Selecting effective antiseizure medications for early treatment of SCN8A-related epilepsy using a machine learning approach incorporating clinician and caregiver assessments.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1111/epi.18632
Joshua B Hack, Michael F Hammer
{"title":"Selecting effective antiseizure medications for early treatment of SCN8A-related epilepsy using a machine learning approach incorporating clinician and caregiver assessments.","authors":"Joshua B Hack, Michael F Hammer","doi":"10.1111/epi.18632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite rapid advances in understanding the disease spectrum and its progression, little is known about which antiseizure medications (ASMs) are likely to be beneficial or detrimental as first-line therapies for patients with SCN8A-related epilepsy (SCN8A-RE). This is a critical issue given low rates of seizure freedom and treatment resistance rates that exceed 75%. In this study, we test the hypothesis that machine learning (ML) algorithms can improve selection of ASMs that are likely to benefit patients with SCN8A-RE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leverage comprehensive medical data in the International SCN8A Patient Registry to construct a neural network that recommends ASMs based on a caregiver-centered composite measure incorporating improvements in seizure control, alertness, and side effects. We directly compare the recommendations of the algorithm to preferences of clinician experts through a follow-up survey and evaluate how ASM selection is influenced when informed by the ML algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite challenges resulting from the prevalent use of polypharmacy and frequent suboptimal treatment responses, the algorithm identified ASMs likely to be beneficial in 76% ± 3% of cases while never recommending a detrimental ASM in 1100 trials. Clinician experts independently recommended beneficial ASMs in 22% (16/72) of cases, a rate that increased to 46% (11/24) when choices were given based on algorithm recommendations.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The results indicate that ML algorithms can improve selection of ASMs that are likely to be beneficial in the early treatment of SCN8A-RE patients, with little risk of recommending ASMs with detrimental effects-a particular hazard for patient populations requiring long-term maintenance on polypharmacy. The results also expand the number of recommended ASMs from two sodium channel blockers (SCBs) identified in a recent consensus process to five SCBs and a γ-aminobutyric acidergic drug. The algorithm lays the groundwork for incorporating composite measures that include both seizure control and quality of life metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18632","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite rapid advances in understanding the disease spectrum and its progression, little is known about which antiseizure medications (ASMs) are likely to be beneficial or detrimental as first-line therapies for patients with SCN8A-related epilepsy (SCN8A-RE). This is a critical issue given low rates of seizure freedom and treatment resistance rates that exceed 75%. In this study, we test the hypothesis that machine learning (ML) algorithms can improve selection of ASMs that are likely to benefit patients with SCN8A-RE.

Methods: We leverage comprehensive medical data in the International SCN8A Patient Registry to construct a neural network that recommends ASMs based on a caregiver-centered composite measure incorporating improvements in seizure control, alertness, and side effects. We directly compare the recommendations of the algorithm to preferences of clinician experts through a follow-up survey and evaluate how ASM selection is influenced when informed by the ML algorithm.

Results: Despite challenges resulting from the prevalent use of polypharmacy and frequent suboptimal treatment responses, the algorithm identified ASMs likely to be beneficial in 76% ± 3% of cases while never recommending a detrimental ASM in 1100 trials. Clinician experts independently recommended beneficial ASMs in 22% (16/72) of cases, a rate that increased to 46% (11/24) when choices were given based on algorithm recommendations.

Significance: The results indicate that ML algorithms can improve selection of ASMs that are likely to be beneficial in the early treatment of SCN8A-RE patients, with little risk of recommending ASMs with detrimental effects-a particular hazard for patient populations requiring long-term maintenance on polypharmacy. The results also expand the number of recommended ASMs from two sodium channel blockers (SCBs) identified in a recent consensus process to five SCBs and a γ-aminobutyric acidergic drug. The algorithm lays the groundwork for incorporating composite measures that include both seizure control and quality of life metrics.

使用结合临床医生和护理人员评估的机器学习方法,为scn8a相关癫痫的早期治疗选择有效的抗癫痫药物。
目的:尽管对scn8a相关癫痫(SCN8A-RE)患者的疾病谱系及其进展的了解取得了快速进展,但对于哪些抗癫痫药物(asm)可能对scn8a相关癫痫(SCN8A-RE)患者的一线治疗有益或有害,我们知之甚少。鉴于癫痫发作自由率低和治疗抵抗率超过75%,这是一个关键问题。在这项研究中,我们验证了机器学习(ML)算法可以改善asm的选择,这些asm可能对SCN8A-RE患者有益。方法:我们利用国际SCN8A患者登记处的综合医疗数据来构建一个神经网络,该网络基于以护理人员为中心的综合措施,包括癫痫控制、警觉性和副作用的改善,来推荐asm。通过后续调查,我们直接比较了算法的建议与临床医生专家的偏好,并评估了ML算法对ASM选择的影响。结果:尽管普遍使用多种药物和频繁的次优治疗反应带来了挑战,但在1100项试验中,该算法识别出ASM可能在76%±3%的病例中是有益的,而从未推荐有害的ASM。临床专家在22%(16/72)的病例中独立推荐了有益的asm,当基于算法推荐给出选择时,这一比例增加到46%(11/24)。意义:结果表明,ML算法可以改进asm的选择,这些asm可能对SCN8A-RE患者的早期治疗有益,而推荐具有有害影响的asm的风险很小,这对于需要长期维持多种药物治疗的患者群体来说是一种特别的危险。该结果还将asm的推荐数量从最近共识过程中确定的两种钠通道阻滞剂(SCBs)扩大到五种SCBs和一种γ-氨基丁酸能药物。该算法为合并包括癫痫控制和生活质量指标在内的复合措施奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信