Comorbidity burden in elderly high-grade glioma patients: impact on radiotherapy outcomes.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sophia M Leiss, Benedikt Wiestler, Helen X Hou, Daniel Schmottermeyer, Valeriya Sackerer, Christian Diehl, Jan Peeken, Kai Borm, Chiara Negwer, Arthur Wagner, Igor Yakushev, Claire Delbridge, Meike Mitsdörffer, Friederike Schmidt-Graf, Bernhard Meyer, Stephanie Combs, Denise Bernhardt
{"title":"Comorbidity burden in elderly high-grade glioma patients: impact on radiotherapy outcomes.","authors":"Sophia M Leiss, Benedikt Wiestler, Helen X Hou, Daniel Schmottermeyer, Valeriya Sackerer, Christian Diehl, Jan Peeken, Kai Borm, Chiara Negwer, Arthur Wagner, Igor Yakushev, Claire Delbridge, Meike Mitsdörffer, Friederike Schmidt-Graf, Bernhard Meyer, Stephanie Combs, Denise Bernhardt","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14957-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elderly high-grade glioma (HGG) or glioblastoma (GBM) patients face challenging treatment conditions due to comorbidities and age-related factors. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) accounts for age and comorbidities and serves as a tool for predicting survival rates in various clinical scenarios. This study examined its prognostic value in elderly HGG patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 163 elderly HGG patients (≥ 60 years) treated with radiotherapy (RT) or chemo-RT (CRT) at TUM University Hospital (2001-2021). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated median overall survival (OS) by ACCI group (≤ 5 vs. ≥6). Multivariate Cox regressions assessed OS and progression-free-survival (PFS) based on fractionation and treatment strategies. Further Cox models evaluated ACCI scores, age, comorbidities, and mortality. A random survival forest (RSF) identified key survival predictors, using permutation importance with bootstrapped confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 163 HGG patients, those with greater comorbidities (ACCI ≥ 6) had a shorter median OS (14.8 months) than did those with ACCI ≤ 5 (22.6 months) (log-rank p = 0.463). In the ACCI ≤ 5 subgroup, hypofractionated RT (hRT) alone was significantly associated with worse OS than Stupp was (HR = 85.7, 95% CI: 7.1-914.3, p = 0.0004), whereas no significant differences were detected in the ACCI ≥ 6 subgroup. Hypofractionated RT was associated with improved PFS in patients with an ACCI ≥ 6 (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.92, p = 0.027), and MGMT methylation better predicted OS (HR = 0.31, p = 0.0039) and PFS (HR = 0.32, p = 0.0059). Diabetes without complications independently predicted worse OS (HR = 2.91 (95% CI: 1.63-5.18, p < 0.001)) and PFS (HR = 2.59 (95% CI: 1.43-4.70, p = 0.002), with a significant interaction between diabetes and the ACCI (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07-0.91, p = 0.03). RSF models identified age as the key predictor of OS and MGMT methylation as the main predictor of PFS, while ACCI ≥ 6 contributed only modestly (mean drop for OS: 0.025; and PFS: 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ACCI showed limited and inconsistent prognostic value in elderly glioblastoma patients, while diabetes emerged as the only consistent comorbidity predictor of OS and PFS. These findings suggest that comorbidity burden may influence outcomes but underscore the need for larger studies to clarify the role of the ACCI in treatment stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14957-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elderly high-grade glioma (HGG) or glioblastoma (GBM) patients face challenging treatment conditions due to comorbidities and age-related factors. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) accounts for age and comorbidities and serves as a tool for predicting survival rates in various clinical scenarios. This study examined its prognostic value in elderly HGG patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 163 elderly HGG patients (≥ 60 years) treated with radiotherapy (RT) or chemo-RT (CRT) at TUM University Hospital (2001-2021). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated median overall survival (OS) by ACCI group (≤ 5 vs. ≥6). Multivariate Cox regressions assessed OS and progression-free-survival (PFS) based on fractionation and treatment strategies. Further Cox models evaluated ACCI scores, age, comorbidities, and mortality. A random survival forest (RSF) identified key survival predictors, using permutation importance with bootstrapped confidence intervals.

Results: Among the 163 HGG patients, those with greater comorbidities (ACCI ≥ 6) had a shorter median OS (14.8 months) than did those with ACCI ≤ 5 (22.6 months) (log-rank p = 0.463). In the ACCI ≤ 5 subgroup, hypofractionated RT (hRT) alone was significantly associated with worse OS than Stupp was (HR = 85.7, 95% CI: 7.1-914.3, p = 0.0004), whereas no significant differences were detected in the ACCI ≥ 6 subgroup. Hypofractionated RT was associated with improved PFS in patients with an ACCI ≥ 6 (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.92, p = 0.027), and MGMT methylation better predicted OS (HR = 0.31, p = 0.0039) and PFS (HR = 0.32, p = 0.0059). Diabetes without complications independently predicted worse OS (HR = 2.91 (95% CI: 1.63-5.18, p < 0.001)) and PFS (HR = 2.59 (95% CI: 1.43-4.70, p = 0.002), with a significant interaction between diabetes and the ACCI (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.07-0.91, p = 0.03). RSF models identified age as the key predictor of OS and MGMT methylation as the main predictor of PFS, while ACCI ≥ 6 contributed only modestly (mean drop for OS: 0.025; and PFS: 0.019).

Conclusions: The ACCI showed limited and inconsistent prognostic value in elderly glioblastoma patients, while diabetes emerged as the only consistent comorbidity predictor of OS and PFS. These findings suggest that comorbidity burden may influence outcomes but underscore the need for larger studies to clarify the role of the ACCI in treatment stratification.

老年高级别胶质瘤患者的合并症负担:对放疗结果的影响。
背景:由于合并症和年龄相关因素,老年高级别胶质瘤(HGG)或胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者面临着具有挑战性的治疗条件。年龄调整的Charlson合并症指数(ACCI)考虑了年龄和合并症,并作为预测各种临床情况下生存率的工具。本研究探讨了其在放疗(RT)和同步放化疗(CRT)的老年HGG患者中的预后价值。方法:回顾性分析2001-2021年在TUM大学医院接受放疗(RT)或化疗(CRT)治疗的163例老年HGG患者(≥60岁)。Kaplan-Meier分析估计ACCI组的中位总生存期(OS)(≤5 vs≥6)。多变量Cox回归评估基于分治和治疗策略的OS和无进展生存期(PFS)。进一步的Cox模型评估了ACCI评分、年龄、合并症和死亡率。随机生存森林(RSF)确定了关键的生存预测因子,使用排列重要性和自适应置信区间。结果:163例HGG患者中,合并症较大(ACCI≥6)患者的中位生存期(14.8个月)短于ACCI≤5(22.6个月)患者(log-rank p = 0.463)。在ACCI≤5亚组中,单独低分割RT (hRT)与较差的OS显著相关(HR = 85.7, 95% CI: 7.1-914.3, p = 0.0004),而在ACCI≥6亚组中无显著差异。在ACCI≥6的患者中,低分割RT与PFS改善相关(HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.24-0.92, p = 0.027), MGMT甲基化更好地预测OS (HR = 0.31, p = 0.0039)和PFS (HR = 0.32, p = 0.0059)。无并发症的糖尿病独立预测更差的OS (HR = 2.91) (95% CI: 1.63-5.18, p)结论:ACCI对老年胶质母细胞瘤患者的预后价值有限且不一致,而糖尿病是唯一一致的OS和PFS合并症预测因子。这些发现表明,合并症负担可能会影响结果,但强调需要更大规模的研究来阐明ACCI在治疗分层中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信