Understanding and improving compound pressures in general practice: a realist review protocol.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0073
Emily Owen-Boukra, Ruth Abrams, Tanya Cohen, Claire Goodman, Cecily Henry, Laura Ingle, Kamal Mahtani, Margaret Ogden, Nia Wyn Roberts, Rupesh Shah, James Thomas, Geoff Wong, Sophie Park
{"title":"Understanding and improving compound pressures in general practice: a realist review protocol.","authors":"Emily Owen-Boukra, Ruth Abrams, Tanya Cohen, Claire Goodman, Cecily Henry, Laura Ingle, Kamal Mahtani, Margaret Ogden, Nia Wyn Roberts, Rupesh Shah, James Thomas, Geoff Wong, Sophie Park","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compound Pressures (CP) significantly impact the role of General Practice (GP) in supporting human health. These pressures include climate change, pandemics, and financial crises. CP can be predictable, pre-determined, or unpredictable in nature and scope. Strategies to address the demands arising from CP range from short-term initiatives to buffering existing GP systems to ensure flexible and agile resources. Interventions designed to prevent, identify, and manage CP may result in both intended and unintended outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct a realist appreciative inquiry, realist review, and three embedded studies within a review (SWAR) about CP affecting GP and the delivery of effective, equitable patient care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Realist appreciative inquiry, realist review, and three SWARS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We will conduct a realist appreciative inquiry facilitating patient and stakeholder input into the review scope, focus, and initial programme theory development. This approach emphasises the identification of assets, successes, hopes, and aspirations to enable positive change. Based on these insights, we will conduct a realist review of empirical and grey literature. This project includes three elements of methodological innovation (SWARs). First, evaluation of how appreciative inquiry can inform initial programme theory development. Two further SWARs will examine how artificial intelligence might a) support the identification of relevant resources at title and abstract, and full-text stages, and b) support data extraction and analysis in future realist reviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research aims to understand the effects of CP on GP, supporting preparation and solutions that can inform future policies, interventions, and support systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compound Pressures (CP) significantly impact the role of General Practice (GP) in supporting human health. These pressures include climate change, pandemics, and financial crises. CP can be predictable, pre-determined, or unpredictable in nature and scope. Strategies to address the demands arising from CP range from short-term initiatives to buffering existing GP systems to ensure flexible and agile resources. Interventions designed to prevent, identify, and manage CP may result in both intended and unintended outcomes.

Aim: To conduct a realist appreciative inquiry, realist review, and three embedded studies within a review (SWAR) about CP affecting GP and the delivery of effective, equitable patient care.

Design & setting: Realist appreciative inquiry, realist review, and three SWARS.

Method: We will conduct a realist appreciative inquiry facilitating patient and stakeholder input into the review scope, focus, and initial programme theory development. This approach emphasises the identification of assets, successes, hopes, and aspirations to enable positive change. Based on these insights, we will conduct a realist review of empirical and grey literature. This project includes three elements of methodological innovation (SWARs). First, evaluation of how appreciative inquiry can inform initial programme theory development. Two further SWARs will examine how artificial intelligence might a) support the identification of relevant resources at title and abstract, and full-text stages, and b) support data extraction and analysis in future realist reviews.

Conclusion: Our research aims to understand the effects of CP on GP, supporting preparation and solutions that can inform future policies, interventions, and support systems.

理解和改进一般实践中的复合压力:一个现实的审查方案。
背景:复合压力(CP)显著影响全科医生(GP)在支持人类健康方面的作用。这些压力包括气候变化、流行病和金融危机。CP在性质和范围上可以是可预测的、预先确定的或不可预测的。解决CP需求的策略包括从短期举措到缓冲现有GP系统以确保灵活和敏捷的资源。旨在预防、识别和管理CP的干预措施可能会导致预期和意外的结果。目的:对CP影响全科医生和提供有效、公平的患者护理进行现实主义的欣赏性调查、现实主义的回顾和三个嵌入研究(SWAR)。设计与设置:现实主义欣赏探究,现实主义回顾,三个SWARS。方法:我们将进行现实主义的鉴赏性调查,促进患者和利益相关者对审查范围、重点和初步方案理论发展的投入。这种方法强调对资产、成功、希望和愿望的识别,以实现积极的变化。基于这些见解,我们将对实证文献和灰色文献进行现实主义回顾。该项目包括方法论创新(SWARs)的三个要素。首先,评估欣赏性探究如何为最初的程序理论发展提供信息。另外两个SWARs将研究人工智能如何在标题、摘要和全文阶段支持相关资源的识别,以及b)支持未来现实主义评论中的数据提取和分析。结论:我们的研究旨在了解CP对GP的影响,支持准备和解决方案,可以为未来的政策、干预和支持系统提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信