Development Study of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Züleyha Gürdap, Zeliha Cengiz
{"title":"Development Study of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study.","authors":"Züleyha Gürdap, Zeliha Cengiz","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale among nursing students. The scale assesses perceived competence in using medical devices and supports identifying educational needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study used an exploratory methodological design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted with 127 final-year nursing students between April and October 2023. Students completed the scale for three medical devices: a bedside monitor, an infusion pump, and a suction device. Content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while reliability was assessed through Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and test-retest methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The scale demonstrated good content validity with an index of 0.84. Exploratory factor analysis showed the scale is unidimensional with 12 items. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for each device exceeded 0.85, and the proportion of explained variance was above 65%. Factor loadings ranged from 0.602 to 0.899. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit for the hypothesized model (χ² = 103.637 to 183.4; χ²/df = 2.159 to 3.987; root mean square error of approximation = 0.065 to 0.076; goodness of fit index = 0.901 to 0.902; cognitive flexibility inventory = 0.918 to 0.957; normed fit index = 0.901 to 0.923; incremental fit index = 0.919 to 0.957). Reliability analyses showed that Cronbach's α coefficients were above 0.90, and high test-retest correlation coefficients further supported the scale's reliability (r = 0.744 to 0.795; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 12-item scale is reliable and valid for assessing nursing students' perceived competencies with medical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2025.06.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to develop and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Medical Device Self-Efficacy Scale among nursing students. The scale assesses perceived competence in using medical devices and supports identifying educational needs.

Design: The study used an exploratory methodological design.

Methods: The study was conducted with 127 final-year nursing students between April and October 2023. Students completed the scale for three medical devices: a bedside monitor, an infusion pump, and a suction device. Content validity, construct validity, and criterion validity were evaluated. Construct validity was examined through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, while reliability was assessed through Cronbach's α, item-total correlations, and test-retest methods.

Findings: The scale demonstrated good content validity with an index of 0.84. Exploratory factor analysis showed the scale is unidimensional with 12 items. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values for each device exceeded 0.85, and the proportion of explained variance was above 65%. Factor loadings ranged from 0.602 to 0.899. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good fit for the hypothesized model (χ² = 103.637 to 183.4; χ²/df = 2.159 to 3.987; root mean square error of approximation = 0.065 to 0.076; goodness of fit index = 0.901 to 0.902; cognitive flexibility inventory = 0.918 to 0.957; normed fit index = 0.901 to 0.923; incremental fit index = 0.919 to 0.957). Reliability analyses showed that Cronbach's α coefficients were above 0.90, and high test-retest correlation coefficients further supported the scale's reliability (r = 0.744 to 0.795; P < .001).

Conclusions: The 12-item scale is reliable and valid for assessing nursing students' perceived competencies with medical devices.

医疗器械自我效能量表编制研究:效度与信度研究。
目的:编制护理学生医疗器械自我效能感量表,并对其效度和信度进行评估。该量表评估使用医疗器械的感知能力,并支持确定教育需求。设计:本研究采用探索性方法学设计。方法:于2023年4月至10月对127名护理专业毕业班学生进行调查。学生们完成了三种医疗设备的量表:床边监护仪、输液泵和吸引装置。评估了内容效度、结构效度和标准效度。通过探索性和验证性因子分析检验结构效度,通过Cronbach’s α、项目-总相关和重测方法评估信度。结果:量表的内容效度为0.84。探索性因子分析显示量表具有单向度,共12个条目。各设备的Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin值均超过0.85,解释方差的比例均在65%以上。因子负荷范围为0.602 ~ 0.899。验证性因子分析表明,假设模型拟合良好(χ²= 103.637 ~ 183.4,χ²/df = 2.159 ~ 3.987,近似均方根误差= 0.065 ~ 0.076,拟合优度指数= 0.901 ~ 0.902,认知灵活性量表= 0.918 ~ 0.957,归一化拟合指数= 0.901 ~ 0.923,增量拟合指数= 0.919 ~ 0.957)。信度分析显示,Cronbach′s α系数均在0.90以上,高重测相关系数进一步支持量表的信度(r = 0.744 ~ 0.795, P < 0.001)。结论:采用12项量表评估护生对医疗器械的感知能力,信、效度高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
17.60%
发文量
279
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信