Is Lobectomy Associated With Improved Outcomes Compared to Segmentectomy in Small Cell Lung Cancer Discovered at the Time of Resection?

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sneha S Alaparthi, Anurag Ishwar, Gregory Whitehorn, Isheeta Madeka, Tyler Grenda, John D Jacob, Nathaniel R Evans Iii, Olugbenga T Okusanya
{"title":"Is Lobectomy Associated With Improved Outcomes Compared to Segmentectomy in Small Cell Lung Cancer Discovered at the Time of Resection?","authors":"Sneha S Alaparthi, Anurag Ishwar, Gregory Whitehorn, Isheeta Madeka, Tyler Grenda, John D Jacob, Nathaniel R Evans Iii, Olugbenga T Okusanya","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 10%-15% of all lung cancer cases in the United States. The extent of surgery for early-stage SCLC remains controversial,with the treatment standard being chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We aim to evaluate outcomes among the patients who underwent a lobectomy or segmentectomy in SCLC diagnosed on the day of resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized the NCDB. We examined patients >18 who underwent a lobectomy or segmentectomy between 2010 and 2019 who had clinically node negative SCLC diagnosed at the time of resection. Outcome variables include 5- year, 30-day, 90-day mortality and readmission rates. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare outcomes between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>564 patients were examined, with a mean age of 68. Males comprised of 42.9% of the cohort. 65 (12%) patients underwent segmentectomy and 499 (88%) patients underwent lobectomy. There were no differences in nodal upstaging (P = .31) and T stage upstaging (P = .37) between the 2 cohorts. 90.2% of the population was clinical stage I (P = .003). There were no significant differences in 5- year, 30-day, 90-day mortality (P = .22, P = .40, P = .77), and readmission (P = .57) in this cohort. After PSM (n = 118) there continued to be no significant difference in all outcomes between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we found that rates of T and N upstaging, 5-year mortality, and short-term outcomes did not differ amongst cohorts, showing that patients who undergo segmentectomy may not benefit from undergoing a more extensive resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents approximately 10%-15% of all lung cancer cases in the United States. The extent of surgery for early-stage SCLC remains controversial,with the treatment standard being chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We aim to evaluate outcomes among the patients who underwent a lobectomy or segmentectomy in SCLC diagnosed on the day of resection.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the NCDB. We examined patients >18 who underwent a lobectomy or segmentectomy between 2010 and 2019 who had clinically node negative SCLC diagnosed at the time of resection. Outcome variables include 5- year, 30-day, 90-day mortality and readmission rates. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare outcomes between groups.

Results: 564 patients were examined, with a mean age of 68. Males comprised of 42.9% of the cohort. 65 (12%) patients underwent segmentectomy and 499 (88%) patients underwent lobectomy. There were no differences in nodal upstaging (P = .31) and T stage upstaging (P = .37) between the 2 cohorts. 90.2% of the population was clinical stage I (P = .003). There were no significant differences in 5- year, 30-day, 90-day mortality (P = .22, P = .40, P = .77), and readmission (P = .57) in this cohort. After PSM (n = 118) there continued to be no significant difference in all outcomes between cohorts.

Conclusions: In this study, we found that rates of T and N upstaging, 5-year mortality, and short-term outcomes did not differ amongst cohorts, showing that patients who undergo segmentectomy may not benefit from undergoing a more extensive resection.

在切除时发现的小细胞肺癌,肺叶切除术与节段切除术相比,预后更好吗?
背景:在美国,小细胞肺癌(SCLC)约占所有肺癌病例的10%-15%。手术治疗早期SCLC的范围仍有争议,治疗标准是化疗还是放化疗。我们的目的是评估在切除当天诊断为SCLC的患者接受肺叶切除术或节段切除术的结果。方法:采用NCDB进行回顾性队列研究。我们检查了2010年至2019年期间接受肺叶切除术或节段切除术的bbb18患者,这些患者在切除术时诊断为临床淋巴结阴性SCLC。结果变量包括5年、30天、90天死亡率和再入院率。倾向评分匹配用于组间结果的比较。结果:共检查564例患者,平均年龄68岁。男性占队列的42.9%。65例(12%)患者行节段切除术,499例(88%)患者行肺叶切除术。两组患者在淋巴结占优(P = 0.31)和T期占优(P = 0.37)方面均无差异。90.2%的患者为临床I期(P = 0.003)。在该队列中,5年、30天、90天死亡率(P = 0.22、P = 0.40、P = 0.77)和再入院率(P = 0.57)无显著差异。PSM后(n = 118),各组间的所有结果仍无显著差异。结论:在这项研究中,我们发现T和N占优率、5年死亡率和短期预后在队列中没有差异,这表明接受节段切除术的患者可能不会从更广泛的切除术中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信