Medication Use in Type 1 Diabetes and the Association with Socioeconomic Disadvantage: Analysis of a National Linked Dataset.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ella Zomer, Jedidiah I Morton, Lei Chen, Stella Talic, Sybil A McAuley, Elizabeth A Davis, Timothy W Jones, Kate E Lomax, Dianna J Magliano, Jonathan E Shaw, Sophia Zoungas
{"title":"Medication Use in Type 1 Diabetes and the Association with Socioeconomic Disadvantage: Analysis of a National Linked Dataset.","authors":"Ella Zomer, Jedidiah I Morton, Lei Chen, Stella Talic, Sybil A McAuley, Elizabeth A Davis, Timothy W Jones, Kate E Lomax, Dianna J Magliano, Jonathan E Shaw, Sophia Zoungas","doi":"10.1177/15209156251383516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To explore trends in the receipt of commonly prescribed medications (beyond insulin) in people with type 1 diabetes in Australia, including polypharmacy, and to investigate socioeconomic disparities across these trends. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of 68,287 people with type 1 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme between 2013 and 2019, and linked to the Australian pharmaceutical claims database to capture medication use. The proportion of people with type 1 diabetes dispensed a medication class was assessed in each year, and by levels of Index of Relative Social Disadvantage. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study population comprised 37,055 (54.3%) males and 31,232 (45.7%) females captured between 2013 and 2019, with an overall median age of 38.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.1-53.3) years and median diabetes duration of 17.0 (IQR: 7.9-25.7) years. The median number of medications used in the study population was five (IQR: 3-8). Trends in receipt of commonly prescribed medications remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2019, except for the use of noninsulin (adjuvant) glucose-lowering agents, which increased. In 2019, compared with people in the least disadvantaged areas, those in the most disadvantaged areas were more likely to be receiving adjuvant glucose-lowering therapy (crude rates 21.5% vs. 11.6%), antihypertensive therapies (36.1% vs. 28.8%), lipid-lowering therapies (35.7% vs. 29.7%), antithrombotic medication (8.9% vs. 5.6%), proton pump inhibitors (25.2% vs. 17.1%), medications for asthma (13.2% vs. 8.4%), and medications for mental health (27.5% vs. 21.5%). Polypharmacy (defined as ≥5 medications) was more likely in those in the most disadvantaged areas compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (58.8% vs. 48.5%). Even after adjustment for patient factors, differences in medication use and polypharmacy across socioeconomic strata persisted. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Receipt of commonly prescribed medications in type 1 diabetes and polypharmacy were associated with increased socioeconomic disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251383516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore trends in the receipt of commonly prescribed medications (beyond insulin) in people with type 1 diabetes in Australia, including polypharmacy, and to investigate socioeconomic disparities across these trends. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 68,287 people with type 1 diabetes registered on the National Diabetes Services Scheme between 2013 and 2019, and linked to the Australian pharmaceutical claims database to capture medication use. The proportion of people with type 1 diabetes dispensed a medication class was assessed in each year, and by levels of Index of Relative Social Disadvantage. Results: The study population comprised 37,055 (54.3%) males and 31,232 (45.7%) females captured between 2013 and 2019, with an overall median age of 38.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 26.1-53.3) years and median diabetes duration of 17.0 (IQR: 7.9-25.7) years. The median number of medications used in the study population was five (IQR: 3-8). Trends in receipt of commonly prescribed medications remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2019, except for the use of noninsulin (adjuvant) glucose-lowering agents, which increased. In 2019, compared with people in the least disadvantaged areas, those in the most disadvantaged areas were more likely to be receiving adjuvant glucose-lowering therapy (crude rates 21.5% vs. 11.6%), antihypertensive therapies (36.1% vs. 28.8%), lipid-lowering therapies (35.7% vs. 29.7%), antithrombotic medication (8.9% vs. 5.6%), proton pump inhibitors (25.2% vs. 17.1%), medications for asthma (13.2% vs. 8.4%), and medications for mental health (27.5% vs. 21.5%). Polypharmacy (defined as ≥5 medications) was more likely in those in the most disadvantaged areas compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (58.8% vs. 48.5%). Even after adjustment for patient factors, differences in medication use and polypharmacy across socioeconomic strata persisted. Conclusions: Receipt of commonly prescribed medications in type 1 diabetes and polypharmacy were associated with increased socioeconomic disadvantage.

1型糖尿病患者用药与社会经济劣势的关系:国家关联数据集分析
目的:探讨澳大利亚1型糖尿病患者接受常用处方药(除胰岛素外)的趋势,包括多种用药,并调查这些趋势中的社会经济差异。方法:回顾性分析2013年至2019年期间在国家糖尿病服务计划中登记的68,287名1型糖尿病患者,并与澳大利亚药品索赔数据库相关联,以获取药物使用情况。每年对1型糖尿病患者分配药物的比例进行评估,并根据相对社会劣势指数的水平进行评估。结果:在2013年至2019年期间,研究人群包括37,055名(54.3%)男性和31,232名(45.7%)女性,总体中位年龄为38.8(四分位数间距[IQR]: 26.1-53.3)岁,中位糖尿病病程为17.0 (IQR: 7.9-25.7)年。研究人群中使用的药物中位数为5种(IQR: 3-8)。2013年至2019年期间,常用处方药的使用趋势保持相对稳定,但非胰岛素(辅助)降糖药的使用有所增加。2019年,与最贫困地区的人群相比,最贫困地区的人群更有可能接受辅助降糖治疗(粗率21.5%比11.6%)、降压治疗(36.1%比28.8%)、降脂治疗(35.7%比29.7%)、抗血栓药物(8.9%比5.6%)、质子泵抑制剂(25.2%比17.1%)、哮喘药物(13.2%比8.4%)和精神健康药物(27.5%比21.5%)。多药(定义为≥5种药物)在最贫困地区的发生率高于最贫困地区(58.8%比48.5%)。即使在对患者因素进行调整后,不同社会经济阶层在药物使用和多种用药方面的差异仍然存在。结论:1型糖尿病患者接受常用药物和多种药物治疗与社会经济劣势增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信