Comparison of outcomes between total intravenous (propofol and remifentanil) and inhalation (isoflurane) anesthesia in women undergoing abdominal myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"Comparison of outcomes between total intravenous (propofol and remifentanil) and inhalation (isoflurane) anesthesia in women undergoing abdominal myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Khadijeh Pouya, Razih Vejdani, Mehdi Taheri, Pouya Hatami Marandi, Fatemeh Aliyar, Parvin Hakimi, Hosein Azizi","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03337-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The study aimed to compare anesthesia maintenance using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia (IA) and investigating their effects on bleeding volume, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications in women patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy at a large non-university hospital in northwest Iran in 2023. A total of 60 eligible patients were randomly assigned to two groups of TIVA (n = 30) and IA (n = 30) anesthesia methods. The study groups' allocation was blinded to the anesthesiology provider and she was responsible for anesthesia and patient monitoring. The study outcomes were hemodynamic changes, bleeding during the surgery, anesthesia time, hospitalization, and postoperative complications between the study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in surgical indications, myoma size, hemoglobin levels, or clinical and obstetric characteristics before surgery between the two study groups (p > 0.05). The average blood loss (201.8 vs. 391.0 ml; P = 0.001), postoperative hemoglobin levels (11.6 vs. 10.5; P = 0.005), anesthesia times (100.6 vs. 114.3 min; P = 0.003), and hospitalization days (2.06 vs. 2.36; P = 0.005) showed statistically significant differences between the TIVA and IA groups, respectively. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate values were significantly higher in the IA group compared to the TIVA group (P < 0.05). No muscle stiffness, dizziness, or respiratory depression were observed after surgery in either study group. The proportion of shivering in the TIVA and IA groups was 16.7% and 43.3%, respectively, indicating a significant statistical difference (P = 0.024). The proportion of optimal surgeon performance was reported to be higher in the TIVA group compared to the IA group (P = 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the findings of this study, the use of the TIVA method compared to IA during the maintenance of general anesthesia was linked to a reduction in intraoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements, as well as increased optimal surgeon performance in patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy. Furthermore, patients in the TIVA group experienced fewer complications during and after surgery, along with a shorter hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study protocol was retrospectively registered and confirmed in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials under the number (IRCT20220930056059N1). Registration date: 2022-11-13. Expected recruitment start date: 2022-11-11.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03337-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The study aimed to compare anesthesia maintenance using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalation anesthesia (IA) and investigating their effects on bleeding volume, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and postoperative complications in women patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy.
Methods: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy at a large non-university hospital in northwest Iran in 2023. A total of 60 eligible patients were randomly assigned to two groups of TIVA (n = 30) and IA (n = 30) anesthesia methods. The study groups' allocation was blinded to the anesthesiology provider and she was responsible for anesthesia and patient monitoring. The study outcomes were hemodynamic changes, bleeding during the surgery, anesthesia time, hospitalization, and postoperative complications between the study groups.
Results: There were no significant differences in surgical indications, myoma size, hemoglobin levels, or clinical and obstetric characteristics before surgery between the two study groups (p > 0.05). The average blood loss (201.8 vs. 391.0 ml; P = 0.001), postoperative hemoglobin levels (11.6 vs. 10.5; P = 0.005), anesthesia times (100.6 vs. 114.3 min; P = 0.003), and hospitalization days (2.06 vs. 2.36; P = 0.005) showed statistically significant differences between the TIVA and IA groups, respectively. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate values were significantly higher in the IA group compared to the TIVA group (P < 0.05). No muscle stiffness, dizziness, or respiratory depression were observed after surgery in either study group. The proportion of shivering in the TIVA and IA groups was 16.7% and 43.3%, respectively, indicating a significant statistical difference (P = 0.024). The proportion of optimal surgeon performance was reported to be higher in the TIVA group compared to the IA group (P = 0.014).
Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, the use of the TIVA method compared to IA during the maintenance of general anesthesia was linked to a reduction in intraoperative bleeding and transfusion requirements, as well as increased optimal surgeon performance in patients undergoing abdominal myomectomy. Furthermore, patients in the TIVA group experienced fewer complications during and after surgery, along with a shorter hospital stay.
Trial registration: The study protocol was retrospectively registered and confirmed in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials under the number (IRCT20220930056059N1). Registration date: 2022-11-13. Expected recruitment start date: 2022-11-11.
前言:本研究旨在比较全静脉麻醉(TIVA)和吸入麻醉(IA)对女性腹肌瘤切除术患者的麻醉维持,并探讨其对出血量、术中血流动力学变化和术后并发症的影响。方法:对2023年在伊朗西北部某大型非大学医院行腹部肌瘤切除术的患者进行双盲随机对照试验。将60例符合条件的患者随机分为TIVA麻醉组(n = 30)和IA麻醉组(n = 30)。研究组的分配对麻醉学提供者不透明,她负责麻醉和患者监测。研究结果包括血流动力学变化、术中出血、麻醉时间、住院和研究组之间的术后并发症。结果:两组患者在手术指征、肌瘤大小、血红蛋白水平、术前临床及产科特征方面均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。平均失血量(201.8 vs. 391.0 ml, P = 0.001)、术后血红蛋白水平(11.6 vs. 10.5, P = 0.005)、麻醉时间(100.6 vs. 114.3 min, P = 0.003)、住院天数(2.06 vs. 2.36, P = 0.005)在TIVA组与IA组之间差异均有统计学意义。与TIVA组相比,IA组的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率值明显更高(P结论:根据本研究的发现,与IA相比,在维持全身麻醉期间使用TIVA方法与术中出血和输血需求减少有关,并提高了腹肌瘤切除术患者的最佳外科医生表现。此外,TIVA组患者在手术期间和术后并发症较少,住院时间也较短。试验注册:研究方案在伊朗临床试验登记处回顾性注册并确认,编号为IRCT20220930056059N1。报名日期:2022-11-13。预计招聘开始日期:2022-11-11。
期刊介绍:
BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.