total cost). China was the leading originating country for APIs (62.6% of the total imported volume and 28.7% of the total cost), followed by Bulgaria (16.1% of the total volume and 3.8% of the total cost). Italy was the originating country for 2.6% of API imported volume but accounted for 27.9% of the importation costs. HHI revealed that FDF importation has become unconcentrated since 2020 (HHI, 1500-2500), while API importation markets are highly concentrated (2024 HHI, >5000).

Conclusions and relevance: This study found that US antibiotic importation relies on diversified global sources for FDFs but primarily on China for APIs. Policies to strengthen domestic production and diversify sourcing are critical to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities. Improved traceability and targeted strategies for specific antibiotics are recommended to safeguard public health and national security.

美国抗生素进口和供应链脆弱性。
重要性:在过去十年中,美国一直面临持续的抗生素短缺,危及患者护理、公共卫生和国家安全。了解美国抗生素进口的全球来源对于为提高供应链弹性的政策提供信息至关重要。目的:确定1992年至2024年间美国进口抗生素的全球来源,重点是成品剂型(fdf)和活性药物成分(api)。设计和环境:这项横断面研究使用了1992年1月至2024年7月美国贸易在线的数据,对美国抗生素进口记录进行了研究。数据包括进口量、成本和原产国。主要结果和措施:抗生素外源性药物和原料药的年度进口量趋势(公吨)、支出和每公斤价格(通货膨胀调整后的美元)以及由赫芬达尔-赫希曼指数(HHI)衡量的市场集中度。HHI低于1500表明市场不集中(即竞争激烈),1500至2500表明集中度中等,大于2500表明集中度高。结果:最终样本包括50个fdf原产国和52个api原产国。与1992年美国抗生素FDF的年进口量相比,2024年的年进口量增长了2595.0%,而原料药的年进口量保持相对稳定。经通货膨胀调整后的外国直接贸易产品平均进口价格从1992年的每公斤1836.03美元降至2024年的每公斤177.44美元。原料药的平均价格从2003年的每公斤351.74美元下降到2024年的每公斤65.69美元。从2020年到2024年,印度是fdi的主要来源国(占总进口量的31.9%和总进口成本的18.2%),其次是意大利(占总进口量的13.4%和总成本的22.4%)。中国是原料药的主要原产国(占总进口量的62.6%和总成本的28.7%),其次是保加利亚(占总进口量的16.1%和总成本的3.8%)。意大利是原产国,占原料药进口量的2.6%,但占进口成本的27.9%。HHI透露,自2020年以来,FDF进口变得不集中(HHI, 1500-2500),而原料药进口市场高度集中(2024年HHI, 5000美元)。结论和相关性:本研究发现,美国抗生素进口依赖于多样化的fdf全球来源,但主要依赖于中国原料药。加强国内生产和多样化采购的政策对于减轻供应链脆弱性至关重要。建议改进对特定抗生素的可追溯性和有针对性的战略,以保障公共卫生和国家安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信