Real-world treatment adherence and persistence of FLT3 inhibitors as post-alloHCT maintenance therapy in patients with AML in the United States: a cohort study using administrative claims data.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vanessa E Kennedy, Maelys Touya, James Spalding, Christopher Young, Lingtao Frank Cao, David Nimke, Alana Block, Priti Pednekar
{"title":"Real-world treatment adherence and persistence of FLT3 inhibitors as post-alloHCT maintenance therapy in patients with AML in the United States: a cohort study using administrative claims data.","authors":"Vanessa E Kennedy, Maelys Touya, James Spalding, Christopher Young, Lingtao Frank Cao, David Nimke, Alana Block, Priti Pednekar","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2561737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In <i>FLT3-</i>mutated (<i>FLT3</i><sup>mut+</sup>) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the leading cause of treatment failure and mortality. We evaluated real-world adherence and persistence of FLT3-like-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as alloHCT maintenance in <i>FLT3</i><sup>mut+</sup> AML. Claims data were extracted from adults with AML with ≥1 alloHCT between January 2016 and June 2022 who received gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib as post-alloHCT maintenance. Adherence (PDC; days covered ≥80% during follow-up) and persistence (days receiving treatment without switch/gap >60 days) were assessed. Of 162 patients, 41, 53, and 68 received post-alloHCT gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib, respectively. Adherence was higher in patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease before alloHCT (<i>n</i> = 106 [65.4%], <i>p</i> = .021). Although this study did not focus on outcomes, no significant differences in post-alloHCT relapse by PDC were found. Discontinuation risk was higher for midostaurin (HR = 2.79, <i>p</i> = .0005) and sorafenib (HR = 1.74, <i>p</i> = .046) versus gilteritinib in patients with Commercial insurance vs Medicare/Medicaid (HR = 1.68, <i>p =</i> .019).</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2561737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the leading cause of treatment failure and mortality. We evaluated real-world adherence and persistence of FLT3-like-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as alloHCT maintenance in FLT3mut+ AML. Claims data were extracted from adults with AML with ≥1 alloHCT between January 2016 and June 2022 who received gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib as post-alloHCT maintenance. Adherence (PDC; days covered ≥80% during follow-up) and persistence (days receiving treatment without switch/gap >60 days) were assessed. Of 162 patients, 41, 53, and 68 received post-alloHCT gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib, respectively. Adherence was higher in patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease before alloHCT (n = 106 [65.4%], p = .021). Although this study did not focus on outcomes, no significant differences in post-alloHCT relapse by PDC were found. Discontinuation risk was higher for midostaurin (HR = 2.79, p = .0005) and sorafenib (HR = 1.74, p = .046) versus gilteritinib in patients with Commercial insurance vs Medicare/Medicaid (HR = 1.68, p = .019).

在美国,FLT3抑制剂作为AML患者同种异体hct后维持治疗的现实治疗依从性和持久性:一项使用行政索赔数据的队列研究。
在flt3突变(FLT3mut+)急性髓性白血病(AML)中,同种异体造血细胞移植(allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, alloHCT)后复发是治疗失败和死亡的主要原因。我们评估了flt3样酪氨酸激酶抑制剂作为flt3 + AML的同种异体hct维持的现实依从性和持久性。索赔数据来自2016年1月至2022年6月期间接受吉特替尼、米多舒林或索拉非尼作为alloHCT后维持治疗的≥1 alloHCT的AML成人患者。评估依从性(PDC;随访期间覆盖≥80%的天数)和持久性(接受无开关/间隙bb0 60天的治疗天数)。在162名患者中,分别有41名、53名和68名接受了同种异体移植后的吉特替尼、米多舒林或索拉非尼治疗。同种异体hct前有复发/难治性疾病史的患者依从性更高(n = 106 [65.4%], p = 0.021)。虽然这项研究没有关注结果,但没有发现PDC对同种异体hct后复发的显著差异。停药风险米多舒林组较高(HR = 2.79, p =。0005)和索拉非尼(HR = 1.74, p =。046)与吉尔替尼在商业保险与医疗保险/医疗补助患者中的对比(HR = 1.68, p = 0.019)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信