Investigating the effects of mechanical traction and high intensity laser therapy on pain, muscle activity, and functional balance in knee osteoarthritis.
{"title":"Investigating the effects of mechanical traction and high intensity laser therapy on pain, muscle activity, and functional balance in knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Pardis Norouzi, Roya Ravanbod, Giti Torkaman","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2566935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical traction (MT) is a noninvasive approach to unload the joint in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however,its effects on co-contraction index (CCI) and balance remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether combining MT with high intensity laser therapy (HILT) yields greater improvements in subjective and objective outcomes among patients with KOA compared to HILT alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients with KOA were randomly assigned to MT+HILT (<i>n</i> = 19) or HILT (<i>n</i> = 19) groups and received 10 treatment sessions over 2 weeks. Outcomes included pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), active knee flexion range of motion (AROM), CCI, and balance during curve tracking (CT) and sit-to-stand (STS) tasks. A two-way mixed-model ANOVA was used to assess the effects of treatment and time (pre - post).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MT+HILT showed significantly greater improvements than HILT in VAS (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.27), WOMAC (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.37), and AROM (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.12). During CT, MT+HILT significantly reduced anteroposterior and mediolateral mean absolute errors (<i>p</i> = .00 and 0.03, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.10 and 0.15), and standard deviations of absolute errors (<i>p</i> = .02 and 0.04, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.82 and 0.15). Center of pressure area also decreased significantly in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions (<i>p</i> = .03 and 0.01; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.66 and 0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the combined application of MT+HILT may serve as an effective conservative strategy to improve pain management, functional capacity, AROM, and balance, potentially contributing to a reduced risk of falls in individuals with KOA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2566935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Mechanical traction (MT) is a noninvasive approach to unload the joint in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however,its effects on co-contraction index (CCI) and balance remain unclear.
Purpose: To investigate whether combining MT with high intensity laser therapy (HILT) yields greater improvements in subjective and objective outcomes among patients with KOA compared to HILT alone.
Methods: Thirty-eight patients with KOA were randomly assigned to MT+HILT (n = 19) or HILT (n = 19) groups and received 10 treatment sessions over 2 weeks. Outcomes included pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), active knee flexion range of motion (AROM), CCI, and balance during curve tracking (CT) and sit-to-stand (STS) tasks. A two-way mixed-model ANOVA was used to assess the effects of treatment and time (pre - post).
Results: The MT+HILT showed significantly greater improvements than HILT in VAS (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.27), WOMAC (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.37), and AROM (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.12). During CT, MT+HILT significantly reduced anteroposterior and mediolateral mean absolute errors (p = .00 and 0.03, ηp2 = 0.10 and 0.15), and standard deviations of absolute errors (p = .02 and 0.04, ηp2 = 0.82 and 0.15). Center of pressure area also decreased significantly in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions (p = .03 and 0.01; ηp2 = 0.66 and 0.23).
Conclusion: These findings suggest that the combined application of MT+HILT may serve as an effective conservative strategy to improve pain management, functional capacity, AROM, and balance, potentially contributing to a reduced risk of falls in individuals with KOA.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.