Comparison of upper and lower trapezius muscle strength in female office workers with and without chronic neck pain.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Alexandre Nunes, João Miguel, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Margarida Espanha
{"title":"Comparison of upper and lower trapezius muscle strength in female office workers with and without chronic neck pain.","authors":"Alexandre Nunes, João Miguel, Kristian Kjær-Staal Petersen, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Margarida Espanha","doi":"10.1177/10538127251380068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn chronic pain patients, pain sensitivity and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), a measure of muscle strength, are often impaired and related to the pain intensity. Therefore, this study aimed to assess MVC, pain sensitivity, and the potential association with pain intensity.MethodsA cross-sectional observational and analytic study with 133 female office workers was conducted, including both asymptomatic controls and those with chronic neck pain. The workers with chronic pain were categorized into pain conditions (chronic trapezius myalgia and chronic non-specific neck pain) and pain intensity groups, as mild pain (Visual analogue scale (VAS ≤ 3) and moderate pain (VAS > 3) groups. A handheld dynamometer was used to measure MVC at the upper trapezius (UT) and lower trapezius (LT). Pressure pain threshold (PPT) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) were assessed as measures of pain sensitivity.ResultsThe chronic trapezius myalgia group (n = 49) had a significantly decreased UT MVC [<i>F</i> (2128) = 4.099, <i>p</i> = 0.019] and LT MVC [<i>F</i> (2128) = 3.511, <i>p</i> = 0.033]. The moderate pain group (n = 43) had a significantly decreased UT MVC [<i>F</i> (2128) = 5.507, <i>p</i> = 0.005], and LT MVC [<i>F</i> (2128) = 4.119, <i>p</i> = .018]. Pain intensity, UT/LT ratio explained 19.4% of the variability in LT MVC, plus PPT explained 19.3% in UT MVC.ConclusionFemale office workers with CNP classified as moderate pain intensity and chronic trapezius myalgia had significantly decreased MVC in the UT and LT than the other groups. Pain intensity, decreased PPT in tibialis anterior, and the UT/LT ratio provide a limited explanation for muscle strength variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251380068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251380068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn chronic pain patients, pain sensitivity and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), a measure of muscle strength, are often impaired and related to the pain intensity. Therefore, this study aimed to assess MVC, pain sensitivity, and the potential association with pain intensity.MethodsA cross-sectional observational and analytic study with 133 female office workers was conducted, including both asymptomatic controls and those with chronic neck pain. The workers with chronic pain were categorized into pain conditions (chronic trapezius myalgia and chronic non-specific neck pain) and pain intensity groups, as mild pain (Visual analogue scale (VAS ≤ 3) and moderate pain (VAS > 3) groups. A handheld dynamometer was used to measure MVC at the upper trapezius (UT) and lower trapezius (LT). Pressure pain threshold (PPT) and temporal summation of pain (TSP) were assessed as measures of pain sensitivity.ResultsThe chronic trapezius myalgia group (n = 49) had a significantly decreased UT MVC [F (2128) = 4.099, p = 0.019] and LT MVC [F (2128) = 3.511, p = 0.033]. The moderate pain group (n = 43) had a significantly decreased UT MVC [F (2128) = 5.507, p = 0.005], and LT MVC [F (2128) = 4.119, p = .018]. Pain intensity, UT/LT ratio explained 19.4% of the variability in LT MVC, plus PPT explained 19.3% in UT MVC.ConclusionFemale office workers with CNP classified as moderate pain intensity and chronic trapezius myalgia had significantly decreased MVC in the UT and LT than the other groups. Pain intensity, decreased PPT in tibialis anterior, and the UT/LT ratio provide a limited explanation for muscle strength variability.

慢性颈痛与非慢性颈痛女性上班族上、下斜方肌肌力比较。
在慢性疼痛患者中,疼痛敏感性和最大自愿收缩(MVC),一种肌肉力量的测量,经常受损,并与疼痛强度有关。因此,本研究旨在评估MVC、疼痛敏感性以及与疼痛强度的潜在关联。方法对133名女性办公人员进行横断面观察和分析研究,其中包括无症状对照组和慢性颈部疼痛组。将患有慢性疼痛的工人分为疼痛状态组(慢性斜方肌痛和慢性非特异性颈部疼痛)和疼痛强度组,分为轻度疼痛组(视觉模拟评分(VAS≤3)和中度疼痛组(VAS > 3)。手持式测功仪测量上斜方肌(UT)和下斜方肌(LT)的MVC。以压痛阈值(PPT)和疼痛时间总和(TSP)作为疼痛敏感性的衡量指标。结果慢性斜方肌痛组(n = 49)的UT MVC [F (2128) = 4.099, p = 0.019]和LT MVC [F (2128) = 3.511, p = 0.033]明显降低。中度疼痛组(n = 43)的UT MVC [F (2128) = 5.507, p = 0.005]和LT MVC [F (2128) = 4.119, p = 0.018]显著降低。疼痛强度、UT/LT比值解释了LT MVC中19.4%的变异,加上PPT解释了UT MVC中19.3%的变异。结论中度疼痛和慢性斜方肌痛的女性办公室工作人员在UT和LT的MVC明显低于其他组。疼痛强度、胫骨前肌PPT下降和UT/LT比值为肌肉力量变异性提供了有限的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信