Evaluation of the reproducibility of automatic exposure control systems in general X-ray machines using a coin-based method.

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Thunyarat Chusin, Ratima Wongchai, Sararat Moonkham, Thanyawee Pengpan, Kingkarn Aphiwatthanasumet
{"title":"Evaluation of the reproducibility of automatic exposure control systems in general X-ray machines using a coin-based method.","authors":"Thunyarat Chusin, Ratima Wongchai, Sararat Moonkham, Thanyawee Pengpan, Kingkarn Aphiwatthanasumet","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00973-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Automatic exposure control (AEC) in digital radiography adjusts exposure time based on the chosen milliamperage (mA) and the patient's anatomical characteristics, ensuring the delivery of an appropriate radiation dose for optimal image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of AEC systems in general X-ray machines under various conditions. AEC reproducibility was assessed in two general X-ray machines: the SIEMENS Multix Top and the DRGEM GXR-40S. Both systems offer three sensitivity settings (high, medium, and low). A stack of Thai ten-baht coins, consisting of one and five layers, was used as a test object and placed directly over the AEC sensor. Ten exposures were carried out for repeated measurements. Differences in mAs values and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results showed that mAs values changed in response to tube voltage, sensitivity setting, object thickness, and sensor position; however, these variations remained within acceptable limits. A higher mAs value was observed at lower tube voltages (80-81 kVp), a lower sensitivity setting (D or Slow), and a five-layer coin thickness. No significant differences were observed at higher tube voltage (100 kVp) and higher sensitivity (H or Fast; p > 0.05). In conclusion, AEC reproducibility testing showed mean mAs ranges of 0.51-3.25 with a maximum CV of 2.60% for SIEMENS, and 0.37-1.62 with a maximum CV of 3.37% for DRGEM. Both systems met international standard guidelines, with a CV below 5.00%, as recommended by AAPM Report No. 150, confirming consistent mAs values under various conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00973-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automatic exposure control (AEC) in digital radiography adjusts exposure time based on the chosen milliamperage (mA) and the patient's anatomical characteristics, ensuring the delivery of an appropriate radiation dose for optimal image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of AEC systems in general X-ray machines under various conditions. AEC reproducibility was assessed in two general X-ray machines: the SIEMENS Multix Top and the DRGEM GXR-40S. Both systems offer three sensitivity settings (high, medium, and low). A stack of Thai ten-baht coins, consisting of one and five layers, was used as a test object and placed directly over the AEC sensor. Ten exposures were carried out for repeated measurements. Differences in mAs values and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated, and statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results showed that mAs values changed in response to tube voltage, sensitivity setting, object thickness, and sensor position; however, these variations remained within acceptable limits. A higher mAs value was observed at lower tube voltages (80-81 kVp), a lower sensitivity setting (D or Slow), and a five-layer coin thickness. No significant differences were observed at higher tube voltage (100 kVp) and higher sensitivity (H or Fast; p > 0.05). In conclusion, AEC reproducibility testing showed mean mAs ranges of 0.51-3.25 with a maximum CV of 2.60% for SIEMENS, and 0.37-1.62 with a maximum CV of 3.37% for DRGEM. Both systems met international standard guidelines, with a CV below 5.00%, as recommended by AAPM Report No. 150, confirming consistent mAs values under various conditions.

用投币法评价普通x光机自动曝光控制系统的再现性。
数字放射照相中的自动曝光控制(AEC)根据所选择的毫安(mA)和患者的解剖特征调整曝光时间,确保提供适当的辐射剂量以获得最佳图像质量。本研究旨在评估AEC系统在不同条件下在普通x射线机上的再现性。在西门子Multix Top和DRGEM GXR-40S两种通用x光机上评估AEC的再现性。两种系统都提供三种灵敏度设置(高、中、低)。一堆由一层和五层组成的十泰铢硬币被用作测试对象,直接放置在AEC传感器上。进行了10次暴露以重复测量。计算mAs值和变异系数(CV)的差异,采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计分析。结果表明,mAs值随管电压、灵敏度设置、物体厚度和传感器位置的变化而变化;然而,这些变化仍然在可接受的范围内。在较低的管电压(80-81 kVp)、较低的灵敏度设置(D或Slow)和五层硬币厚度下观察到较高的mAs值。在更高的管电压(100 kVp)和更高的灵敏度(H或Fast; p < 0.05)下,未观察到显著差异。综上所述,AEC重复性试验结果表明,SIEMENS的平均mAs范围为0.51 ~ 3.25,最大CV为2.60%;DRGEM的平均mAs范围为0.37 ~ 1.62,最大CV为3.37%。这两种系统都符合国际标准指导方针,CV低于5.00%,正如AAPM报告第150号所建议的那样,在各种条件下确认了一致的mAs值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信