Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patient Perspectives on Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Gender-Affirming Top Surgeries.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-02 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00037
Kimberly Zayhowski, Kai Blumen, Kathleen F Mittendorf, Rebekah Pratt, Carl Streed, Tala Berro, Ian M MacFarlane
{"title":"Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patient Perspectives on Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Gender-Affirming Top Surgeries.","authors":"Kimberly Zayhowski, Kai Blumen, Kathleen F Mittendorf, Rebekah Pratt, Carl Streed, Tala Berro, Ian M MacFarlane","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people have increased cancer morbidity and mortality relative to cisgender individuals. Existing breast cancer prevention guidelines fail to adequately address gender-affirming care implications, especially in the context of gender-affirming mastectomies (top surgery). Evaluation of familial and germline genetic risk before top surgery is recommended by some transgender health guidelines. This evaluation can facilitate shared surgical decision making regarding breast tissue resection extent. In this study, we use in-depth interviews with TGD people planning or having recently undergone top surgery. We aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to pre- and post-top surgery breast cancer risk assessment and screening, and the perceived utility and acceptability of presurgical genetic evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative community-engaged research through interviews with 16 TGD adults who had or were considering top surgery. Through a social constructivist lens, we used reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conceptualized six key themes: (1) post-top surgery cancer screening uncertainty, (2) lack of provider knowledge hindering appropriate care, (3) the experience of breast health spaces as heavily feminized, (4) the balance of aesthetic goals with cancer risk reduction, (5) increased comfort with postsurgical screening because of reduced dysphoria and greater body confidence, and (6) the desire for cancer genetics integration with top surgery care navigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From these themes, we derived actionable guidance to address breast cancer health equity in this population. Enhancing patient education, increasing provider awareness, and developing inclusive clinical practice guidelines are crucial steps in effectively addressing breast cancer risk in individuals receiving surgery. It is vital to degender health spaces to promote inclusion and accessibility of breast cancer prevention. Integrating genetics professionals and cancer risk assessment into transgender health clinics and the top surgery process is paramount for delivering personalized care and facilitating informed surgical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500037"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people have increased cancer morbidity and mortality relative to cisgender individuals. Existing breast cancer prevention guidelines fail to adequately address gender-affirming care implications, especially in the context of gender-affirming mastectomies (top surgery). Evaluation of familial and germline genetic risk before top surgery is recommended by some transgender health guidelines. This evaluation can facilitate shared surgical decision making regarding breast tissue resection extent. In this study, we use in-depth interviews with TGD people planning or having recently undergone top surgery. We aimed to understand barriers and facilitators to pre- and post-top surgery breast cancer risk assessment and screening, and the perceived utility and acceptability of presurgical genetic evaluation.

Methods: We conducted qualitative community-engaged research through interviews with 16 TGD adults who had or were considering top surgery. Through a social constructivist lens, we used reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes.

Results: We conceptualized six key themes: (1) post-top surgery cancer screening uncertainty, (2) lack of provider knowledge hindering appropriate care, (3) the experience of breast health spaces as heavily feminized, (4) the balance of aesthetic goals with cancer risk reduction, (5) increased comfort with postsurgical screening because of reduced dysphoria and greater body confidence, and (6) the desire for cancer genetics integration with top surgery care navigation.

Conclusion: From these themes, we derived actionable guidance to address breast cancer health equity in this population. Enhancing patient education, increasing provider awareness, and developing inclusive clinical practice guidelines are crucial steps in effectively addressing breast cancer risk in individuals receiving surgery. It is vital to degender health spaces to promote inclusion and accessibility of breast cancer prevention. Integrating genetics professionals and cancer risk assessment into transgender health clinics and the top surgery process is paramount for delivering personalized care and facilitating informed surgical decision making.

性别确认手术中遗传性乳腺癌风险评估的跨性别和性别多样化患者观点。
目的:变性人和性别多样性(TGD)的人相对于顺性人有更高的癌症发病率和死亡率。现有的乳腺癌预防指南未能充分解决性别确认护理的问题,特别是在性别确认乳房切除术(顶级手术)的背景下。一些跨性别健康指南建议在绝顶手术前评估家族性和生殖系遗传风险。该评价有助于对乳腺组织切除程度的手术决策。在这项研究中,我们对计划或最近接受过顶级手术的TGD患者进行了深度访谈。我们的目的是了解术前和术后乳腺癌风险评估和筛查的障碍和促进因素,以及术前遗传评估的感知效用和可接受性。方法:我们通过访谈16名接受过或正在考虑接受顶级手术的TGD成人,进行了定性的社区参与研究。通过社会建构主义的视角,我们使用反身性主题分析来生成主题。结果:我们概念化了六个关键主题:(1)术后癌症筛查的不确定性,(2)缺乏提供者知识阻碍适当护理,(3)乳房健康空间严重女性化的经验,(4)美学目标与癌症风险降低的平衡,(5)术后筛查的舒适度增加,因为减少了烦躁不安和更大的身体自信,以及(6)癌症遗传学与顶级手术护理导航的融合。结论:从这些主题中,我们得出了可操作的指导,以解决这一人群的乳腺癌健康平等问题。加强患者教育,提高医生意识,制定包容性临床实践指南是有效解决接受手术患者乳腺癌风险的关键步骤。至关重要的是消除卫生空间的性别歧视,以促进乳腺癌预防的包容性和可及性。将遗传学专家和癌症风险评估整合到跨性别健康诊所和顶级手术过程中,对于提供个性化护理和促进知情的手术决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信