Assessment of urological complications in male patients with diabetes: Insights from a survey of healthcare providers.

IF 2.3
Mesut Altan, Emre Albayrak, Müjdat Ayva, Uğur Ünlütürk, Tomris Erbas
{"title":"Assessment of urological complications in male patients with diabetes: Insights from a survey of healthcare providers.","authors":"Mesut Altan, Emre Albayrak, Müjdat Ayva, Uğur Ünlütürk, Tomris Erbas","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' practices, attitudes, and challenges in assessing and managing urological complications, including lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) and erectile dysfunction (ED), in male patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-question online survey, distributed between April 2023 and January 2024, gathered responses from 370 physicians in Turkey. Participants represented various specialties, including endocrinology, internal medicine, family medicine, and general practice. The survey evaluated how frequently physicians inquired about symptoms, their use of validated assessment tools, and their management strategies for ED and LUTSs in male patients with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 40.3 % frequently asked about LUTSs, whereas 42.4 % reported rarely or never addressing these symptoms. More than 20 years of experience was significantly associated with higher inquiry rates (p = 0.001). Only 0.8 % of participants used validated symptom assessment tools. Concerning ED, 89.5 % of physicians noted that male patients with diabetes seldom reported related complaints, and only 20.3 % routinely asked about ED. Endocrinologists were significantly more likely to inquire about ED, with 36.2 % reporting such inquiries compared to 10.5 % among other specialties (p < 0.001). Most participants (53.5 %) preferred referring patients with ED to urology specialists for further management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urological complications in male patients with diabetes are under-assessed, with significant gaps in the use of validated tools and structured approaches. The study underscores the importance of raising awareness and implementing multidisciplinary strategies, such as regular symptom screening and timely interventions, to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate healthcare professionals' practices, attitudes, and challenges in assessing and managing urological complications, including lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) and erectile dysfunction (ED), in male patients with diabetes.

Methods: A 12-question online survey, distributed between April 2023 and January 2024, gathered responses from 370 physicians in Turkey. Participants represented various specialties, including endocrinology, internal medicine, family medicine, and general practice. The survey evaluated how frequently physicians inquired about symptoms, their use of validated assessment tools, and their management strategies for ED and LUTSs in male patients with diabetes.

Results: Of the participants, 40.3 % frequently asked about LUTSs, whereas 42.4 % reported rarely or never addressing these symptoms. More than 20 years of experience was significantly associated with higher inquiry rates (p = 0.001). Only 0.8 % of participants used validated symptom assessment tools. Concerning ED, 89.5 % of physicians noted that male patients with diabetes seldom reported related complaints, and only 20.3 % routinely asked about ED. Endocrinologists were significantly more likely to inquire about ED, with 36.2 % reporting such inquiries compared to 10.5 % among other specialties (p < 0.001). Most participants (53.5 %) preferred referring patients with ED to urology specialists for further management.

Conclusion: Urological complications in male patients with diabetes are under-assessed, with significant gaps in the use of validated tools and structured approaches. The study underscores the importance of raising awareness and implementing multidisciplinary strategies, such as regular symptom screening and timely interventions, to enhance patient outcomes.

男性糖尿病患者泌尿系统并发症的评估:来自医疗保健提供者调查的见解。
目的:本研究旨在调查医疗保健专业人员在评估和管理泌尿系统并发症(包括下尿路症状(LUTSs)和勃起功能障碍(ED))方面的做法、态度和挑战。方法:在2023年4月至2024年1月期间进行了一项包含12个问题的在线调查,收集了土耳其370名医生的回复。参与者代表了不同的专业,包括内分泌学、内科、家庭医学和全科医学。该调查评估了医生询问症状的频率,他们对有效评估工具的使用,以及他们对男性糖尿病患者ED和LUTSs的管理策略。结果:在参与者中,40.3% %经常询问LUTSs,而42.4 %报告很少或从未处理这些症状。超过20年的经验与较高的问询率显著相关(p = 0.001)。只有0.8 %的参与者使用有效的症状评估工具。关于ED, 89.5% %的医生注意到男性糖尿病患者很少报告相关的抱怨,只有20.3% %的医生经常询问ED。内分泌科医生更有可能询问ED, 36.2% %的医生报告了这一问题,而其他专科的这一比例为10.5% % (p )结论:男性糖尿病患者的泌尿系统并发症被低估,在使用有效的工具和结构化方法方面存在显著差距。该研究强调了提高认识和实施多学科战略的重要性,如定期症状筛查和及时干预,以提高患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信