Management of Atrial Flutter (AFL) Using Intrinsic Antitachycardia Pacing (iATP) Protocol.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joshua R Silverstein, Manasvi Gupta, Troy Jackson, Chaojing Duan, Caitlin Phalunas, Ali Noory, Dallin Kelly, George Shaw, Mati Friehling, Emerson Liu, William Belden, Tharian S Cherian, Amit J Thosani
{"title":"Management of Atrial Flutter (AFL) Using Intrinsic Antitachycardia Pacing (iATP) Protocol.","authors":"Joshua R Silverstein, Manasvi Gupta, Troy Jackson, Chaojing Duan, Caitlin Phalunas, Ali Noory, Dallin Kelly, George Shaw, Mati Friehling, Emerson Liu, William Belden, Tharian S Cherian, Amit J Thosani","doi":"10.1111/jce.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditional management of atrial flutter (AFl) includes catheter ablation and pharmacological therapy. Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) has been explored as an alternative, with variable efficacy in terminating atrial arrhythmias. The intrinsic ATP (iATP) algorithm, previously validated for ventricular tachycardia, may offer enhanced efficacy in the atrium by leveraging programmed stimulation (PS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the efficacy of iATP in terminating AFl and compares it to traditional ramp pacing protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized crossover trial was conducted in patients undergoing AFl ablation. Three ATP protocols were tested: (1) ramp pacing at 91% of tachycardia cycle length (TCL), (2) ramp pacing at 81% TCL, and (3) iATP, which incorporated PS with decrementing extra-stimuli. The primary endpoint was termination of AFl or acceleration to atrial fibrillation (AF), which was considered beneficial for rate control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients completed the protocol. AFl termination rates were 17.6% (Protocol 1), 20.5% (Protocol 2), and 38% (iATP). The iATP protocol also induced AF in 8 cases, compared to 1 and 4 cases in Protocols 1 and 2, respectively. The increased efficacy of iATP is attributed to its ability to introduce premature wavefronts into the excitable gap, enhancing termination rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>iATP demonstrated superior efficacy in terminating AFl and accelerating it to AF compared to traditional ramp pacing. These findings support further exploration of iATP as a pacing-based intervention in atrial arrhythmia management. Future studies should assess its broader applicability in atypical AFl and AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traditional management of atrial flutter (AFl) includes catheter ablation and pharmacological therapy. Antitachycardia pacing (ATP) has been explored as an alternative, with variable efficacy in terminating atrial arrhythmias. The intrinsic ATP (iATP) algorithm, previously validated for ventricular tachycardia, may offer enhanced efficacy in the atrium by leveraging programmed stimulation (PS).

Objective: This study evaluates the efficacy of iATP in terminating AFl and compares it to traditional ramp pacing protocols.

Methods: A prospective, randomized crossover trial was conducted in patients undergoing AFl ablation. Three ATP protocols were tested: (1) ramp pacing at 91% of tachycardia cycle length (TCL), (2) ramp pacing at 81% TCL, and (3) iATP, which incorporated PS with decrementing extra-stimuli. The primary endpoint was termination of AFl or acceleration to atrial fibrillation (AF), which was considered beneficial for rate control.

Results: Seventeen patients completed the protocol. AFl termination rates were 17.6% (Protocol 1), 20.5% (Protocol 2), and 38% (iATP). The iATP protocol also induced AF in 8 cases, compared to 1 and 4 cases in Protocols 1 and 2, respectively. The increased efficacy of iATP is attributed to its ability to introduce premature wavefronts into the excitable gap, enhancing termination rates.

Conclusion: iATP demonstrated superior efficacy in terminating AFl and accelerating it to AF compared to traditional ramp pacing. These findings support further exploration of iATP as a pacing-based intervention in atrial arrhythmia management. Future studies should assess its broader applicability in atypical AFl and AF.

使用内在抗心动过速起搏(iATP)方案治疗心房扑动(AFL)。
背景:心房扑动(AFl)的传统治疗包括导管消融和药物治疗。抗心动过速起搏(ATP)已被探索作为一种替代方法,在终止心房心律失常方面具有不同的疗效。内禀ATP (iATP)算法,先前在室性心动过速中得到验证,可以通过利用程序化刺激(PS)提高心房的疗效。目的:本研究评估iATP终止AFl的效果,并将其与传统的斜坡起搏方案进行比较。方法:一项前瞻性、随机交叉试验在接受AFl消融的患者中进行。测试了三种ATP方案:(1)在心动过速周期长度(TCL) 91%时的斜坡起搏,(2)在81% TCL时的斜坡起搏,以及(3)将PS与减少外刺激相结合的iATP。主要终点是房颤终止或房颤加速(AF),这被认为有利于房颤率控制。结果:17例患者完成了治疗方案。AFl终止率分别为17.6%(方案1)、20.5%(方案2)和38% (iATP)。itp协议也诱发了8例AF,而协议1和协议2分别为1例和4例。iATP的有效性增加是由于它能够将过早的波前引入可激发间隙,从而提高终止率。结论:与传统的斜坡起搏相比,itp在终止AF和加速AF方面表现出更好的疗效。这些发现支持进一步探索itp作为一种以起搏为基础的心房心律失常治疗干预。未来的研究应评估其在非典型AFl和AF中的更广泛适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信