Opioid administration guided by Surgical Pleth Index in patients with a combination of general and regional anaesthesia during trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kim C Koschmieder, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Lea-Sophie Borst, Gillis Greiwe, Elena Kainz, Marlene Fischer, Rainer Nitzschke
{"title":"Opioid administration guided by Surgical Pleth Index in patients with a combination of general and regional anaesthesia during trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Kim C Koschmieder, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Lea-Sophie Borst, Gillis Greiwe, Elena Kainz, Marlene Fischer, Rainer Nitzschke","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01363-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomised controlled trial investigated the effect of Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) guided sufentanil administration on intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia having trauma and orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia undergoing trauma or orthopaedic surgery were randomised into two groups to receive either sufentanil guided by SPI monitoring or by routine care (Control). The primary endpoint was intraoperative sufentanil consumption. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain level, opioid consumption, incidence of nausea, duration of time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median intraoperative sufentanil administration adjusted to bodyweight and surgery duration did not differ between the groups: SPI guided group 2.29 (interquartile range, IQR 0.29 to 6.91), Control 1.65 (IQR 0.83 to 2.63) µg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>*1000 (P = 0.906). The relative risk for receiving intraoperative sufentanil was RR 0.909 (95% CI 0.723 to  1.143, P = 0.414). Median morphine equivalents administered in the 24 h after discharge from the PACU were 3.8 (IQR 0.0 to 22.5) in the SPI guided group and 19.1 (IQR 3.8 to 30.0) mg (P = 0.021) in the control group without adjustment for multiple testing. Other secondary endpoints showed no differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPI guided sufentanil administration did not reduce intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients having trauma and orthopaedic surgery with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT06040307 (registered September 8, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01363-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This randomised controlled trial investigated the effect of Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) guided sufentanil administration on intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia having trauma and orthopaedic surgery.

Methods: Eighty patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia undergoing trauma or orthopaedic surgery were randomised into two groups to receive either sufentanil guided by SPI monitoring or by routine care (Control). The primary endpoint was intraoperative sufentanil consumption. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain level, opioid consumption, incidence of nausea, duration of time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and quality of recovery.

Results: The median intraoperative sufentanil administration adjusted to bodyweight and surgery duration did not differ between the groups: SPI guided group 2.29 (interquartile range, IQR 0.29 to 6.91), Control 1.65 (IQR 0.83 to 2.63) µg·kg-1·min-1*1000 (P = 0.906). The relative risk for receiving intraoperative sufentanil was RR 0.909 (95% CI 0.723 to  1.143, P = 0.414). Median morphine equivalents administered in the 24 h after discharge from the PACU were 3.8 (IQR 0.0 to 22.5) in the SPI guided group and 19.1 (IQR 3.8 to 30.0) mg (P = 0.021) in the control group without adjustment for multiple testing. Other secondary endpoints showed no differences.

Conclusion: SPI guided sufentanil administration did not reduce intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients having trauma and orthopaedic surgery with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT06040307 (registered September 8, 2023).

创伤和骨科手术中全麻和局部麻醉联合使用的阿片类药物:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
目的:本随机对照试验调查外科手术体积指数(SPI)指导舒芬太尼给药对术中舒芬太尼用量的影响,与常规护理相比,在创伤和骨科手术中全麻和区域麻醉联合使用的患者。方法:80例创伤或骨科手术全麻和区域麻醉联合应用的患者随机分为两组,在SPI监测指导下接受舒芬太尼治疗和常规护理(对照组)。主要终点是术中舒芬太尼的消耗。次要终点是术后疼痛水平、阿片类药物消耗、恶心发生率、麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的持续时间和恢复质量。结果:术中舒芬太尼给药中位数与体重和手术时间的关系各组间无显著差异:SPI引导组2.29(四分位数范围,IQR 0.29 ~ 6.91),对照组1.65 (IQR 0.83 ~ 2.63)µg·kg-1·min-1*1000 (P = 0.906)。术中使用舒芬太尼的相对危险度RR为0.909 (95% CI 0.723 ~ 1.143, P = 0.414)。SPI引导组出院后24 h吗啡当量中位数为3.8 mg (IQR为0.0 ~ 22.5),对照组为19.1 mg (IQR为3.8 ~ 30.0)mg (P = 0.021)。其他次要终点无差异。结论:与常规护理相比,SPI引导舒芬太尼给药并没有减少创伤骨科手术患者术中舒芬太尼的消耗,同时采用全身麻醉和区域麻醉。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov识别码NCT06040307(注册于2023年9月8日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信