Characterization of Spirometric Response to Standard-of-care Treatment in Lung Allograft Recipients With Bronchiolitis Obliterans and the Utility of Spirometric Criteria for Rescue Therapy: Implications for the Design of Risk-stratified Clinical Trials.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Derek E Byers, Ramsey Hachem, Chadi A Hage, Rajat Walia, Hilary Goldberg, Mrunal Patel, John Reynolds, Julia Klesney-Tait, Selim Arcasoy, Chetan Naik, Nicoe De Simone, Amena Usmani, Reda Girgis, Francis Cordova, Brian Keller, David Nunley, Jagadish Patil, Matthew Morrell, Elizabeth Lendermon, Howard Huang, Andres Pelaez, Amir Emtazoo, Keith Wille, Kevin Chan, Gordon Yung, Maher Baz, Shambhu Aryal, Suresh Vedantham, Mary Clare Derfler, Paul Commean, Keith Berman, Andrew Atkinson, Jeff Atkinson, Alexey Prokudin, John McCarthy, George J Despotis
{"title":"Characterization of Spirometric Response to Standard-of-care Treatment in Lung Allograft Recipients With Bronchiolitis Obliterans and the Utility of Spirometric Criteria for Rescue Therapy: Implications for the Design of Risk-stratified Clinical Trials.","authors":"Derek E Byers, Ramsey Hachem, Chadi A Hage, Rajat Walia, Hilary Goldberg, Mrunal Patel, John Reynolds, Julia Klesney-Tait, Selim Arcasoy, Chetan Naik, Nicoe De Simone, Amena Usmani, Reda Girgis, Francis Cordova, Brian Keller, David Nunley, Jagadish Patil, Matthew Morrell, Elizabeth Lendermon, Howard Huang, Andres Pelaez, Amir Emtazoo, Keith Wille, Kevin Chan, Gordon Yung, Maher Baz, Shambhu Aryal, Suresh Vedantham, Mary Clare Derfler, Paul Commean, Keith Berman, Andrew Atkinson, Jeff Atkinson, Alexey Prokudin, John McCarthy, George J Despotis","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The spirometric response to standard-of-care (SOC) immunosuppressive therapy for the management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) has been sparsely reported in the literature. Data from a Medicare-approved Registry were analyzed to characterize the effectiveness/durability of a wide range of SOC interventions to manage the decline of lung function and to validate the study spirometric criteria for initiation of rescue therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lung transplant recipients with refractory BOS at 21 US collaborating centers were enrolled in the Registry. Data included both nonspirometric (eg, demographic, Immunosuppressive Regimens for management of BOS) and spirometric parameters (ie, FEV1 measurements and derived indices). The utility of study forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) criteria for treatment (ie, statistically significant rate of FEV1 decline >30 mL/mo) was evaluated by comparing the spirometric course between participants who met or did not meet this criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 21% of participants treated with SOC therapy had >50% decrease (76 ± 25% decrease) in the rate of FEV1 decline. Although 51% of participants had a partial response (rate of FEV1 decline decreased on average 71%), 49% of participants had a substantial increase (mean increase 224%). The FEV1 criterion for treatment was able to identify 19% of participants (48/258) who achieved durable stabilization (ie, nonsignificant rate of FEV1 <30 mL/mo) with SOC therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with BOS have a widely variable response to SOC therapy. Our findings support the use of FEV1 rate of decline to assess response to SOC therapy and to assure appropriate assignment of participants with refractory BOS to rescue therapy treatment cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005515","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The spirometric response to standard-of-care (SOC) immunosuppressive therapy for the management of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) has been sparsely reported in the literature. Data from a Medicare-approved Registry were analyzed to characterize the effectiveness/durability of a wide range of SOC interventions to manage the decline of lung function and to validate the study spirometric criteria for initiation of rescue therapy.

Methods: Lung transplant recipients with refractory BOS at 21 US collaborating centers were enrolled in the Registry. Data included both nonspirometric (eg, demographic, Immunosuppressive Regimens for management of BOS) and spirometric parameters (ie, FEV1 measurements and derived indices). The utility of study forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) criteria for treatment (ie, statistically significant rate of FEV1 decline >30 mL/mo) was evaluated by comparing the spirometric course between participants who met or did not meet this criterion.

Results: Only 21% of participants treated with SOC therapy had >50% decrease (76 ± 25% decrease) in the rate of FEV1 decline. Although 51% of participants had a partial response (rate of FEV1 decline decreased on average 71%), 49% of participants had a substantial increase (mean increase 224%). The FEV1 criterion for treatment was able to identify 19% of participants (48/258) who achieved durable stabilization (ie, nonsignificant rate of FEV1 <30 mL/mo) with SOC therapy.

Conclusions: Patients with BOS have a widely variable response to SOC therapy. Our findings support the use of FEV1 rate of decline to assess response to SOC therapy and to assure appropriate assignment of participants with refractory BOS to rescue therapy treatment cohorts.

肺同种异体移植闭塞性细支气管炎受者对标准治疗的肺活量测定反应的特征和肺活量测定标准在抢救治疗中的应用:风险分层临床试验设计的意义
背景:标准治疗(SOC)免疫抑制治疗闭塞性细支气管炎综合征(BOS)的肺量测定反应在文献中很少报道。分析了来自医疗保险批准注册的数据,以表征广泛的SOC干预措施的有效性/持久性,以管理肺功能下降,并验证了开始抢救治疗的研究肺活量测定标准。方法:将21个美国合作中心的难治性BOS肺移植受者纳入注册表。数据包括非肺活量测定(如人口统计学、用于治疗BOS的免疫抑制方案)和肺活量测定参数(即FEV1测量值和衍生指数)。通过比较符合或不符合该标准的参与者之间的肺活量测定过程,评估研究中1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)标准在治疗中的效用(即FEV1下降率达到30 mL/mo,具有统计学意义)。结果:在接受SOC治疗的参与者中,只有21%的人FEV1下降率下降了50%(76±25%)。尽管51%的参与者有部分反应(FEV1下降率平均下降71%),49%的参与者有显著增加(平均增加224%)。FEV1治疗标准能够识别19%的参与者(48/258)获得持久稳定(即FEV1无显著性)。结论:BOS患者对SOC治疗的反应差异很大。我们的研究结果支持使用FEV1下降率来评估对SOC治疗的反应,并确保将难治性BOS患者适当分配到抢救治疗队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信