Opioid administration guided by Surgical Pleth Index in patients with a combination of general and regional anaesthesia during trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Kim C Koschmieder, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Lea-Sophie Borst, Gillis Greiwe, Elena Kainz, Marlene Fischer, Rainer Nitzschke
{"title":"Opioid administration guided by Surgical Pleth Index in patients with a combination of general and regional anaesthesia during trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Kim C Koschmieder, Hans O Pinnschmidt, Lea-Sophie Borst, Gillis Greiwe, Elena Kainz, Marlene Fischer, Rainer Nitzschke","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01363-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomised controlled trial investigated the effect of Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) guided sufentanil administration on intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia having trauma and orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia undergoing trauma or orthopaedic surgery were randomised into two groups to receive either sufentanil guided by SPI monitoring or by routine care (Control). The primary endpoint was intraoperative sufentanil consumption. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain level, opioid consumption, incidence of nausea, duration of time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and quality of recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median intraoperative sufentanil administration adjusted to bodyweight and surgery duration did not differ between the groups: SPI guided group 2.29 (interquartile range, IQR 0.29 to 6.91), Control 1.65 (IQR 0.83 to 2.63) µg·kg<sup>-1</sup>·min<sup>-1</sup>*1000 (P = 0.906). The relative risk for receiving intraoperative sufentanil was RR 0.909 (95% CI 0.723 to 1.143, P = 0.414). Median morphine equivalents administered in the 24 h after discharge from the PACU were 3.8 (IQR 0.0 to 22.5) in the SPI guided group and 19.1 (IQR 3.8 to 30.0) mg (P = 0.021) in the control group without adjustment for multiple testing. Other secondary endpoints showed no differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SPI guided sufentanil administration did not reduce intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients having trauma and orthopaedic surgery with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT06040307 (registered September 8, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01363-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This randomised controlled trial investigated the effect of Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) guided sufentanil administration on intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia having trauma and orthopaedic surgery.
Methods: Eighty patients with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia undergoing trauma or orthopaedic surgery were randomised into two groups to receive either sufentanil guided by SPI monitoring or by routine care (Control). The primary endpoint was intraoperative sufentanil consumption. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain level, opioid consumption, incidence of nausea, duration of time in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) and quality of recovery.
Results: The median intraoperative sufentanil administration adjusted to bodyweight and surgery duration did not differ between the groups: SPI guided group 2.29 (interquartile range, IQR 0.29 to 6.91), Control 1.65 (IQR 0.83 to 2.63) µg·kg-1·min-1*1000 (P = 0.906). The relative risk for receiving intraoperative sufentanil was RR 0.909 (95% CI 0.723 to 1.143, P = 0.414). Median morphine equivalents administered in the 24 h after discharge from the PACU were 3.8 (IQR 0.0 to 22.5) in the SPI guided group and 19.1 (IQR 3.8 to 30.0) mg (P = 0.021) in the control group without adjustment for multiple testing. Other secondary endpoints showed no differences.
Conclusion: SPI guided sufentanil administration did not reduce intraoperative sufentanil consumption compared to routine care in patients having trauma and orthopaedic surgery with a combination of general anaesthesia and regional anaesthesia.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT06040307 (registered September 8, 2023).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.