Identification of the implementation influencing factors of the organized breast cancer screening in Ordos city: from caregivers' perspectives.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ziting Cai, Hanyue Ding, Sumeng Wang, Huijiao Yan, Na Cao, Yongdong Zhang, Youlin Qiao, Chen Wang
{"title":"Identification of the implementation influencing factors of the organized breast cancer screening in Ordos city: from caregivers' perspectives.","authors":"Ziting Cai, Hanyue Ding, Sumeng Wang, Huijiao Yan, Na Cao, Yongdong Zhang, Youlin Qiao, Chen Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13289-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An organized breast cancer screening program has been introduced by the local government in Ordos City since 2010. Women between 35 and 64 years are eligible to be screened freely at local maternal and child healthcare hospitals. The screening coverage rate in Ordos City is relatively higher than the national average level. However, the overall breast cancer detection rate remains low. This study aims to identify contextual influencing factors of this program from local maternal and child healthcare hospitals' perspectives and provide suggestions for screening service improvement in Ordos City.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study to evaluate the implementation of the organized breast cancer screening program from maternal and child healthcare hospitals' perspectives in Ordos City. Four domains (outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process) and nine constructs were selected for evaluation under the instruction of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). CIFR constructs were rated in both valence and strength factors. The interview scripts were coded and themes were generated by using content analysis. Data obtained were interpreted and described by tables and charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 individuals participated in our study. We found that the implementation of the organized breast cancer screening in Ordos City went well. Policies & laws, partnerships & connections, performance-measurement pressure, implementation leads, teaming, and engaging constructs holistically facilitated the implementation performance. Available resources varied and this construct chiefly displayed a neutral impact. Access to knowledge & information and doing constructs were considered to negatively influence the implementation performance. Political commitment to cervical cancer elimination, multisectoral collaboration, specialized leadership, and structured screening teams were the main factors promoting the screening progress. Inconsistent referrals, underqualified professional competence of primary health workers, and non-interoperable electronic systems were the main barriers to screening performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recommend that Ordos City further facilitates the prompt referral for imaging and biopsy, promotes the capacity building of primary health workers, and strengthens the construction of electronic systems. Future quantitative studies are necessary to comprehend the knowledge and attitudes of caregivers and target population toward breast cancer screening. Interviews with other stakeholders, such as policymakers and target population, are also needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1260"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13289-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An organized breast cancer screening program has been introduced by the local government in Ordos City since 2010. Women between 35 and 64 years are eligible to be screened freely at local maternal and child healthcare hospitals. The screening coverage rate in Ordos City is relatively higher than the national average level. However, the overall breast cancer detection rate remains low. This study aims to identify contextual influencing factors of this program from local maternal and child healthcare hospitals' perspectives and provide suggestions for screening service improvement in Ordos City.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to evaluate the implementation of the organized breast cancer screening program from maternal and child healthcare hospitals' perspectives in Ordos City. Four domains (outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and process) and nine constructs were selected for evaluation under the instruction of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). CIFR constructs were rated in both valence and strength factors. The interview scripts were coded and themes were generated by using content analysis. Data obtained were interpreted and described by tables and charts.

Results: A total of 28 individuals participated in our study. We found that the implementation of the organized breast cancer screening in Ordos City went well. Policies & laws, partnerships & connections, performance-measurement pressure, implementation leads, teaming, and engaging constructs holistically facilitated the implementation performance. Available resources varied and this construct chiefly displayed a neutral impact. Access to knowledge & information and doing constructs were considered to negatively influence the implementation performance. Political commitment to cervical cancer elimination, multisectoral collaboration, specialized leadership, and structured screening teams were the main factors promoting the screening progress. Inconsistent referrals, underqualified professional competence of primary health workers, and non-interoperable electronic systems were the main barriers to screening performance.

Conclusions: We recommend that Ordos City further facilitates the prompt referral for imaging and biopsy, promotes the capacity building of primary health workers, and strengthens the construction of electronic systems. Future quantitative studies are necessary to comprehend the knowledge and attitudes of caregivers and target population toward breast cancer screening. Interviews with other stakeholders, such as policymakers and target population, are also needed.

鄂尔多斯市有组织乳腺癌筛查实施影响因素探析——基于护理者视角
背景:自2010年起,鄂尔多斯市政府开展了一项有组织的乳腺癌筛查项目。35岁至64岁的妇女有资格在当地妇幼保健医院免费接受检查。鄂尔多斯市的筛查覆盖率相对高于全国平均水平。然而,总体的乳腺癌检出率仍然很低。本研究旨在从鄂尔多斯市地方妇幼保健院的角度,找出影响该项目的语境因素,并为我市妇幼保健院筛查服务的改善提供建议。方法:采用定性研究方法,从鄂尔多斯市妇幼保健院的角度评价组织乳腺癌筛查项目的实施情况。在实施研究统一框架(CFIR)的指导下,选择了四个领域(外部环境、内部环境、个体和过程)和九个构念进行评价。CIFR结构在效价和强度因子上都进行了评分。对访谈脚本进行编码,利用内容分析生成主题。获得的数据用表格和图表进行解释和描述。结果:共有28人参与了我们的研究。我们发现,我市有组织的乳腺癌筛查实施情况良好。政策和法律、伙伴关系和联系、绩效衡量压力、实施领导、团队合作和参与结构整体上促进了实施绩效。可利用的资源各不相同,这一构造主要表现为中性影响。知识和信息的获取和行为结构被认为对实施绩效有负面影响。消除子宫颈癌的政治承诺、多部门合作、专业化领导和结构化筛查小组是促进筛查进展的主要因素。不一致的转诊、初级卫生工作者专业能力不足以及不可互操作的电子系统是筛查绩效的主要障碍。结论:我们建议鄂尔多斯市进一步促进影像学和活检的及时转诊,促进初级卫生工作者的能力建设,加强电子系统建设。未来有必要进行定量研究,以了解护理人员和目标人群对乳腺癌筛查的知识和态度。还需要与其他利益攸关方面谈,例如政策制定者和目标人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信