Interpretable Artificial Intelligence to Predict Preoperative Risk Factors for Failure to Rescue after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rameshbabu Manyam, Pengfei Lou, Hong-Jui Shen, Zhanxu Liu, Yanqing Zhang, Xiao Hu, William Brent Keeling
{"title":"Interpretable Artificial Intelligence to Predict Preoperative Risk Factors for Failure to Rescue after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.","authors":"Rameshbabu Manyam, Pengfei Lou, Hong-Jui Shen, Zhanxu Liu, Yanqing Zhang, Xiao Hu, William Brent Keeling","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>Failure to rescue is a significant quality indicator for postoperative cardiothoracic care. We developed an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify, interpret, and integrate patient risk factors to predict FTR after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who underwent isolated CABG in an academic health system from 2011 to 2022 were analyzed. FTR was defined as 30-day postoperative mortality after a stroke, renal failure, reoperation, or prolonged ventilation. The study evaluated 35 patient-specific preoperative variables using 'recursive feature elimination with cross-validation' algorithm and AI methods to determine optimal set of risk factors to predict FTR. SHapley Additive exPlanations were performed to visualize and interpret models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,974 patients were identified, and the overall FTR rate was 2.5% (n=249). FTR rates were 12.9% for stroke, 24.8% for renal failure, 11.4% for reoperation, and 11.6% for prolonged ventilation. The model produced the top 12 risk factors: age, albumin, bilirubin, body mass index, creatinine, ejection fraction, hematocrit, hemoglobin, hemoglobin a1c, model for end stage liver disease score, platelets, and white blood cell count. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated good performance with an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.78.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study utilized AI algorithms to evaluate and interpret an optimal set of preoperative risk factors for FTR after CABG. The Random Forest model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying at-risk patients. The proposed framework can serve as proof-of-concept that can translate, with further research, into a real-time clinical decision support tool for at-risk patients. [247 words].</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.09.039","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective(s): Failure to rescue is a significant quality indicator for postoperative cardiothoracic care. We developed an interpretable artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify, interpret, and integrate patient risk factors to predict FTR after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: Adults who underwent isolated CABG in an academic health system from 2011 to 2022 were analyzed. FTR was defined as 30-day postoperative mortality after a stroke, renal failure, reoperation, or prolonged ventilation. The study evaluated 35 patient-specific preoperative variables using 'recursive feature elimination with cross-validation' algorithm and AI methods to determine optimal set of risk factors to predict FTR. SHapley Additive exPlanations were performed to visualize and interpret models.

Results: A total of 9,974 patients were identified, and the overall FTR rate was 2.5% (n=249). FTR rates were 12.9% for stroke, 24.8% for renal failure, 11.4% for reoperation, and 11.6% for prolonged ventilation. The model produced the top 12 risk factors: age, albumin, bilirubin, body mass index, creatinine, ejection fraction, hematocrit, hemoglobin, hemoglobin a1c, model for end stage liver disease score, platelets, and white blood cell count. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated good performance with an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.78.

Conclusions: This study utilized AI algorithms to evaluate and interpret an optimal set of preoperative risk factors for FTR after CABG. The Random Forest model demonstrated good discrimination in identifying at-risk patients. The proposed framework can serve as proof-of-concept that can translate, with further research, into a real-time clinical decision support tool for at-risk patients. [247 words].

可解释的人工智能预测冠状动脉搭桥术后抢救失败的术前危险因素。
目的:抢救失败是衡量心胸外科术后护理质量的重要指标。我们开发了一个可解释的人工智能(AI)模型来识别、解释和整合患者的危险因素,以预测冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的FTR。方法:对2011年至2022年在学术卫生系统中接受孤立性冠脉搭桥的成年人进行分析。FTR定义为卒中、肾功能衰竭、再手术或延长通气后30天的死亡率。该研究使用“交叉验证递归特征消除”算法和人工智能方法评估了35个患者特异性术前变量,以确定预测FTR的最佳风险因素集。SHapley加性解释用于可视化和解释模型。结果:共发现9974例患者,总FTR率为2.5% (n=249)。脑卒中的FTR为12.9%,肾功能衰竭为24.8%,再手术为11.4%,延长通气为11.6%。该模型产生了前12个危险因素:年龄、白蛋白、胆红素、体重指数、肌酐、射血分数、红细胞压积、血红蛋白、糖化血红蛋白、终末期肝病模型评分、血小板和白细胞计数。随机森林算法在精确召回率曲线下的面积为0.78,表现出良好的性能。结论:本研究利用人工智能算法评估和解释CABG术后FTR的一组最佳术前危险因素。随机森林模型在识别高危患者方面表现出良好的辨别能力。提出的框架可以作为概念验证,通过进一步的研究,可以转化为高危患者的实时临床决策支持工具。(247字)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信