Investigating the effects of mechanical traction and high intensity laser therapy on pain, muscle activity, and functional balance in knee osteoarthritis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Pardis Norouzi, Roya Ravanbod, Giti Torkaman
{"title":"Investigating the effects of mechanical traction and high intensity laser therapy on pain, muscle activity, and functional balance in knee osteoarthritis.","authors":"Pardis Norouzi, Roya Ravanbod, Giti Torkaman","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2566935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical traction (MT) is a noninvasive approach to unload the joint in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however,its effects on co-contraction index (CCI) and balance remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether combining MT with high intensity laser therapy (HILT) yields greater improvements in subjective and objective outcomes among patients with KOA compared to HILT alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients with KOA were randomly assigned to MT+HILT (<i>n</i> = 19) or HILT (<i>n</i> = 19) groups and received 10 treatment sessions over 2 weeks. Outcomes included pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), active knee flexion range of motion (AROM), CCI, and balance during curve tracking (CT) and sit-to-stand (STS) tasks. A two-way mixed-model ANOVA was used to assess the effects of treatment and time (pre - post).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MT+HILT showed significantly greater improvements than HILT in VAS (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.27), WOMAC (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.37), and AROM (<i>p</i> < .001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.12). During CT, MT+HILT significantly reduced anteroposterior and mediolateral mean absolute errors (<i>p</i> = .00 and 0.03, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.10 and 0.15), and standard deviations of absolute errors (<i>p</i> = .02 and 0.04, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.82 and 0.15). Center of pressure area also decreased significantly in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions (<i>p</i> = .03 and 0.01; η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.66 and 0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the combined application of MT+HILT may serve as an effective conservative strategy to improve pain management, functional capacity, AROM, and balance, potentially contributing to a reduced risk of falls in individuals with KOA.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2566935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical traction (MT) is a noninvasive approach to unload the joint in knee osteoarthritis (KOA), however,its effects on co-contraction index (CCI) and balance remain unclear.

Purpose: To investigate whether combining MT with high intensity laser therapy (HILT) yields greater improvements in subjective and objective outcomes among patients with KOA compared to HILT alone.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients with KOA were randomly assigned to MT+HILT (n = 19) or HILT (n = 19) groups and received 10 treatment sessions over 2 weeks. Outcomes included pain (VAS), function (WOMAC), active knee flexion range of motion (AROM), CCI, and balance during curve tracking (CT) and sit-to-stand (STS) tasks. A two-way mixed-model ANOVA was used to assess the effects of treatment and time (pre - post).

Results: The MT+HILT showed significantly greater improvements than HILT in VAS (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.27), WOMAC (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.37), and AROM (p < .001, ηp2 = 0.12). During CT, MT+HILT significantly reduced anteroposterior and mediolateral mean absolute errors (p = .00 and 0.03, ηp2 = 0.10 and 0.15), and standard deviations of absolute errors (p = .02 and 0.04, ηp2 = 0.82 and 0.15). Center of pressure area also decreased significantly in anteroposterior and mediolateral directions (p = .03 and 0.01; ηp2 = 0.66 and 0.23).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the combined application of MT+HILT may serve as an effective conservative strategy to improve pain management, functional capacity, AROM, and balance, potentially contributing to a reduced risk of falls in individuals with KOA.

探讨机械牵引和高强度激光治疗对膝关节骨关节炎疼痛、肌肉活动和功能平衡的影响。
背景:机械牵引(MT)是膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)中一种无创的关节卸载方法,然而,其对共收缩指数(CCI)和平衡的影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨MT联合高强度激光治疗(HILT)在KOA患者的主观和客观预后方面是否比单独HILT有更大的改善。方法:38例KOA患者随机分为MT+HILT组(n = 19)和HILT组(n = 19),每组治疗10次,疗程2周。结果包括疼痛(VAS)、功能(WOMAC)、膝关节主动屈曲活动范围(AROM)、CCI和曲线跟踪(CT)和坐立(STS)任务中的平衡。采用双向混合模型方差分析来评估治疗和时间(前后)的影响。结果:MT+HILT对VAS (p p2 = 0.27)、WOMAC (p p2 = 0.37)、AROM (p p2 = 0.12)的改善显著高于HILT。CT时,MT+HILT可显著降低正位和中外侧平均绝对误差(p =。00和0.03,ηp2 = 0.10和0.15),绝对误差的标准偏差(p =。0.02和0.04,ηp2 = 0.82和0.15)。压力中心面积在正、中外侧方向也明显减小(p =。03和0.01;ηp2 = 0.66和0.23)。结论:这些研究结果表明,MT+HILT联合应用可能是一种有效的保守策略,可以改善疼痛管理、功能能力、AROM和平衡,可能有助于降低KOA患者跌倒的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信