Decomposing Medicare total, Part D, and Part B drug payments among people with Alzheimer's disease and related diseases.

IF 2.7
Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf179
Jie Chen, Seyeon Jang
{"title":"Decomposing Medicare total, Part D, and Part B drug payments among people with Alzheimer's disease and related diseases.","authors":"Jie Chen, Seyeon Jang","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to examine the extent to which health status, socioeconomic characteristics, and access to needed medications contribute to differences in total Medicare costs and drug spending among beneficiaries with and without Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data from 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022, linked with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey, to examine factors associated with total Medicare spending, Part D drug spending, and Part B drug costs. Decomposition analysis was conducted to quantify the contribution of individual characteristics to observed cost differences by ADRD status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our model explained 48% of the total Medicare spending difference and 80% of the Part D drug cost gap between beneficiaries with and without ADRD. Depression, heart disease, self-reported poor health, and functional limitations were major contributors to total spending differences. Dual eligibility was a primary driver of higher Part D costs. However, the model did not adequately explain differences in Part B drug costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions in mental health, cardiovascular care, and pharmaceutical policy. Further research is needed to better understand unmeasured drivers of Medicare spending, especially physician-administered drug costs under Part B, among beneficiaries with ADRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 9","pages":"qxaf179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12482227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to examine the extent to which health status, socioeconomic characteristics, and access to needed medications contribute to differences in total Medicare costs and drug spending among beneficiaries with and without Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD).

Methods: We used Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data from 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022, linked with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey, to examine factors associated with total Medicare spending, Part D drug spending, and Part B drug costs. Decomposition analysis was conducted to quantify the contribution of individual characteristics to observed cost differences by ADRD status.

Results: Our model explained 48% of the total Medicare spending difference and 80% of the Part D drug cost gap between beneficiaries with and without ADRD. Depression, heart disease, self-reported poor health, and functional limitations were major contributors to total spending differences. Dual eligibility was a primary driver of higher Part D costs. However, the model did not adequately explain differences in Part B drug costs.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions in mental health, cardiovascular care, and pharmaceutical policy. Further research is needed to better understand unmeasured drivers of Medicare spending, especially physician-administered drug costs under Part B, among beneficiaries with ADRD.

分解老年痴呆症和相关疾病患者的医疗保险总额、D部分和B部分药物支付。
本研究旨在研究健康状况、社会经济特征和所需药物的可及性在多大程度上影响患有和不患有阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆(ADRD)的受益人的医疗保险总成本和药物支出的差异。方法:我们使用2018年、2019年、2021年和2022年的医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)索赔数据,并结合消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统的评估(CAHPS)调查,研究与医疗保险总支出、D部分药物支出和B部分药物成本相关的因素。通过分解分析,量化个体特征对ADRD状态下观察到的成本差异的贡献。结果:我们的模型解释了有和没有ADRD的受益人之间48%的医疗保险总支出差异和80%的D部分药品成本差距。抑郁症、心脏病、自我报告的健康状况不佳和功能限制是造成总支出差异的主要原因。双重资格是D部分费用增加的主要原因。然而,该模型并没有充分解释B部分药品成本的差异。结论:这些发现强调了在心理健康、心血管保健和药物政策方面进行有针对性干预的必要性。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解医疗保险支出的未测量驱动因素,特别是在患有ADRD的受益人中,根据B部分,医生管理的药物成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信