Consensus-guided evaluation of self-supervised learning in echocardiographic segmentation

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Preshen Naidoo , Patricia Fernandes , Nasim Dadashi Serej , Charlotte H. Manisty , Matthew J. Shun-Shin , Darrel P. Francis , Massoud Zolgharni
{"title":"Consensus-guided evaluation of self-supervised learning in echocardiographic segmentation","authors":"Preshen Naidoo ,&nbsp;Patricia Fernandes ,&nbsp;Nasim Dadashi Serej ,&nbsp;Charlotte H. Manisty ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Shun-Shin ,&nbsp;Darrel P. Francis ,&nbsp;Massoud Zolgharni","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>Left ventricle segmentation is a fundamental task in echocardiography, essential for assessing cardiac function. However, deep learning models for segmentation rely on large labelled datasets, which are expensive and time-consuming to annotate. Self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising approach to leverage unlabelled data, but its effectiveness for left ventricle segmentation remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>This study investigates self-supervised learning for echocardiographic segmentation, comparing various pretext tasks. The impact of dataset size and distribution on pre-training is examined, revealing that excessive unlabelled data can degrade performance due to redundancy and low variability. A novel multi-expert labelled dataset is introduced to enhance segmentation evaluation, using consensus-based annotations to reduce annotation noise and improve reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Among the self-supervised learning methods evaluated, contrastive learning consistently outperforms other approaches, particularly in low-label settings. The study demonstrates that AI models pre-trained using self-supervised learning and fine-tuned with only 15% of labelled data achieve stronger alignment with multi-expert consensus than any individual expert.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The findings suggest that AI models can generalise well across expert annotations, providing more reliable and reproducible assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 111148"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001048252501501X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

Left ventricle segmentation is a fundamental task in echocardiography, essential for assessing cardiac function. However, deep learning models for segmentation rely on large labelled datasets, which are expensive and time-consuming to annotate. Self-supervised learning has emerged as a promising approach to leverage unlabelled data, but its effectiveness for left ventricle segmentation remains underexplored.

Methods:

This study investigates self-supervised learning for echocardiographic segmentation, comparing various pretext tasks. The impact of dataset size and distribution on pre-training is examined, revealing that excessive unlabelled data can degrade performance due to redundancy and low variability. A novel multi-expert labelled dataset is introduced to enhance segmentation evaluation, using consensus-based annotations to reduce annotation noise and improve reliability.

Results:

Among the self-supervised learning methods evaluated, contrastive learning consistently outperforms other approaches, particularly in low-label settings. The study demonstrates that AI models pre-trained using self-supervised learning and fine-tuned with only 15% of labelled data achieve stronger alignment with multi-expert consensus than any individual expert.

Conclusion:

The findings suggest that AI models can generalise well across expert annotations, providing more reliable and reproducible assessments.
超声心动图分割中自我监督学习的共识导向评价。
背景:左心室分割是超声心动图的一项基本任务,对评估心功能至关重要。然而,用于分割的深度学习模型依赖于大型标记数据集,这是昂贵且耗时的注释。自监督学习已成为利用未标记数据的一种有前途的方法,但其对左心室分割的有效性仍未得到充分探讨。方法对超声心动图分割的自我监督学习进行研究,并对各种借口任务进行比较。研究了数据集大小和分布对预训练的影响,揭示了过多的未标记数据会由于冗余和低可变性而降低性能。引入了一种新的多专家标记数据集来增强分割评估,使用基于共识的标注来降低标注噪声,提高可靠性。结果:在评估的自我监督学习方法中,对比学习始终优于其他方法,特别是在低标签设置中。该研究表明,使用自我监督学习和仅使用15%的标记数据进行微调的人工智能模型与多专家共识的一致性比任何单个专家都强。结论:研究结果表明,人工智能模型可以很好地概括专家注释,提供更可靠和可重复的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信