Establishing indicators to monitor the utilization of POC glucose meters in glycemic control

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Yun Huang , Brendan Ly
{"title":"Establishing indicators to monitor the utilization of POC glucose meters in glycemic control","authors":"Yun Huang ,&nbsp;Brendan Ly","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.111021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The use of point-of-care (POC) glucose meters and effectiveness of glycemic control should be monitored as part of quality assurance practices. This study is the first to establish indicators to evaluate the utilization of glucose meters in our academic hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patient results from glucose meters located in emergency department (ED), intensive care units (ICUs), general wards, and neonatal units were extracted from the data management system for the months of October to December from 2021 to 2023. Six indicators were developed and compared across clinical units, including: glucose test number per meter, daily frequency of patient glucose testing 1–4 times (%), ratio of POC to core lab glucose testing, and percentages of patient glucose results within target ranges, below critical level 2.5 mmol/L, or above 25.0 mmol/L.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The six indicators varied greatly between clinical units due to the differences in patient populations, clinical scenarios, and clinical guidelines. About 90 % of patients in general wards, ED and neonatal units were tested glucose 1–4 times/day, while 27.1 % patients in ICUs were tested glucose 5–10 times/day or more. The average POC/core lab glucose testing ratio in neonatal units, general wards, ICUs, and ED was 17.6, 14.9, 2.2, and 0.3, respectively. Overall, 69.6 % of patient glucose results in all clinical units fell within the target ranges. Percentages of patient glucose results below 2.5 mmol/L or above 25.0 mmol/L were both under 0.6 % across clinical units.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this study, the indicators were able to assess the use of POC glucose meters and the effectiveness of glycemic control and to identify opportunities for quality improvement. The approach can be readily applied in other hospitals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 111021"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000991202500150X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The use of point-of-care (POC) glucose meters and effectiveness of glycemic control should be monitored as part of quality assurance practices. This study is the first to establish indicators to evaluate the utilization of glucose meters in our academic hospital.

Methods

Patient results from glucose meters located in emergency department (ED), intensive care units (ICUs), general wards, and neonatal units were extracted from the data management system for the months of October to December from 2021 to 2023. Six indicators were developed and compared across clinical units, including: glucose test number per meter, daily frequency of patient glucose testing 1–4 times (%), ratio of POC to core lab glucose testing, and percentages of patient glucose results within target ranges, below critical level 2.5 mmol/L, or above 25.0 mmol/L.

Results

The six indicators varied greatly between clinical units due to the differences in patient populations, clinical scenarios, and clinical guidelines. About 90 % of patients in general wards, ED and neonatal units were tested glucose 1–4 times/day, while 27.1 % patients in ICUs were tested glucose 5–10 times/day or more. The average POC/core lab glucose testing ratio in neonatal units, general wards, ICUs, and ED was 17.6, 14.9, 2.2, and 0.3, respectively. Overall, 69.6 % of patient glucose results in all clinical units fell within the target ranges. Percentages of patient glucose results below 2.5 mmol/L or above 25.0 mmol/L were both under 0.6 % across clinical units.

Conclusions

In this study, the indicators were able to assess the use of POC glucose meters and the effectiveness of glycemic control and to identify opportunities for quality improvement. The approach can be readily applied in other hospitals.
建立指标监测POC血糖仪在血糖控制中的使用情况。
目的:作为质量保证实践的一部分,应监测即时血糖仪的使用和血糖控制的有效性。本研究首次建立了评价我院血糖仪使用情况的指标体系。方法:从数据管理系统中提取2021 - 2023年10 - 12月急诊科(ED)、重症监护病房(icu)、普通病房和新生儿病房的血糖仪患者结果。制定了六个指标并在临床单位之间进行比较,包括:每米葡萄糖检测次数、患者每日葡萄糖检测1-4次的频率(%)、POC与核心实验室葡萄糖检测的比率,以及患者葡萄糖结果在目标范围内、低于临界水平2.5 mmol/L或高于25.0 mmol/L的百分比。结果:由于患者群体、临床情况和临床指南的差异,六个指标在临床单位之间差异很大。普通病房、急诊科和新生儿病房中约90% %的患者检测葡萄糖1-4次/天,而icu中27.1% %的患者检测葡萄糖5-10次/天或更多。新生儿病房、普通病房、icu和ED的平均POC/核心实验室血糖检测比率分别为17.6、14.9、2.2和0.3。总体而言,69.6 %的患者血糖结果在所有临床单位的目标范围内。在临床单位中,患者血糖结果低于2.5 mmol/L或高于25.0 mmol/L的百分比均低于0.6 %。结论:在本研究中,这些指标能够评估POC血糖仪的使用和血糖控制的有效性,并识别质量改进的机会。这种方法可以很容易地应用于其他医院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信