Real-world treatment adherence and persistence of FLT3 inhibitors as post-alloHCT maintenance therapy in patients with AML in the United States: a cohort study using administrative claims data.
Vanessa E Kennedy, Maelys Touya, James Spalding, Christopher Young, Lingtao Frank Cao, David Nimke, Alana Block, Priti Pednekar
{"title":"Real-world treatment adherence and persistence of FLT3 inhibitors as post-alloHCT maintenance therapy in patients with AML in the United States: a cohort study using administrative claims data.","authors":"Vanessa E Kennedy, Maelys Touya, James Spalding, Christopher Young, Lingtao Frank Cao, David Nimke, Alana Block, Priti Pednekar","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2025.2561737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In <i>FLT3-</i>mutated (<i>FLT3</i><sup>mut+</sup>) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the leading cause of treatment failure and mortality. We evaluated real-world adherence and persistence of FLT3-like-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as alloHCT maintenance in <i>FLT3</i><sup>mut+</sup> AML. Claims data were extracted from adults with AML with ≥1 alloHCT between January 2016 and June 2022 who received gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib as post-alloHCT maintenance. Adherence (PDC; days covered ≥80% during follow-up) and persistence (days receiving treatment without switch/gap >60 days) were assessed. Of 162 patients, 41, 53, and 68 received post-alloHCT gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib, respectively. Adherence was higher in patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease before alloHCT (<i>n</i> = 106 [65.4%], <i>p</i> = .021). Although this study did not focus on outcomes, no significant differences in post-alloHCT relapse by PDC were found. Discontinuation risk was higher for midostaurin (HR = 2.79, <i>p</i> = .0005) and sorafenib (HR = 1.74, <i>p</i> = .046) versus gilteritinib in patients with Commercial insurance vs Medicare/Medicaid (HR = 1.68, <i>p =</i> .019).</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2561737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) is the leading cause of treatment failure and mortality. We evaluated real-world adherence and persistence of FLT3-like-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as alloHCT maintenance in FLT3mut+ AML. Claims data were extracted from adults with AML with ≥1 alloHCT between January 2016 and June 2022 who received gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib as post-alloHCT maintenance. Adherence (PDC; days covered ≥80% during follow-up) and persistence (days receiving treatment without switch/gap >60 days) were assessed. Of 162 patients, 41, 53, and 68 received post-alloHCT gilteritinib, midostaurin, or sorafenib, respectively. Adherence was higher in patients with a history of relapsed/refractory disease before alloHCT (n = 106 [65.4%], p = .021). Although this study did not focus on outcomes, no significant differences in post-alloHCT relapse by PDC were found. Discontinuation risk was higher for midostaurin (HR = 2.79, p = .0005) and sorafenib (HR = 1.74, p = .046) versus gilteritinib in patients with Commercial insurance vs Medicare/Medicaid (HR = 1.68, p = .019).
期刊介绍:
Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor