Privacy-by-Design Approach to Generate Two Virtual Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis and Release Them as Open Datasets: Evaluation Study.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stanislas Demuth, Olivia Rousseau, Igor Faddeenkov, Julien Paris, Jérôme De Sèze, Béatrice Baciotti, Marianne Payet, Morgan Guillaudeux, Alban-Félix Barreteau, David Laplaud, Gilles Edan, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud
{"title":"Privacy-by-Design Approach to Generate Two Virtual Clinical Trials for Multiple Sclerosis and Release Them as Open Datasets: Evaluation Study.","authors":"Stanislas Demuth, Olivia Rousseau, Igor Faddeenkov, Julien Paris, Jérôme De Sèze, Béatrice Baciotti, Marianne Payet, Morgan Guillaudeux, Alban-Félix Barreteau, David Laplaud, Gilles Edan, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud","doi":"10.2196/71297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sharing information derived from individual patient data is restricted by regulatory frameworks due to privacy concerns. Generative artificial intelligence can generate shareable virtual patient populations as proxies for sensitive reference datasets. Explicit demonstration of privacy is demanded.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated whether a privacy-by-design technique called \"avatars\" can generate synthetic datasets replicating all reported information from randomized clinical trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We generated 2160 synthetic datasets from two phase 3 RCTs for patients with multiple sclerosis (NCT00213135 and NCT00906399; n=865 and 1516 patients) with different configurations to select one synthetic dataset with optimal privacy and utility for each. Several privacy metrics were computed, including protection against distance-based membership inference attacks. We assessed fidelity by comparing variable distributions and assessed utility by checking that all end points reported in the publications had the same effect directions, were within the reported 95% CIs, and had the same statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protection against membership inference attacks was the hardest privacy metric to optimize, but the technique yielded robust privacy and replication of the primary end points (in 72.5% and 80.8% of the 1080 generated datasets). Utility was uneven across the variables and end points, such that information about some end points could not be captured. With optimized generation configurations, we selected one dataset from each RCT replicating all efficacy end points of the placebo and approved treatment arms while maintaining satisfactory privacy (hidden rate: 85.0% and 93.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generating synthetic RCT datasets replicating primary and secondary efficacy end points is possible while achieving a satisfactory and explicit level of privacy. To show the potential of this method to unlock health data sharing, we released both placebo arms as open datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e71297"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sharing information derived from individual patient data is restricted by regulatory frameworks due to privacy concerns. Generative artificial intelligence can generate shareable virtual patient populations as proxies for sensitive reference datasets. Explicit demonstration of privacy is demanded.

Objective: This study evaluated whether a privacy-by-design technique called "avatars" can generate synthetic datasets replicating all reported information from randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

Methods: We generated 2160 synthetic datasets from two phase 3 RCTs for patients with multiple sclerosis (NCT00213135 and NCT00906399; n=865 and 1516 patients) with different configurations to select one synthetic dataset with optimal privacy and utility for each. Several privacy metrics were computed, including protection against distance-based membership inference attacks. We assessed fidelity by comparing variable distributions and assessed utility by checking that all end points reported in the publications had the same effect directions, were within the reported 95% CIs, and had the same statistical significance.

Results: Protection against membership inference attacks was the hardest privacy metric to optimize, but the technique yielded robust privacy and replication of the primary end points (in 72.5% and 80.8% of the 1080 generated datasets). Utility was uneven across the variables and end points, such that information about some end points could not be captured. With optimized generation configurations, we selected one dataset from each RCT replicating all efficacy end points of the placebo and approved treatment arms while maintaining satisfactory privacy (hidden rate: 85.0% and 93.2%).

Conclusions: Generating synthetic RCT datasets replicating primary and secondary efficacy end points is possible while achieving a satisfactory and explicit level of privacy. To show the potential of this method to unlock health data sharing, we released both placebo arms as open datasets.

生成两个多发性硬化症虚拟临床试验并将其作为开放数据集发布的隐私设计方法:评估研究。
背景:由于隐私问题,来自患者个人数据的信息共享受到监管框架的限制。生成式人工智能可以生成可共享的虚拟患者群体作为敏感参考数据集的代理。明确地展示隐私是必要的。目的:本研究评估了一种名为“avatar”的隐私设计技术是否可以生成复制随机临床试验(rct)中所有报告信息的合成数据集。方法:我们从两个不同配置的多发性硬化症患者(NCT00213135和NCT00906399; n=865和1516例患者)的3期随机对照试验中生成2160个合成数据集,为每个合成数据集选择一个具有最佳隐私性和实用性的合成数据集。计算了几个隐私指标,包括防止基于距离的成员推理攻击。我们通过比较变量分布来评估保真度,并通过检查出版物中报告的所有终点是否具有相同的效应方向,是否在报告的95% ci范围内,是否具有相同的统计显著性来评估效用。结果:防止成员推理攻击是最难优化的隐私指标,但该技术产生了强大的隐私性和主要终点的复制(在1080个生成的数据集中的72.5%和80.8%)。变量和终点之间的效用是不均匀的,因此无法捕获有关某些终点的信息。通过优化的生成配置,我们从每个RCT中选择一个数据集,复制安慰剂和批准治疗组的所有疗效终点,同时保持令人满意的隐私(隐藏率:85.0%和93.2%)。结论:生成复制主要和次要疗效终点的合成RCT数据集是可能的,同时达到令人满意和明确的隐私水平。为了展示这种方法解锁健康数据共享的潜力,我们将安慰剂组作为开放数据集发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信