Strategic robot adoption to improve work efficiency and safety in elderly care: Insights from mixed-method approach.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hyunmi Shin, Min Jae Park
{"title":"Strategic robot adoption to improve work efficiency and safety in elderly care: Insights from mixed-method approach.","authors":"Hyunmi Shin, Min Jae Park","doi":"10.1177/10519815251382183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundElderly care facilities increasingly face labor shortages, physically demanding tasks, and a growing need for consistent service quality. Robotic technologies have the potential to alleviate workforce strain and improve care delivery, yet their effective adoption requires careful prioritization and planning.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify key strategic factors that influence the adoption of robots in elderly care settings, focusing on improving workforce efficiency, safety, and standardization through a structured, decision-making framework.MethodsUsing the 4Ps innovation framework (Product, Process, People, and Place/Promotion), this research employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with 80 nursing hospitals, along with expert Focus Group Interviews (FGIs), to assess the relative importance of factors driving robot adoption in caregiving environments.ResultsStandardization and task homogenization were identified as top priorities for minimizing errors and enhancing service consistency. The study proposes a multi-stage implementation strategy, beginning with pilot adoption of simple-function robots and progressing toward complex applications aligned with institutional readiness. Key influencing factors include people innovation (reducing workforce burden) and process innovation (streamlining operations).ConclusionsThis study provides actionable insights into the strategic deployment of robotic services in elderly care facilities. The findings support phased robot integration as a means to enhance workforce support, promote operational safety, and ensure quality care for aging populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10519815251382183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10519815251382183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundElderly care facilities increasingly face labor shortages, physically demanding tasks, and a growing need for consistent service quality. Robotic technologies have the potential to alleviate workforce strain and improve care delivery, yet their effective adoption requires careful prioritization and planning.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify key strategic factors that influence the adoption of robots in elderly care settings, focusing on improving workforce efficiency, safety, and standardization through a structured, decision-making framework.MethodsUsing the 4Ps innovation framework (Product, Process, People, and Place/Promotion), this research employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with 80 nursing hospitals, along with expert Focus Group Interviews (FGIs), to assess the relative importance of factors driving robot adoption in caregiving environments.ResultsStandardization and task homogenization were identified as top priorities for minimizing errors and enhancing service consistency. The study proposes a multi-stage implementation strategy, beginning with pilot adoption of simple-function robots and progressing toward complex applications aligned with institutional readiness. Key influencing factors include people innovation (reducing workforce burden) and process innovation (streamlining operations).ConclusionsThis study provides actionable insights into the strategic deployment of robotic services in elderly care facilities. The findings support phased robot integration as a means to enhance workforce support, promote operational safety, and ensure quality care for aging populations.

战略性采用机器人提高老年护理的工作效率和安全性:来自混合方法的见解。
养老机构日益面临劳动力短缺、体力要求高的任务以及对持续服务质量日益增长的需求。机器人技术有可能缓解劳动力压力并改善护理服务,但它们的有效采用需要仔细的优先级和规划。本研究旨在确定影响老年人护理机构采用机器人的关键战略因素,重点是通过结构化的决策框架提高劳动力效率、安全性和标准化。方法采用4Ps创新框架(产品、流程、人员和地点/晋升),本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)对80家护理医院进行调查,并结合专家焦点小组访谈(fgi),评估推动机器人在护理环境中采用的因素的相对重要性。结果标准化和任务同质化是减少错误和提高服务一致性的首要任务。该研究提出了一个多阶段实施策略,从试点采用简单功能的机器人开始,逐步向与机构准备一致的复杂应用发展。关键的影响因素包括人员创新(减少劳动力负担)和流程创新(简化操作)。结论本研究为机器人服务在老年护理机构的战略部署提供了可操作的见解。研究结果支持将分阶段机器人集成作为加强劳动力支持、促进操作安全性和确保老年人口优质护理的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信