Information Prioritization and Reading Patterns in Electronic Health Record Nursing Summaries: An Eye-Tracking Case Study.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2688-4056
Suhyun Park, Jenna L Marquard, Robin R Austin, Christie L Martin, David S Pieczkiewicz, Connie W Delaney
{"title":"Information Prioritization and Reading Patterns in Electronic Health Record Nursing Summaries: An Eye-Tracking Case Study.","authors":"Suhyun Park, Jenna L Marquard, Robin R Austin, Christie L Martin, David S Pieczkiewicz, Connie W Delaney","doi":"10.1055/a-2688-4056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While nursing summaries in electronic health records are used for initial orientation to a patient's status, research on nurses' use of these summaries remains scarce. This case study conducted an eye-tracking simulation to identify (1) key information types (orders, vital signs, etc.), (2) frequently paired information types, and (3) common sequential patterns of information types within nursing summaries as nurses review simulated patient cases.We recruited 33 medical-surgical nurses from a university hospital. As part of an eye-tracking simulation, they reviewed three simulated patients' nursing summaries. A screen-based eye-tracker was used to capture participants' gaze fixation on different information types. For analysis, we used discrete-time Markov chains and sequential pattern mining.The average total gaze fixation time was 1.77 minutes from 26 analyzed participants' eye gaze data. Most of this time was spent shifting between information types or making notes. \"Orders\" and \"Sidebar\" (mini summary of demographics and health status) were the information types that consistently emerged as key areas of focus. Participants tended to read specific information types in pairs and followed a top-to-bottom order of reading on the screen.When reviewing unfamiliar patient cases, nurses prefer to construct a comprehensive patient narrative. Nursing summaries can be redesigned by prioritizing key information types, grouping relevant information pairs, and arranging information in a top-to-bottom manner based on relevance. We recommend that hospitals and EHR vendors prioritize the customization of nursing summaries to align with nurses' information needs and workflows. Tailored summary layout improvements beyond a one-size-fits-all design, informed by interdisciplinary collaboration, can enhance information reading efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"1252-1262"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2688-4056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While nursing summaries in electronic health records are used for initial orientation to a patient's status, research on nurses' use of these summaries remains scarce. This case study conducted an eye-tracking simulation to identify (1) key information types (orders, vital signs, etc.), (2) frequently paired information types, and (3) common sequential patterns of information types within nursing summaries as nurses review simulated patient cases.We recruited 33 medical-surgical nurses from a university hospital. As part of an eye-tracking simulation, they reviewed three simulated patients' nursing summaries. A screen-based eye-tracker was used to capture participants' gaze fixation on different information types. For analysis, we used discrete-time Markov chains and sequential pattern mining.The average total gaze fixation time was 1.77 minutes from 26 analyzed participants' eye gaze data. Most of this time was spent shifting between information types or making notes. "Orders" and "Sidebar" (mini summary of demographics and health status) were the information types that consistently emerged as key areas of focus. Participants tended to read specific information types in pairs and followed a top-to-bottom order of reading on the screen.When reviewing unfamiliar patient cases, nurses prefer to construct a comprehensive patient narrative. Nursing summaries can be redesigned by prioritizing key information types, grouping relevant information pairs, and arranging information in a top-to-bottom manner based on relevance. We recommend that hospitals and EHR vendors prioritize the customization of nursing summaries to align with nurses' information needs and workflows. Tailored summary layout improvements beyond a one-size-fits-all design, informed by interdisciplinary collaboration, can enhance information reading efficiency.

电子健康记录护理摘要中的信息优先级和阅读模式:眼动追踪案例研究。
虽然电子健康记录中的护理摘要用于初步了解患者的状态,但对护士使用这些摘要的研究仍然很少。本案例研究通过眼动模拟来识别(1)关键信息类型(医嘱、生命体征等),(2)频繁配对的信息类型,(3)护士回顾模拟患者病例时护理总结中常见的信息类型顺序模式。我们从一所大学医院招募了33名内科外科护士。作为眼动追踪模拟的一部分,他们回顾了三个模拟病人的护理总结。使用基于屏幕的眼动仪来捕捉参与者对不同信息类型的注视。为了进行分析,我们使用了离散时间马尔可夫链和顺序模式挖掘。从分析的26名参与者的眼睛注视数据来看,平均总注视时间为1.77分钟。大部分时间都花在了转换信息类型或做笔记上。“订单”和“侧边栏”(人口统计和健康状况的小型摘要)是一直作为重点领域出现的信息类型。参与者倾向于成对阅读特定类型的信息,并遵循屏幕上从上到下的阅读顺序。当回顾不熟悉的病人病例时,护士更喜欢构建一个全面的病人叙述。护理摘要可以通过对关键信息类型进行优先排序、对相关信息对进行分组、根据相关性从上到下排列信息等方式进行重新设计。我们建议医院和电子病历供应商优先考虑定制护理摘要,以配合护士的信息需求和工作流程。量身定制的摘要布局改进超越了一刀切的设计,通过跨学科协作,可以提高信息阅读效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信