Non-contrast CT-based pulmonary embolism detection using GAN-generated synthetic contrast enhancement: Development and validation of an AI framework

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Young-Tak Kim , So Hyeon Bak , Seon-Sook Han , Yunsik Son , Jinkyeong Park
{"title":"Non-contrast CT-based pulmonary embolism detection using GAN-generated synthetic contrast enhancement: Development and validation of an AI framework","authors":"Young-Tak Kim ,&nbsp;So Hyeon Bak ,&nbsp;Seon-Sook Han ,&nbsp;Yunsik Son ,&nbsp;Jinkyeong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.111109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition often diagnosed using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). However, CTPA is contraindicated in patients with contrast allergies or at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy. This study explores an AI-driven approach to generate synthetic contrast-enhanced images from non-contrast CT scans for accurate diagnosis of acute PE without contrast agents. This retrospective study used dual-energy and standard CT datasets from two institutions. The internal dataset included 84 patients: 41 PE-negative cases for generative model training and 43 patients (30 PE-positive) for diagnostic evaluation. An external dataset of 62 patients (26 PE-positive) was used for further validation. We developed a generative adversarial network (GAN) based on U-Net, trained on paired non-contrast and contrast-enhanced images. The model was optimized using contrast-enhanced L1-loss with hyperparameter λ to improve anatomical accuracy. A ConvNeXt-based classifier trained on the RSNA dataset (N = 7,122) generated per-slice PE probabilities, which were aggregated for patient-level prediction via a Random Forest model. Diagnostic performance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation on both internal and external datasets. The GAN achieved optimal image similarity at λ = 0.5, with the lowest mean absolute error (0.0089) and highest MS-SSIM (0.9674). PE classification yielded AUCs of 0.861 and 0.836 in the internal dataset, and 0.787 and 0.680 in the external dataset, using real and synthetic images, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed. Our findings demonstrate that synthetic contrast CT can serve as a viable alternative for PE diagnosis in patients contraindicated for CTPA, supporting safe and accessible imaging strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 111109"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525014623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition often diagnosed using CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). However, CTPA is contraindicated in patients with contrast allergies or at risk for contrast-induced nephropathy. This study explores an AI-driven approach to generate synthetic contrast-enhanced images from non-contrast CT scans for accurate diagnosis of acute PE without contrast agents. This retrospective study used dual-energy and standard CT datasets from two institutions. The internal dataset included 84 patients: 41 PE-negative cases for generative model training and 43 patients (30 PE-positive) for diagnostic evaluation. An external dataset of 62 patients (26 PE-positive) was used for further validation. We developed a generative adversarial network (GAN) based on U-Net, trained on paired non-contrast and contrast-enhanced images. The model was optimized using contrast-enhanced L1-loss with hyperparameter λ to improve anatomical accuracy. A ConvNeXt-based classifier trained on the RSNA dataset (N = 7,122) generated per-slice PE probabilities, which were aggregated for patient-level prediction via a Random Forest model. Diagnostic performance was assessed using five-fold cross-validation on both internal and external datasets. The GAN achieved optimal image similarity at λ = 0.5, with the lowest mean absolute error (0.0089) and highest MS-SSIM (0.9674). PE classification yielded AUCs of 0.861 and 0.836 in the internal dataset, and 0.787 and 0.680 in the external dataset, using real and synthetic images, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed. Our findings demonstrate that synthetic contrast CT can serve as a viable alternative for PE diagnosis in patients contraindicated for CTPA, supporting safe and accessible imaging strategies.
基于非造影剂ct的肺栓塞检测使用gan生成的合成造影剂增强:AI框架的开发和验证。
急性肺栓塞(PE)是一种危及生命的疾病,通常使用CT肺血管造影(CTPA)诊断。然而,CTPA禁忌用于造影剂过敏或有造影剂肾病风险的患者。本研究探索了一种人工智能驱动的方法,从非对比CT扫描生成合成对比增强图像,以准确诊断急性PE,无需对比剂。这项回顾性研究使用了来自两个机构的双能量和标准CT数据集。内部数据集包括84例患者:41例pe阴性用于生成模型训练,43例(30例pe阳性)用于诊断评估。62例患者(26例pe阳性)的外部数据集用于进一步验证。我们开发了一个基于U-Net的生成对抗网络(GAN),对配对的非对比度和对比度增强图像进行训练。模型使用对比度增强l1损失和超参数λ进行优化,以提高解剖精度。在RSNA数据集(N = 7,122)上训练的基于convnext的分类器生成每片PE概率,并通过随机森林模型将其聚合以进行患者级预测。在内部和外部数据集上使用五倍交叉验证来评估诊断性能。在λ = 0.5时,GAN获得了最佳的图像相似度,平均绝对误差最小(0.0089),MS-SSIM最高(0.9674)。使用真实图像和合成图像,PE分类在内部数据集中的auc分别为0.861和0.836,在外部数据集中的auc分别为0.787和0.680。差异无统计学意义。我们的研究结果表明,合成对比CT可以作为CTPA禁忌患者PE诊断的可行替代方案,支持安全和可获得的成像策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信