Bei Dong, Zishen Wang, Tjeerd Jan Stomph, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E. L. van der Putten, Wopke van der Werf
{"title":"Temporal complementarity drives nitrogen uptake in strip intercropping with or without legumes","authors":"Bei Dong, Zishen Wang, Tjeerd Jan Stomph, Jochem B. Evers, Peter E. L. van der Putten, Wopke van der Werf","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01052-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cereal/legume intercropping enables complementary nitrogen (N) uptake, whereas relay intercropping allows temporal complementarity. However, how these mechanisms contribute to N uptake under moderate, species-tailored N fertilization remains unclear, and clarifying this could inform intercropping practices aligned with Good Agricultural Practices in Europe. We therefore determined N uptake of maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.), wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.), faba bean (<i>Vicia faba</i> L.), and pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) in six bi-specific strip intercrops and corresponding monocrops. We compared relay intercrops involving maize (late sown) with simultaneous intercrops without maize, across cereal/legume, cereal/cereal, and legume/legume combinations. All species received locally recommended fertilizer amounts for conventional agriculture in the Netherlands. In relay strip intercrops, the early-sown wheat, faba bean, and pea had higher N uptake than the respective monocrops, especially in the border rows of strips. Maize N uptake increased when intercropped with wheat or pea in a year with substantial temporal complementarity. Intercropping with faba bean did not result in increased N uptake for either cereals or pea. Relay intercrops showed land equivalent ratios for N uptake and fertilizer N equivalent ratios mostly above one, while for simultaneous intercrops these were mostly close to one. Therefore, relay intercrops used land more efficiently for N uptake and saved fertilizer N for yield compared to monocrops, whereas simultaneous intercrops did not. We investigated, for the first time, the relative importance of temporal complementarity and cereal-legume N acquisition complementarity for N uptake in strip intercropping under conventional European agriculture, showing that complementary N uptake was strongly associated with temporal complementarity. While inclusion of legumes in intercropping was not required to achieve complementary N capture, it allowed for reduced N input. Relay strip intercropping with species-tailored N input is a pathway toward more sustainable N use in agriculture that can complement cereal-legume complementarity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-025-01052-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01052-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cereal/legume intercropping enables complementary nitrogen (N) uptake, whereas relay intercropping allows temporal complementarity. However, how these mechanisms contribute to N uptake under moderate, species-tailored N fertilization remains unclear, and clarifying this could inform intercropping practices aligned with Good Agricultural Practices in Europe. We therefore determined N uptake of maize (Zea mays L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) in six bi-specific strip intercrops and corresponding monocrops. We compared relay intercrops involving maize (late sown) with simultaneous intercrops without maize, across cereal/legume, cereal/cereal, and legume/legume combinations. All species received locally recommended fertilizer amounts for conventional agriculture in the Netherlands. In relay strip intercrops, the early-sown wheat, faba bean, and pea had higher N uptake than the respective monocrops, especially in the border rows of strips. Maize N uptake increased when intercropped with wheat or pea in a year with substantial temporal complementarity. Intercropping with faba bean did not result in increased N uptake for either cereals or pea. Relay intercrops showed land equivalent ratios for N uptake and fertilizer N equivalent ratios mostly above one, while for simultaneous intercrops these were mostly close to one. Therefore, relay intercrops used land more efficiently for N uptake and saved fertilizer N for yield compared to monocrops, whereas simultaneous intercrops did not. We investigated, for the first time, the relative importance of temporal complementarity and cereal-legume N acquisition complementarity for N uptake in strip intercropping under conventional European agriculture, showing that complementary N uptake was strongly associated with temporal complementarity. While inclusion of legumes in intercropping was not required to achieve complementary N capture, it allowed for reduced N input. Relay strip intercropping with species-tailored N input is a pathway toward more sustainable N use in agriculture that can complement cereal-legume complementarity.
期刊介绍:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences.
ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels.
Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.