{"title":"Lesion Depth Optimization in High-Power Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluating Single High-Power and Combined Very High-Power Applications.","authors":"Hidehiro Iwakawa, Masateru Takigawa, Ryosuke Kato, Junji Yamaguchi, Masaki Honda, Ryo Tateishi, Miho Negishi, Iwanari Kawamura, Kentaro Goto, Takuro Nishimura, Kazuya Yamao, Susumu Tao, Sayaka Suzuki, Takehiro Iwanaga, Shinsuke Miyazaki, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Tetsuo Sasano","doi":"10.1111/jce.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation creates shallower lesions, which may be insufficient in thick myocardial regions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To clarify an effective ablation strategy following the initial vHPSD application and determine the best approach to create sufficient lesion depth in thick myocardial regions using ex vivo and in vivo models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lesion metrics were compared under various settings: 35 W versus 50 W with the same target ablation index (AI) (Step 1); double vHPSD ablations versus vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation (Step 2); double applications (DA) with vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation with a target AI of 450 versus single application (SA) with a target AI of 550 at 50 W (Step 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lesion depth was comparable between groups with the same AI but different RF powers. Lesions were significantly deeper in the vHPSD ablation followed by a target AI of 450 compared to double vHPSD ablations (vHPSD + vHPSD, 3.4 [3.1-3.6] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 35 W, 4.4 [4.1-4.9] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 50 W, 4.5 [4.1-4.9] mm, p < 0.001). High-power SA with a target AI of 550 created significantly deeper lesions than vHPSD + AI 450 (DA vs. SA, 4.5 [3.5-5.3] mm vs. 5.0 [4.1-5.9] mm, p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-guided RF applications following vHPSD effectively increased lesion depth more than repeated vHPSD. However, a single high-power application targeting a higher AI resulted in the deepest lesions. This strategy may be particularly beneficial in thick atrial myocardial regions to enhance lesion durability and improve procedural outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) radiofrequency (RF) ablation creates shallower lesions, which may be insufficient in thick myocardial regions.
Aims: To clarify an effective ablation strategy following the initial vHPSD application and determine the best approach to create sufficient lesion depth in thick myocardial regions using ex vivo and in vivo models.
Methods: Lesion metrics were compared under various settings: 35 W versus 50 W with the same target ablation index (AI) (Step 1); double vHPSD ablations versus vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation (Step 2); double applications (DA) with vHPSD followed by AI-guided ablation with a target AI of 450 versus single application (SA) with a target AI of 550 at 50 W (Step 3).
Results: Lesion depth was comparable between groups with the same AI but different RF powers. Lesions were significantly deeper in the vHPSD ablation followed by a target AI of 450 compared to double vHPSD ablations (vHPSD + vHPSD, 3.4 [3.1-3.6] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 35 W, 4.4 [4.1-4.9] mm; vHPSD + AI 450 at 50 W, 4.5 [4.1-4.9] mm, p < 0.001). High-power SA with a target AI of 550 created significantly deeper lesions than vHPSD + AI 450 (DA vs. SA, 4.5 [3.5-5.3] mm vs. 5.0 [4.1-5.9] mm, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: AI-guided RF applications following vHPSD effectively increased lesion depth more than repeated vHPSD. However, a single high-power application targeting a higher AI resulted in the deepest lesions. This strategy may be particularly beneficial in thick atrial myocardial regions to enhance lesion durability and improve procedural outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.