Effect of Tear Classification on Subscapularis Muscle Volume: A Deep Learning-based Semi-automatic Analysis of Pre- and Postoperative Changes in 246 Rotator Cuff Repair Patients With and Without First Facet Subscapularis Tears.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-29 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251374303
Kyosun Hwang, Jin Hyeok Lee, Dongkyun Lim, Kanghun Yu, Woong Kyo Jeong
{"title":"Effect of Tear Classification on Subscapularis Muscle Volume: A Deep Learning-based Semi-automatic Analysis of Pre- and Postoperative Changes in 246 Rotator Cuff Repair Patients With and Without First Facet Subscapularis Tears.","authors":"Kyosun Hwang, Jin Hyeok Lee, Dongkyun Lim, Kanghun Yu, Woong Kyo Jeong","doi":"10.1177/23259671251374303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial-thickness subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears, although less studied than full-thickness tears, are prevalent and clinically significant. Recent classifications have proposed subdivisions for these partial-thickness tears. However, their clinical implications and correlation with SSC muscle volume remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate SSC muscle volume in relation to tendon tear classification and assess the changes in muscle volume both pre- and postoperatively using deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 246 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2018 and December 2023. SSC tendon tears were classified using the Yoo and Rhee system. SSC muscle volumes were measured on preoperative MRIs and 6 months postoperatively using a validated deep learning segmentation tool. These volumes were normalized to the scapular volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative normalized SSC volume (nSSC) varied significantly across tear types (F = 7.21; <i>P</i> < .001). Patients with type 2B tears had a significantly lower mean nSSC (1.45 ± 0.40) than those with no tears (1.68 ± 0.37; <i>P</i> = .018) and type 2A tears (1.74 ± 0.31; <i>P</i> = .023). Six months postoperatively, nSSC significantly decreased in patients with SSC tendon tears (nSSC = 1.48 ± 0.34; ΔnSSC = -0.10 ± 0.24; <i>P</i> < .001). For patients with type 2A or more severe tears, nSSC significantly decreased postoperatively in both the debridement (Δ nSSC = -0.13 ± 0.18; <i>P</i> = .004) and repair (Δ nSSC = -0.12 ± 0.29; <i>P</i> = .017) groups. However, the degree of volume change was not significantly different between the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even in partial-thickness tears affecting only the first facet, nSSC muscle volume decreases significantly with increasing tear severity. Furthermore, SSC muscle volume significantly decreases 6 months postoperatively in patients with SSC tendon tears, although the extent of this reduction does not vary among different treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 9","pages":"23259671251374303"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251374303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Partial-thickness subscapularis (SSC) tendon tears, although less studied than full-thickness tears, are prevalent and clinically significant. Recent classifications have proposed subdivisions for these partial-thickness tears. However, their clinical implications and correlation with SSC muscle volume remain poorly understood.

Purpose: To evaluate SSC muscle volume in relation to tendon tear classification and assess the changes in muscle volume both pre- and postoperatively using deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: This study included 246 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair between January 2018 and December 2023. SSC tendon tears were classified using the Yoo and Rhee system. SSC muscle volumes were measured on preoperative MRIs and 6 months postoperatively using a validated deep learning segmentation tool. These volumes were normalized to the scapular volume.

Results: Preoperative normalized SSC volume (nSSC) varied significantly across tear types (F = 7.21; P < .001). Patients with type 2B tears had a significantly lower mean nSSC (1.45 ± 0.40) than those with no tears (1.68 ± 0.37; P = .018) and type 2A tears (1.74 ± 0.31; P = .023). Six months postoperatively, nSSC significantly decreased in patients with SSC tendon tears (nSSC = 1.48 ± 0.34; ΔnSSC = -0.10 ± 0.24; P < .001). For patients with type 2A or more severe tears, nSSC significantly decreased postoperatively in both the debridement (Δ nSSC = -0.13 ± 0.18; P = .004) and repair (Δ nSSC = -0.12 ± 0.29; P = .017) groups. However, the degree of volume change was not significantly different between the treatment groups.

Conclusion: Even in partial-thickness tears affecting only the first facet, nSSC muscle volume decreases significantly with increasing tear severity. Furthermore, SSC muscle volume significantly decreases 6 months postoperatively in patients with SSC tendon tears, although the extent of this reduction does not vary among different treatment modalities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

撕裂分类对肩胛下肌体积的影响:基于深度学习的半自动分析246例肩胛下肌第一小面撕裂和非肩胛下肌撕裂的肩袖修复患者的术前和术后变化。
背景:部分厚度肩胛下肌(SSC)肌腱撕裂,虽然研究较少,但普遍存在且具有临床意义。最近的分类提出了这些部分厚度撕裂的细分。然而,它们的临床意义和与SSC肌肉体积的相关性仍然知之甚少。目的:利用基于深度学习的磁共振成像(MRI)分割技术评估关节镜下肩袖修复患者的SSC肌肉体积与肌腱撕裂分类的关系,并评估术前和术后肌肉体积的变化。研究设计:队列研究;证据水平,3。方法:本研究纳入了2018年1月至2023年12月期间接受关节镜下肩袖修复的246例患者。使用Yoo和Rhee系统对SSC肌腱撕裂进行分类。术前和术后6个月,使用经过验证的深度学习分割工具测量SSC肌肉体积。这些体积与肩胛骨体积归一化。结果:术前归一化SSC体积(nSSC)在不同泪液类型间差异显著(F = 7.21; P < 0.001)。2B型泪液患者的平均nSSC(1.45±0.40)明显低于无泪液患者(1.68±0.37,P = 0.018)和2A型泪液患者(1.74±0.31,P = 0.023)。术后6个月,SSC肌腱撕裂患者的nSSC显著降低(nSSC = 1.48±0.34;ΔnSSC = -0.10±0.24;P < 0.001)。对于2A型及以上严重撕裂患者,术后清创组(Δ nSSC = -0.13±0.18;P = 0.004)和修复组(Δ nSSC = -0.12±0.29;P = 0.017) nSSC均显著降低。但两组间体积变化程度无显著差异。结论:即使在只影响第一关节突的部分厚度撕裂中,nSSC肌肉体积也随着撕裂严重程度的增加而显著减少。此外,SSC肌腱撕裂患者术后6个月SSC肌肉体积显著减少,尽管这种减少的程度在不同的治疗方式之间没有变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信