Addressing Psychiatric Bed Capacity: Evidence From Medicaid's Institutions for Mental Disease Waivers for Serious Mental Illness.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
K John McConnell, Jane M Zhu, Thomas H A Meath, Stephan Lindner
{"title":"Addressing Psychiatric Bed Capacity: Evidence From Medicaid's Institutions for Mental Disease Waivers for Serious Mental Illness.","authors":"K John McConnell, Jane M Zhu, Thomas H A Meath, Stephan Lindner","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the adoption of Section 1115 Serious Mental Illness and Serious Emotional Disturbance (SMI/SED) Medicaid waivers was associated with increased bed capacity among freestanding psychiatric hospitals.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We used a difference-in-differences design to study changes in bed capacity in freestanding psychiatric hospitals across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, comparing states that adopted waivers to those that did not.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>We used data from the National Mental Health Services Survey, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider of Service files, and other state-level datasets from 2014 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Freestanding hospitals were responsible for most of the growth of psychiatric inpatient bed capacity over the last 10 years. We found no correlation between the option to pursue an SMI/SED waiver and bed capacity or other measures of mental health needs, including state-based estimates of SMI prevalence or suicide rates. In our difference-in-differences analyses, we found no association between the adoption of SMI/SED waivers and bed capacity in freestanding psychiatric hospitals. For example, our estimate of the association of SMI/SED waivers with changes in beds in psychiatric hospitals that accepted Medicaid was -24 beds per 100,000 Medicaid-enrolled adults (95% CI: -115, 67). Other specifications and outcome variables yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While SMI/SED waivers offer the potential to address psychiatric bed shortages, these waivers alone may not suffice to increase inpatient capacity. Given the low uptake and absence of significant change in bed capacity, SMI/SED waivers may need to be redesigned to meet the growing mental health needs of the Medicaid population.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70051"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the adoption of Section 1115 Serious Mental Illness and Serious Emotional Disturbance (SMI/SED) Medicaid waivers was associated with increased bed capacity among freestanding psychiatric hospitals.

Study setting and design: We used a difference-in-differences design to study changes in bed capacity in freestanding psychiatric hospitals across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, comparing states that adopted waivers to those that did not.

Data sources and analytic sample: We used data from the National Mental Health Services Survey, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider of Service files, and other state-level datasets from 2014 to 2023.

Principal findings: Freestanding hospitals were responsible for most of the growth of psychiatric inpatient bed capacity over the last 10 years. We found no correlation between the option to pursue an SMI/SED waiver and bed capacity or other measures of mental health needs, including state-based estimates of SMI prevalence or suicide rates. In our difference-in-differences analyses, we found no association between the adoption of SMI/SED waivers and bed capacity in freestanding psychiatric hospitals. For example, our estimate of the association of SMI/SED waivers with changes in beds in psychiatric hospitals that accepted Medicaid was -24 beds per 100,000 Medicaid-enrolled adults (95% CI: -115, 67). Other specifications and outcome variables yielded similar results.

Conclusion: While SMI/SED waivers offer the potential to address psychiatric bed shortages, these waivers alone may not suffice to increase inpatient capacity. Given the low uptake and absence of significant change in bed capacity, SMI/SED waivers may need to be redesigned to meet the growing mental health needs of the Medicaid population.

解决精神病病床容量:来自医疗补助机构的证据,精神疾病豁免严重精神疾病。
目的:评估采用1115节严重精神疾病和严重情绪障碍(SMI/SED)医疗补助豁免是否与独立精神病院床位容量增加有关。研究设置和设计:我们采用差异中的差异设计来研究所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区的独立精神病院床位容量的变化,并比较采用豁免的州和未采用豁免的州。数据来源和分析样本:我们使用的数据来自2014年至2023年的国家精神卫生服务调查、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心服务提供商文件和其他国家级数据集。主要发现:在过去10年里,精神病住院床位的增长大部分是由独立医院造成的。我们发现,选择放弃重度精神分裂症/SED与床位容量或其他心理健康需求指标(包括基于州的重度精神分裂症患病率或自杀率估计)之间没有相关性。在我们的差异分析中,我们发现在独立精神病院的床位容量与SMI/SED豁免的采用之间没有关联。例如,我们估计,在接受医疗补助的精神病医院中,SMI/SED豁免与床位变化的关系是每10万名参加医疗补助的成年人中有-24张床位(95% CI: - 115,67)。其他规格和结果变量也产生了类似的结果。结论:虽然SMI/SED豁免提供了解决精神科床位短缺问题的潜力,但仅凭这些豁免可能不足以增加住院病人的容量。鉴于使用率低且床位容量没有显著变化,SMI/SED豁免可能需要重新设计,以满足医疗补助人群日益增长的心理健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信