Digital Response Test in Epilepsy assesses interictal epileptiform discharge effects in real time.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1111/epi.18629
Andreas von Allmen, Diyuan Lu, Caroline Jagella, Yasmina Abukhadra, Rune Markhus, Jochen Triesch, Margaret Gopaul, Lawrence J Hirsch, Felix Rosenow, Hal Blumenfeld, Heinz Krestel
{"title":"Digital Response Test in Epilepsy assesses interictal epileptiform discharge effects in real time.","authors":"Andreas von Allmen, Diyuan Lu, Caroline Jagella, Yasmina Abukhadra, Rune Markhus, Jochen Triesch, Margaret Gopaul, Lawrence J Hirsch, Felix Rosenow, Hal Blumenfeld, Heinz Krestel","doi":"10.1111/epi.18629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in people with epilepsy (PWE) can impair cognitive functions and increase reaction time (RT) and the likelihood of missed reactions. These effects are not routinely assessed, because reliable methods for detecting IEDs of variable appearance in real time and suitable tests to measure IED effects do not yet exist. The objective was to assess different IED effects using new artificial intelligence and medical electronics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Digital Response Test in Epilepsy (DigRTEpi) consisted of a laptop and electronic circuits in a closed loop. Our model with Markov Transition Fields and a deep neural network (ResNet34) visualized the electroencephalogram (EEG) and classified the resulting images. IED detection triggered stimuli in a driving game or in a new cognitive assessment, the interictal Automated Responsiveness Test (iART). DigRTEpi was validated in a prospective case series with 20 people with focal and generalized epilepsies. During offline analysis, sensitivity, specificity, false-positive IED detection rate, latency of EEG classification, IED-induced RT prolongation, virtual crashes, and impaired responses to neuropsychological tasks were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model detected IEDs with 84% sensitivity and 96% specificity in our training dataset. In the prospective study with 20 PWE, median sensitivity was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] = .81-.95), and false-positive IED detection rate was 2.8 (95% CI 2.1-5.9). The ongoing EEG was classified window-by-window in a median 98.7 ms (95% CI = 98.0-99.4). Median RT prolongation and crash probability due to IEDs were 43.8 ms (95% CI = 20.3-64.7) and .9% (95% CI = 0-6.0) per person, respectively. Two patients (10%) had delays of >100 ms, found to be clinically relevant in our prior publication. IEDs caused four patients (20%) each to respond incorrectly or miss answers to neuropsychological tasks. The median false-positive IED detection rates were 2.8/min (95% CI = 2.1-5.9; driving game) and 2.1/min (95% CI = 1.5-3.2; iART).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>By effectively detecting IEDs of variable morphology in real time, DigRTEpi assessed the severity of IED-associated transitory impairment of virtual driving and cognition to improve personalized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18629","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in people with epilepsy (PWE) can impair cognitive functions and increase reaction time (RT) and the likelihood of missed reactions. These effects are not routinely assessed, because reliable methods for detecting IEDs of variable appearance in real time and suitable tests to measure IED effects do not yet exist. The objective was to assess different IED effects using new artificial intelligence and medical electronics.

Methods: The Digital Response Test in Epilepsy (DigRTEpi) consisted of a laptop and electronic circuits in a closed loop. Our model with Markov Transition Fields and a deep neural network (ResNet34) visualized the electroencephalogram (EEG) and classified the resulting images. IED detection triggered stimuli in a driving game or in a new cognitive assessment, the interictal Automated Responsiveness Test (iART). DigRTEpi was validated in a prospective case series with 20 people with focal and generalized epilepsies. During offline analysis, sensitivity, specificity, false-positive IED detection rate, latency of EEG classification, IED-induced RT prolongation, virtual crashes, and impaired responses to neuropsychological tasks were determined.

Results: The model detected IEDs with 84% sensitivity and 96% specificity in our training dataset. In the prospective study with 20 PWE, median sensitivity was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] = .81-.95), and false-positive IED detection rate was 2.8 (95% CI 2.1-5.9). The ongoing EEG was classified window-by-window in a median 98.7 ms (95% CI = 98.0-99.4). Median RT prolongation and crash probability due to IEDs were 43.8 ms (95% CI = 20.3-64.7) and .9% (95% CI = 0-6.0) per person, respectively. Two patients (10%) had delays of >100 ms, found to be clinically relevant in our prior publication. IEDs caused four patients (20%) each to respond incorrectly or miss answers to neuropsychological tasks. The median false-positive IED detection rates were 2.8/min (95% CI = 2.1-5.9; driving game) and 2.1/min (95% CI = 1.5-3.2; iART).

Significance: By effectively detecting IEDs of variable morphology in real time, DigRTEpi assessed the severity of IED-associated transitory impairment of virtual driving and cognition to improve personalized care.

数字反应测试在癫痫中实时评估间期癫痫样放电效应。
目的:癫痫患者(PWE)间期癫痫样放电(IEDs)可损害认知功能,增加反应时间(RT)和错过反应的可能性。这些影响没有得到常规评估,因为目前还不存在实时检测外观变化的简易爆炸装置的可靠方法和测量简易爆炸装置影响的适当测试。目的是评估使用新的人工智能和医疗电子设备的不同简易爆炸装置的影响。方法:癫痫数字反应测试(DigRTEpi)由笔记本电脑和闭环电路组成。我们的马尔可夫过渡场模型和深度神经网络(ResNet34)将脑电图(EEG)可视化并对结果图像进行分类。IED探测在驾驶游戏或新的认知评估——间隔自动反应测试(iART)中触发刺激。DigRTEpi在20例局灶性和全身性癫痫患者的前瞻性病例系列中得到验证。在离线分析中,确定敏感性、特异性、IED假阳性检出率、EEG分类潜伏期、IED诱导的RT延长、虚拟崩溃和对神经心理任务的受损反应。结果:该模型在训练数据集中检测ied的灵敏度为84%,特异性为96%。在20 PWE的前瞻性研究中,中位敏感性为90%(95%可信区间[CI] = 0.81 - 0.95),假阳性IED检出率为2.8 (95% CI 2.1-5.9)。正在进行的脑电图按窗口分类,中位数为98.7 ms (95% CI = 98.0-99.4)。简易爆炸装置(ied)导致的RT延长和碰撞概率中位数为43.8 ms (95% CI = 20.3-64.7)。分别为9% (95% CI = 0-6.0)。两名患者(10%)延迟bbb100 ms,在我们之前的出版物中发现与临床相关。简易爆炸装置导致四名患者(20%)对神经心理学任务的反应不正确或漏答。IED假阳性检出率中位数分别为2.8/min (95% CI = 2.1-5.9;驾驶游戏)和2.1/min (95% CI = 1.5-3.2; iART)。意义:DigRTEpi通过实时有效检测不同形态的ied,评估ied相关虚拟驾驶和认知的短暂性损伤严重程度,提高个性化护理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信