Changes in inpatient and outpatient stroke admissions during COVID-19: a difference-in-differences analysis based on claims data from 242 acute care hospitals in Japan.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001958
Kazuhiro Abe, Shota Shibata, Atsushi Miyawaki, Ichiro Kawachi
{"title":"Changes in inpatient and outpatient stroke admissions during COVID-19: a difference-in-differences analysis based on claims data from 242 acute care hospitals in Japan.","authors":"Kazuhiro Abe, Shota Shibata, Atsushi Miyawaki, Ichiro Kawachi","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While COVID-19 has been associated with an elevated stroke risk due to its prothrombotic and inflammatory effects, previous studies have reported a decreased number of stroke hospitalisations during COVID-19. Patients with a stroke who could not be admitted might have been followed up in outpatient settings of these hospitals. Our study aimed to investigate the change in the number of patients who had a stroke admitted to inpatient and outpatient settings during COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A difference-in-differences design using claims data in 242 acute-care hospitals was adopted to examine stroke admissions in Japan, contrasting the pre-pandemic period (2015-2019) to the pandemic period (2020). The Japanese government's declaration of emergency in April 2020 was considered an exogenous shock. The outcomes were the numbers of ischaemic stroke (both embolic and non-embolic), intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage admissions, with in-hospital mortality rates, modified Rankin Scale and procedure uses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 27 631 stroke cases (44.3% women, median age 75 years (IQR 66-83)), no statistically significant changes were observed in the overall count of stroke admissions during the pandemic. A decrease in ischaemic stroke hospitalisations was detected (incidence-rate ratios (95% CI), 0.83 (0.73 to 0.95)), which was somewhat offset by an increasing trend for patients treated in the outpatient setting (1.06 (0.91 to 1.22)). No significant differences were found in in-hospital mortality rate, proportion of severe modified Rankin Scale at discharge and thrombolysis treatment rate. Rates of mechanical thrombectomy in ischaemic stroke were reduced (0.60 (0.36 to 0.99)), and length of stay was reduced for all types of stroke except intracerebral haemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When considering both inpatient and outpatient admissions for stroke, we found no statistically significant change in the number of stroke admissions in 2020 in Japan. In addition, our findings suggest that acute stroke inpatient care, at least during 2020, was appropriately managed despite limited resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 2","pages":"e001958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While COVID-19 has been associated with an elevated stroke risk due to its prothrombotic and inflammatory effects, previous studies have reported a decreased number of stroke hospitalisations during COVID-19. Patients with a stroke who could not be admitted might have been followed up in outpatient settings of these hospitals. Our study aimed to investigate the change in the number of patients who had a stroke admitted to inpatient and outpatient settings during COVID-19.

Methods: A difference-in-differences design using claims data in 242 acute-care hospitals was adopted to examine stroke admissions in Japan, contrasting the pre-pandemic period (2015-2019) to the pandemic period (2020). The Japanese government's declaration of emergency in April 2020 was considered an exogenous shock. The outcomes were the numbers of ischaemic stroke (both embolic and non-embolic), intracerebral haemorrhage and subarachnoid haemorrhage admissions, with in-hospital mortality rates, modified Rankin Scale and procedure uses.

Results: From a total of 27 631 stroke cases (44.3% women, median age 75 years (IQR 66-83)), no statistically significant changes were observed in the overall count of stroke admissions during the pandemic. A decrease in ischaemic stroke hospitalisations was detected (incidence-rate ratios (95% CI), 0.83 (0.73 to 0.95)), which was somewhat offset by an increasing trend for patients treated in the outpatient setting (1.06 (0.91 to 1.22)). No significant differences were found in in-hospital mortality rate, proportion of severe modified Rankin Scale at discharge and thrombolysis treatment rate. Rates of mechanical thrombectomy in ischaemic stroke were reduced (0.60 (0.36 to 0.99)), and length of stay was reduced for all types of stroke except intracerebral haemorrhage.

Conclusion: When considering both inpatient and outpatient admissions for stroke, we found no statistically significant change in the number of stroke admissions in 2020 in Japan. In addition, our findings suggest that acute stroke inpatient care, at least during 2020, was appropriately managed despite limited resources.

COVID-19期间住院和门诊卒中入院的变化:基于日本242家急症医院索赔数据的差异分析
导论:虽然COVID-19由于其血栓形成和炎症作用而与卒中风险升高相关,但先前的研究报告称,COVID-19期间卒中住院人数有所减少。不能入院的中风患者可以在这些医院的门诊进行随访。我们的研究旨在调查在COVID-19期间住院和门诊的中风患者人数的变化。方法:采用差异中差异设计,利用242家急症医院的理赔数据,对日本卒中入院情况进行调查,并将大流行前(2015-2019年)与大流行期间(2020年)进行对比。日本政府于2020年4月宣布进入紧急状态,被认为是一种外生冲击。结果是缺血性卒中(栓塞性和非栓塞性)、脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血入院人数、住院死亡率、修改的兰金量表和手术方法的使用。结果:在27631例卒中病例中(44.3%为女性,中位年龄75岁(IQR 66-83)),大流行期间卒中入院总人数未观察到统计学上显著的变化。发现缺血性卒中住院率下降(发病率比(95% CI), 0.83(0.73至0.95)),这在一定程度上被门诊治疗患者的增加趋势所抵消(1.06(0.91至1.22))。两组住院死亡率、出院时严重修正Rankin量表比例及溶栓治疗率均无显著差异。缺血性脑卒中机械取栓率降低(0.60(0.36 ~ 0.99)),除脑出血外,所有类型脑卒中的住院时间均缩短。结论:当考虑卒中住院和门诊入院时,我们发现2020年日本卒中入院人数没有统计学上的显著变化。此外,我们的研究结果表明,尽管资源有限,但至少在2020年期间,急性卒中住院治疗得到了适当的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信