Reducing hospital length of stay with criteria-led transfer from the acute stroke unit to inpatient rehabilitation.

IF 2.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2025-001316
Peishan Cai, Karen Stephens, Jane D'Souza, Louisa Soh, Emily Schembri, Philip Mc Choi
{"title":"Reducing hospital length of stay with criteria-led transfer from the acute stroke unit to inpatient rehabilitation.","authors":"Peishan Cai, Karen Stephens, Jane D'Souza, Louisa Soh, Emily Schembri, Philip Mc Choi","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2025-001316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Criteria-led transfer allows transfer of select stroke patients to inpatient rehabilitation without rehabilitation physician review, which may be a barrier for timely transfers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Primary: determine the proportion of patients transferred via criteria-led transfer and waitlist time. Secondary: determine the number of unplanned 30-day acute hospital representations and readmissions from inpatient rehabilitation, and number of daily allied health contacts while waitlisted.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients transferred from the acute stroke unit to inpatient rehabilitation in 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>178 (79%) patients successfully used criteria-led transfer, 22 (9.5%) did not meet criteria and the remainder attended inpatient rehabilitation via a separate pathway. Median waitlist time (in days) was shorter for criteria led transfer patients compared with those who did not meet criteria (3 (1-5) vs 5 (3-8), p=0.005). Emergency department representation rates were lower in the criteria-led transfer cohort (30 (16.9%) vs 8 (36.3%), p=0.03) compared with those who did not meet criteria. No difference in readmission rates was seen (p=0.22). Waitlisted patients received 1 (0.5-1.5) allied health reviews daily.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Criteria-led transfer is associated with shorter waitlist times for transfer to rehabilitation without increased adverse events. Further research is needed to determine result generalisability.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"e001316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12481387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2025-001316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Criteria-led transfer allows transfer of select stroke patients to inpatient rehabilitation without rehabilitation physician review, which may be a barrier for timely transfers.

Objective: Primary: determine the proportion of patients transferred via criteria-led transfer and waitlist time. Secondary: determine the number of unplanned 30-day acute hospital representations and readmissions from inpatient rehabilitation, and number of daily allied health contacts while waitlisted.

Method: A single-centre retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients transferred from the acute stroke unit to inpatient rehabilitation in 2023.

Results: 178 (79%) patients successfully used criteria-led transfer, 22 (9.5%) did not meet criteria and the remainder attended inpatient rehabilitation via a separate pathway. Median waitlist time (in days) was shorter for criteria led transfer patients compared with those who did not meet criteria (3 (1-5) vs 5 (3-8), p=0.005). Emergency department representation rates were lower in the criteria-led transfer cohort (30 (16.9%) vs 8 (36.3%), p=0.03) compared with those who did not meet criteria. No difference in readmission rates was seen (p=0.22). Waitlisted patients received 1 (0.5-1.5) allied health reviews daily.

Conclusions: Criteria-led transfer is associated with shorter waitlist times for transfer to rehabilitation without increased adverse events. Further research is needed to determine result generalisability.

以标准为导向的从急性脑卒中单元到住院康复的转移减少住院时间。
背景:以标准为导向的转院允许选择的脑卒中患者在没有康复医师复查的情况下转到住院康复,这可能是及时转院的障碍。目的:主要:确定通过标准引导转院的患者比例和等待时间。次要:确定计划外的30天急性住院就诊和住院康复再入院的数量,以及等候名单期间每日联合健康联系的数量。方法:对2023年转入急性脑卒中住院康复的患者进行单中心回顾性分析。结果:178例(79%)患者成功使用标准引导的转移,22例(9.5%)患者不符合标准,其余患者通过单独的途径进行住院康复。与不符合标准的转移患者相比,符合标准的转移患者的中位等待时间(以天为单位)更短(3 (1-5)vs 5 (3-8), p=0.005)。与不符合标准的患者相比,以标准为主导的转院队列的急诊科代表率较低(30人(16.9%)vs 8人(36.3%),p=0.03)。两组再入院率无差异(p=0.22)。等候名单患者每天接受1次(0.5-1.5次)联合健康检查。结论:以标准为导向的转移与转移到康复的等待时间缩短有关,而不会增加不良事件。需要进一步的研究来确定结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信