Temporal complementarity drives nitrogen uptake in strip intercropping with or without legumes

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Bei Dong, Zishen Wang, Tjeerd Jan Stomph, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E. L. van der Putten, Wopke van der Werf
{"title":"Temporal complementarity drives nitrogen uptake in strip intercropping with or without legumes","authors":"Bei Dong,&nbsp;Zishen Wang,&nbsp;Tjeerd Jan Stomph,&nbsp;Jochem B. Evers,&nbsp;Peter E. L. van der Putten,&nbsp;Wopke van der Werf","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01052-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cereal/legume intercropping enables complementary nitrogen (N) uptake, whereas relay intercropping allows temporal complementarity. However, how these mechanisms contribute to N uptake under moderate, species-tailored N fertilization remains unclear, and clarifying this could inform intercropping practices aligned with Good Agricultural Practices in Europe. We therefore determined N uptake of maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.), faba bean (<i>Vicia faba</i> L.), and pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) in six bi-specific strip intercrops and corresponding monocrops. We compared relay intercrops involving maize (late sown) with simultaneous intercrops without maize, across cereal/legume, cereal/cereal, and legume/legume combinations. All species received locally recommended fertilizer amounts for conventional agriculture in the Netherlands. In relay strip intercrops, the early-sown wheat, faba bean, and pea had higher N uptake than the respective monocrops, especially in the border rows of strips. Maize N uptake increased when intercropped with wheat or pea in a year with substantial temporal complementarity. Intercropping with faba bean did not result in increased N uptake for either cereals or pea. Relay intercrops showed land equivalent ratios for N uptake and fertilizer N equivalent ratios mostly above one, while for simultaneous intercrops these were mostly close to one. Therefore, relay intercrops used land more efficiently for N uptake and saved fertilizer N for yield compared to monocrops, whereas simultaneous intercrops did not. We investigated, for the first time, the relative importance of temporal complementarity and cereal-legume N acquisition complementarity for N uptake in strip intercropping under conventional European agriculture, showing that complementary N uptake was strongly associated with temporal complementarity. While inclusion of legumes in intercropping was not required to achieve complementary N capture, it allowed for reduced N input. Relay strip intercropping with species-tailored N input is a pathway toward more sustainable N use in agriculture that can complement cereal-legume complementarity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-025-01052-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01052-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cereal/legume intercropping enables complementary nitrogen (N) uptake, whereas relay intercropping allows temporal complementarity. However, how these mechanisms contribute to N uptake under moderate, species-tailored N fertilization remains unclear, and clarifying this could inform intercropping practices aligned with Good Agricultural Practices in Europe. We therefore determined N uptake of maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) in six bi-specific strip intercrops and corresponding monocrops. We compared relay intercrops involving maize (late sown) with simultaneous intercrops without maize, across cereal/legume, cereal/cereal, and legume/legume combinations. All species received locally recommended fertilizer amounts for conventional agriculture in the Netherlands. In relay strip intercrops, the early-sown wheat, faba bean, and pea had higher N uptake than the respective monocrops, especially in the border rows of strips. Maize N uptake increased when intercropped with wheat or pea in a year with substantial temporal complementarity. Intercropping with faba bean did not result in increased N uptake for either cereals or pea. Relay intercrops showed land equivalent ratios for N uptake and fertilizer N equivalent ratios mostly above one, while for simultaneous intercrops these were mostly close to one. Therefore, relay intercrops used land more efficiently for N uptake and saved fertilizer N for yield compared to monocrops, whereas simultaneous intercrops did not. We investigated, for the first time, the relative importance of temporal complementarity and cereal-legume N acquisition complementarity for N uptake in strip intercropping under conventional European agriculture, showing that complementary N uptake was strongly associated with temporal complementarity. While inclusion of legumes in intercropping was not required to achieve complementary N capture, it allowed for reduced N input. Relay strip intercropping with species-tailored N input is a pathway toward more sustainable N use in agriculture that can complement cereal-legume complementarity.

时间互补性驱动带或不带豆科作物间作氮素吸收
谷物/豆科作物间作可以实现氮素的互补吸收,而中继间作则可以实现时间上的互补。然而,这些机制如何在适度的、适合品种的氮肥施肥下促进氮吸收尚不清楚,澄清这一点可以为与欧洲良好农业规范相一致的间作实践提供信息。因此,我们测定了玉米(Zea mays L.)、小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)、蚕豆(Vicia faba L.)和豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)在6种双特异性带状间作和相应的单作中的氮吸收。我们比较了包括玉米(晚播)的间作与不含玉米的间作、谷物/豆类、谷物/谷物和豆类/豆类组合的间作。在荷兰,所有品种都获得了当地推荐的常规农业肥料量。在接力带状间作中,早播小麦、蚕豆和豌豆的氮素吸收量均高于单作,特别是在条带边缘行。间作小麦或豌豆一年内玉米氮素吸收量增加,具有较强的时间互补性。蚕豆间作对谷物和豌豆的氮素吸收都没有增加。转作间作土壤氮素吸收等效比和肥料氮素等效比多在1以上,同期间作土壤氮素吸收等效比多接近1。因此,与单作相比,间作能更有效地利用土地吸收氮,节约氮肥以提高产量,而同期间作则不然。我们首次研究了欧洲传统农业条件下,谷物-豆科植物氮素获取补补性和时间补补性对带状间作氮素吸收的相对重要性,表明补补性氮素吸收与时间补补性密切相关。虽然间作中不需要包括豆类来实现补充氮捕获,但它允许减少氮输入。间作配合品种氮素输入是实现农业更可持续氮素利用的途径,可以补充谷物-豆类的互补性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信