[Impact of clinical simulation on improving compliance with the surgical safety checklist].

IF 1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M Corominas Iglesias, M Blasco Afonso, J Piqué-Buisan
{"title":"[Impact of clinical simulation on improving compliance with the surgical safety checklist].","authors":"M Corominas Iglesias, M Blasco Afonso, J Piqué-Buisan","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgery is a fundamental component of healthcare, with over 300 million procedures performed annually. At least half of adverse events are considered preventable through tools such as the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). However, adherence to the SSC is often incomplete. Simulation-based training offers a meaningful learning methodology that can effectively improve compliance. This study aims to evaluate the use of simulation as a strategy to increase SSC adherence at our hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, quasi-experimental quantitative intervention study, analyzing pre- and post-simulation data collected between the second half of 2021 and the second half of 2023. The target population included operating room healthcare professionals, and the SSC endorsed by the WHO was used. Clinical simulations were carried out that had been previously designed to imitate real situations in operating rooms with natural equipment and their respective post-debriefings as guided reflection for learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulation participation rates by department were as follows: 40% for Anesthesiology, 55.5% for Surgery, 75% for Orthopedics, and 76.5% for surgical nurses. The impact of the intervention was assessed by retrospectively reviewing SSC compliance before and after the simulation training. The results showed a significant increase in SSC compliance at the entry phase and during the surgical pause (P=.000), while no significant change was observed at the surgical exit phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that implementing simulation-based interventions in the operating room can enhance compliance with the Surgical Safety Checklist, thereby contributing to improved patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":" ","pages":"101166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.101166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgery is a fundamental component of healthcare, with over 300 million procedures performed annually. At least half of adverse events are considered preventable through tools such as the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC). However, adherence to the SSC is often incomplete. Simulation-based training offers a meaningful learning methodology that can effectively improve compliance. This study aims to evaluate the use of simulation as a strategy to increase SSC adherence at our hospital.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, quasi-experimental quantitative intervention study, analyzing pre- and post-simulation data collected between the second half of 2021 and the second half of 2023. The target population included operating room healthcare professionals, and the SSC endorsed by the WHO was used. Clinical simulations were carried out that had been previously designed to imitate real situations in operating rooms with natural equipment and their respective post-debriefings as guided reflection for learning.

Results: Simulation participation rates by department were as follows: 40% for Anesthesiology, 55.5% for Surgery, 75% for Orthopedics, and 76.5% for surgical nurses. The impact of the intervention was assessed by retrospectively reviewing SSC compliance before and after the simulation training. The results showed a significant increase in SSC compliance at the entry phase and during the surgical pause (P=.000), while no significant change was observed at the surgical exit phase.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that implementing simulation-based interventions in the operating room can enhance compliance with the Surgical Safety Checklist, thereby contributing to improved patient safety.

[临床模拟对提高手术安全检查表依从性的影响]。
手术是医疗保健的基本组成部分,每年有超过3亿例手术。通过手术安全检查表(SSC)等工具,至少有一半的不良事件被认为是可以预防的。然而,对SSC的遵守往往是不完整的。基于模拟的培训提供了一种有意义的学习方法,可以有效地提高依从性。本研究旨在评估在我院使用模拟作为一种策略来提高SSC的依从性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性、准实验性的定量干预研究,分析了2021年下半年至2023年下半年收集的模拟前后数据。目标人群包括手术室医护专业人员,使用世界卫生组织认可的SSC。临床模拟进行了之前的设计,以模仿手术室的真实情况,使用自然设备和各自的事后汇报,作为指导学习的反思。结果:科室模拟参与率分别为麻醉科40%、外科55.5%、骨科75%、外科护士76.5%。通过回顾模拟训练前后的SSC依从性来评估干预的影响。结果显示,进入期和手术暂停期间SSC依从性显著增加(P= 0.000),而在手术结束期未观察到显著变化。结论:研究结果表明,在手术室实施基于模拟的干预措施可以提高对《手术安全检查表》的依从性,从而有助于提高患者的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信