Lesion Depth Optimization in High-Power Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluating Single High-Power and Combined Very High-Power Applications.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hidehiro Iwakawa, Masateru Takigawa, Ryosuke Kato, Junji Yamaguchi, Masaki Honda, Ryo Tateishi, Miho Negishi, Iwanari Kawamura, Kentaro Goto, Takuro Nishimura, Kazuya Yamao, Susumu Tao, Sayaka Suzuki, Takehiro Iwanaga, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Tetsuo Sasano
{"title":"Lesion Depth Optimization in High-Power Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluating Single High-Power and Combined Very High-Power Applications.","authors":"Hidehiro Iwakawa, Masateru Takigawa, Ryosuke Kato, Junji Yamaguchi, Masaki Honda, Ryo Tateishi, Miho Negishi, Iwanari Kawamura, Kentaro Goto, Takuro Nishimura, Kazuya Yamao, Susumu Tao, Sayaka Suzuki, Takehiro Iwanaga, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Tetsuo Sasano","doi":"10.1111/jce.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation creates shallower lesions, which may be insufficient in thick myocardial regions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To clarify an effective ablation strategy following the initial vHPSD application and determine the best approach to create sufficient lesion depth in thick myocardial regions using ex vivo and in vivo models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lesion metrics were compared under various settings: 35 W versus 50 W with the same target ablation index (AI) (Step 1); double vHPSD ablations versus vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation (Step 2); double applications (DA) with vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation with a target AI of 450 versus single application (SA) with a target AI of 550 at 50 W (Step 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesion depth was comparable between groups with the same AI but different RF powers. Lesions were significantly deeper in the vHPSD ablation followed by a target AI of 450 compared to double vHPSD ablations (vHPSD + vHPSD, 3.4 [3.1-3.6] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 35 W, 4.4 [4.1-4.9] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 50 W, 4.5 [4.1-4.9] mm, p < 0.001). High-power SA with a target AI of 550 created significantly deeper lesions than vHPSD + AI 450 (DA vs. SA, 4.5 [3.5-5.3] mm vs. 5.0 [4.1-5.9] mm, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-guided RF applications following vHPSD effectively increased lesion depth more than repeated vHPSD. However, a single high-power application targeting a higher AI resulted in the deepest lesions. This strategy may be particularly beneficial in thick atrial myocardial regions to enhance lesion durability and improve procedural outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation creates shallower lesions, which may be insufficient in thick myocardial regions.

Aims: To clarify an effective ablation strategy following the initial vHPSD application and determine the best approach to create sufficient lesion depth in thick myocardial regions using ex vivo and in vivo models.

Methods: Lesion metrics were compared under various settings: 35 W versus 50 W with the same target ablation index (AI) (Step 1); double vHPSD ablations versus vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation (Step 2); double applications (DA) with vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation with a target AI of 450 versus single application (SA) with a target AI of 550 at 50 W (Step 3).

Results: Lesion depth was comparable between groups with the same AI but different RF powers. Lesions were significantly deeper in the vHPSD ablation followed by a target AI of 450 compared to double vHPSD ablations (vHPSD + vHPSD, 3.4 [3.1-3.6] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 35 W, 4.4 [4.1-4.9] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 50 W, 4.5 [4.1-4.9] mm, p < 0.001). High-power SA with a target AI of 550 created significantly deeper lesions than vHPSD + AI 450 (DA vs. SA, 4.5 [3.5-5.3] mm vs. 5.0 [4.1-5.9] mm, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: AI-guided RF applications following vHPSD effectively increased lesion depth more than repeated vHPSD. However, a single high-power application targeting a higher AI resulted in the deepest lesions. This strategy may be particularly beneficial in thick atrial myocardial regions to enhance lesion durability and improve procedural outcomes.

高功率射频消融的病灶深度优化:评估单一高功率和组合极高功率应用。
背景:一种非常高功率的短时间(vHPSD)射频(RF)消融产生较浅的病变,在厚的心肌区域可能不够。目的:阐明初始vHPSD应用后的有效消融策略,并通过离体和体内模型确定在心肌厚区创造足够损伤深度的最佳方法。方法:在不同设置下比较病变指标:35 W与50 W,目标消融指数(AI)相同(步骤1);双vHPSD消融与vHPSD后人工智能引导消融(步骤2);vHPSD的双重应用(DA),随后是人工智能引导的消融,目标AI为450,与单次应用(SA)相比,目标AI为550,50w(步骤3)。结果:相同人工智能不同射频功率组间病变深度具有可比性。与两次vHPSD消融(vHPSD + vHPSD, 3.4 [3.1-3.6] mm; vHPSD + AI 450, 35 W, 4.4 [4.1-4.9] mm; vHPSD + AI 450, 50 W, 4.5 [4.1-4.9] mm, p)相比,vHPSD消融后目标AI为450的病变明显更深。结论:vHPSD后AI引导射频应用比重复vHPSD有效地增加了病变深度。然而,针对较高AI的单次高功率应用会导致最深的病变。这种策略可能特别有利于厚心房心肌区域,以增强病变的持久性和改善手术结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信