Factors Influencing Initial Trial Planning for Low Back Pain Among Veterans Health Administration Chiropractors: A Descriptive Observational Survey.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Victoria A Bensel, Paul E Dougherty, Brenda T Fenton, Anthony J Lisi
{"title":"Factors Influencing Initial Trial Planning for Low Back Pain Among Veterans Health Administration Chiropractors: A Descriptive Observational Survey.","authors":"Victoria A Bensel, Paul E Dougherty, Brenda T Fenton, Anthony J Lisi","doi":"10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess how chiropractors within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) determine their perceived-optimal dosage (number of visits and trial duration) when planning initial trials of care for patients with low back pain, and to describe factors perceived to influence these decisions, as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to all chiropractors with an active VHA appointment as of July 1, 2024 (N = 384). The survey, based on prior qualitative interviews and pilot testing, included a clinical vignette and questions related to perceived-optimal visit number and duration, modifying factors, and implementation. Descriptive and inferential statistics (Pearson's chi-squares) were used to analyze responses in SAS 9.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 181 VHA chiropractors completed the survey (47.1% response rate). The most frequently reported perceived-optimal initial trial was 6 visits over 6 weeks (21.5%). Respondents reported that increasing patient age, higher pain intensity, greater functional impairment, and shorter duration of symptoms would increase the planned visit dosage. There was considerable variation in chiropractors' perceptions of the ideal initial treatment trial. Most clinicians (62%) reported they were able to implement their preferred initial trial less than half of the time. The same barriers (including number of available chiropractic clinicians and treatment rooms) and facilitators (including the ability to collaborate with non-DC clinicians and the presence of clinical support staff) were reported by both the <25% and ≥75% optimal implementation groups. However, more chiropractors in the <25% optimal implementation group reported barriers than did those in the ≥75% optimal implementation group for the number of DC Clinicians (74% vs 39%, p = .0002), and clinical access parameters (67% vs 36%, p = .0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study revealed that VHA chiropractors reported variable perceived-optimal initial trial dosages and endorsed several clinical and system-level factors that influence trial planning. Reported barriers to implementation were common, particularly those related to staffing and space limitations, with more chiropractors in the low implementation group reporting barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2025.08.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess how chiropractors within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) determine their perceived-optimal dosage (number of visits and trial duration) when planning initial trials of care for patients with low back pain, and to describe factors perceived to influence these decisions, as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Methods: A cross-sectional electronic survey was distributed to all chiropractors with an active VHA appointment as of July 1, 2024 (N = 384). The survey, based on prior qualitative interviews and pilot testing, included a clinical vignette and questions related to perceived-optimal visit number and duration, modifying factors, and implementation. Descriptive and inferential statistics (Pearson's chi-squares) were used to analyze responses in SAS 9.4.

Results: A total of 181 VHA chiropractors completed the survey (47.1% response rate). The most frequently reported perceived-optimal initial trial was 6 visits over 6 weeks (21.5%). Respondents reported that increasing patient age, higher pain intensity, greater functional impairment, and shorter duration of symptoms would increase the planned visit dosage. There was considerable variation in chiropractors' perceptions of the ideal initial treatment trial. Most clinicians (62%) reported they were able to implement their preferred initial trial less than half of the time. The same barriers (including number of available chiropractic clinicians and treatment rooms) and facilitators (including the ability to collaborate with non-DC clinicians and the presence of clinical support staff) were reported by both the <25% and ≥75% optimal implementation groups. However, more chiropractors in the <25% optimal implementation group reported barriers than did those in the ≥75% optimal implementation group for the number of DC Clinicians (74% vs 39%, p = .0002), and clinical access parameters (67% vs 36%, p = .0002).

Conclusions: This study revealed that VHA chiropractors reported variable perceived-optimal initial trial dosages and endorsed several clinical and system-level factors that influence trial planning. Reported barriers to implementation were common, particularly those related to staffing and space limitations, with more chiropractors in the low implementation group reporting barriers.

影响退伍军人健康管理局脊医腰痛初始试验计划的因素:一项描述性观察性调查。
目的:本研究的目的是评估退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)的脊医在计划腰痛患者护理的初始试验时如何确定他们认为的最佳剂量(就诊次数和试验持续时间),并描述影响这些决定的因素,以及实施的障碍和促进因素。方法:对截至2024年7月1日所有在VHA任职的脊医进行横断面电子调查(N = 384)。该调查基于先前的定性访谈和试点测试,包括临床小插曲和与感知最佳就诊次数和持续时间、修改因素和实施相关的问题。采用描述性和推断性统计(Pearson’s卡方)分析SAS 9.4的反应。结果:共有181名VHA脊医完成调查,回应率为47.1%。最常报道的最佳初始试验是6周内6次就诊(21.5%)。应答者报告说,患者年龄的增加、疼痛强度的增加、功能损害的加重和症状持续时间的缩短将增加计划的就诊剂量。脊医对理想初始治疗试验的看法存在相当大的差异。大多数临床医生(62%)报告说,他们能够在不到一半的时间内实施他们首选的初始试验。两项研究都报告了相同的障碍(包括可用的脊椎指压临床医生和治疗室的数量)和促进因素(包括与非dc临床医生合作的能力和临床支持人员的存在):本研究揭示了VHA脊椎指压医生报告了可变的感知最佳初始试验剂量,并认可了影响试验计划的几个临床和系统层面的因素。报告的实施障碍很常见,特别是与人员配备和空间限制有关的障碍,在低实施组中更多的脊医报告了障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) is an international and interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of conservative health care principles and practices. The JMPT is the premier biomedical publication in the chiropractic profession and publishes peer reviewed, research articles and the Journal''s editorial board includes leading researchers from around the world. The Journal publishes original primary research and review articles of the highest quality in relevant topic areas. The JMPT addresses practitioners and researchers needs by adding to their clinical and basic science knowledge and by informing them about relevant issues that influence health care practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信