Strengthening integration of pathways into general practice in Australia: a virtual workshop study with stakeholders.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0074
Faith Yong, Priya Martin, Sneha Kirubakaran, Katharine Ann Wallis, Riitta Partanen, Jordan Fox, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan, Matthew McGrail
{"title":"Strengthening integration of pathways into general practice in Australia: a virtual workshop study with stakeholders.","authors":"Faith Yong, Priya Martin, Sneha Kirubakaran, Katharine Ann Wallis, Riitta Partanen, Jordan Fox, Srinivas Kondalsamy Chennakesavan, Matthew McGrail","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There remains an urgent need for more medical graduates choosing general practice to address expanding general practitioner (GP) workforce shortages. Priority interventions remain unclear but strengthened integration of medical training pathways into general practice may help.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore stakeholder views on ways to strengthen integration of pathways into general practice across the medical education and training pipeline.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Participatory research virtual workshop. Participants were purposively sampled to include representation across the Australian medical education and GP training sector.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a nominal group technique, participants were prompted to generate suggestions in activities that build upon known factors, and to discuss proposed new and modified solutions to the GP shortage. Content analysis and synthesis supported iterative review of the categorisation framework until team consensus was reached.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 participants (four workshops) made 145 suggestions, which were refined to 67 proposed interventions. There were three overarching categories: 1) improved equity in pay and status for GP trainees and specialists; 2) increased systemic exposure to general practice and generalism; and 3) clearer pathway options to general practice and generalism.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General practice pathways could be strengthened by increased exposure to general practice working conditions and generalism philosophies, along with clearer transitions between different training stages. However, increased equity of resources and the status of general practice within medical specialties were also very important macro factors, beyond education and training alone. Thus, GP pathway interventions require reconfiguration supporting integration into the medical training system to actively value GP healthcare contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There remains an urgent need for more medical graduates choosing general practice to address expanding general practitioner (GP) workforce shortages. Priority interventions remain unclear but strengthened integration of medical training pathways into general practice may help.

Aim: To explore stakeholder views on ways to strengthen integration of pathways into general practice across the medical education and training pipeline.

Design & setting: Participatory research virtual workshop. Participants were purposively sampled to include representation across the Australian medical education and GP training sector.

Method: Using a nominal group technique, participants were prompted to generate suggestions in activities that build upon known factors, and to discuss proposed new and modified solutions to the GP shortage. Content analysis and synthesis supported iterative review of the categorisation framework until team consensus was reached.

Results: 17 participants (four workshops) made 145 suggestions, which were refined to 67 proposed interventions. There were three overarching categories: 1) improved equity in pay and status for GP trainees and specialists; 2) increased systemic exposure to general practice and generalism; and 3) clearer pathway options to general practice and generalism.

Conclusion: General practice pathways could be strengthened by increased exposure to general practice working conditions and generalism philosophies, along with clearer transitions between different training stages. However, increased equity of resources and the status of general practice within medical specialties were also very important macro factors, beyond education and training alone. Thus, GP pathway interventions require reconfiguration supporting integration into the medical training system to actively value GP healthcare contributions.

加强途径整合到一般做法在澳大利亚:与利益相关者的虚拟研讨会研究。
背景:迫切需要更多的医学毕业生选择全科医生,以解决不断扩大的全科医生(GP)劳动力短缺问题。优先干预措施尚不清楚,但加强医学培训途径与全科实践的整合可能会有所帮助。目的:探讨利益相关方对如何在整个医学教育和培训管道中加强全科实践整合途径的看法。设计与设置:参与式研究虚拟工作坊。参与者有目的地抽样,包括澳大利亚医学教育和全科医生培训部门的代表。方法:使用名义上的小组技术,促使参与者在活动中根据已知因素提出建议,并讨论针对GP短缺提出的新的和修改的解决方案。内容分析和综合支持分类框架的迭代评审,直到团队达成共识。结果:17位参与者(4个工作坊)提出了145条建议,这些建议被提炼为67条建议干预措施。主要有三个方面:1)提高全科医生实习生和专家的薪酬和地位的公平性;2)增加对全科医生和全科医生的系统性接触;3)更清晰的全科医生和全科医生的路径选择。结论:全科实习途径可以通过增加对全科实习工作条件和全科哲学的接触,以及不同培训阶段之间更清晰的过渡来加强。然而,除了教育和培训之外,资源更加公平和全科执业在医学专业中的地位也是非常重要的宏观因素。因此,全科医生路径干预需要重新配置,支持整合到医疗培训系统中,以积极评价全科医生的医疗保健贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信