Xinhe Mao, Wei He, Jose Tapia, Natalie Holowko, Jenny Bergqvist, Keith Humphreys, Kamila Czene
{"title":"Screen-Detected Breast Cancer Outcomes by Mammography Participation in Immediate Past Screening.","authors":"Xinhe Mao, Wei He, Jose Tapia, Natalie Holowko, Jenny Bergqvist, Keith Humphreys, Kamila Czene","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mammography screening is essential for the early detection of breast cancer; however, delayed detection among screen-detected breast cancers (SDBCs) is rarely studied.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether women diagnosed with SDBC who missed the screening round immediately before the diagnostic round experience clinically significant delays in detection and whether tumor characteristics vary.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective register-based cohort study included all women diagnosed with SDBC in Stockholm, Sweden, between January 1, 1995, and February 28, 2020, with a follow-up until December 31, 2022. Data were analyzed from November 5, 2023, to May 27, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Nonparticipation in the screening immediately prior to the diagnostic round.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 8602 women with SDBC (median age at diagnosis, 61 [IQR, 55-66] years), 1482 (17.2%) did not attend the immediate past screening. Nonparticipants in the past screening were more likely to have larger tumors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.55 [95% CI, 1.37-1.76] for a tumor size ≥20 mm), lymph node involvement (AOR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.12-1.45), and distant metastasis (AOR, 4.64 [95% CI, 2.10-10.29]) and less likely to have estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer (AOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.92]); however, there were no differences in progesterone receptor status (AOR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.83-1.11]) or ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) status (AOR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.81-1.24]). In addition, these women experienced poorer breast cancer-specific survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.08-1.65). There was no association after adjusting for tumor characteristics (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.89-1.38]). Additionally, no association was found between nonparticipation in the second-to-last screening and tumor characteristics among those with screen-detected breast cancers (AHR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.80-1.19] for stage II tumors or higher).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study suggest that some women with SDBC experience delayed detection and have clinically relevant worse outcomes. Future research is needed to investigate whether advancing the next mammography screening invitation date could enhance early detection and improve breast cancer outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2535330"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12495498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35330","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Mammography screening is essential for the early detection of breast cancer; however, delayed detection among screen-detected breast cancers (SDBCs) is rarely studied.
Objectives: To investigate whether women diagnosed with SDBC who missed the screening round immediately before the diagnostic round experience clinically significant delays in detection and whether tumor characteristics vary.
Design, setting, and participants: This prospective register-based cohort study included all women diagnosed with SDBC in Stockholm, Sweden, between January 1, 1995, and February 28, 2020, with a follow-up until December 31, 2022. Data were analyzed from November 5, 2023, to May 27, 2024.
Exposure: Nonparticipation in the screening immediately prior to the diagnostic round.
Main outcomes and measures: Tumor characteristics and breast cancer-specific survival.
Results: Among 8602 women with SDBC (median age at diagnosis, 61 [IQR, 55-66] years), 1482 (17.2%) did not attend the immediate past screening. Nonparticipants in the past screening were more likely to have larger tumors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.55 [95% CI, 1.37-1.76] for a tumor size ≥20 mm), lymph node involvement (AOR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.12-1.45), and distant metastasis (AOR, 4.64 [95% CI, 2.10-10.29]) and less likely to have estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer (AOR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.92]); however, there were no differences in progesterone receptor status (AOR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.83-1.11]) or ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu) status (AOR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.81-1.24]). In addition, these women experienced poorer breast cancer-specific survival, with an adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) of 1.33 (95% CI, 1.08-1.65). There was no association after adjusting for tumor characteristics (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.89-1.38]). Additionally, no association was found between nonparticipation in the second-to-last screening and tumor characteristics among those with screen-detected breast cancers (AHR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.80-1.19] for stage II tumors or higher).
Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that some women with SDBC experience delayed detection and have clinically relevant worse outcomes. Future research is needed to investigate whether advancing the next mammography screening invitation date could enhance early detection and improve breast cancer outcomes in this population.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health.
JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.