Patient reported respiratory symptoms and lung radiation doses 11 years after loco-regional breast cancer radiation therapy in the DBCG RT Nation Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Maja Bendtsen Sharma, Lasse Hindhede Refsgaard, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Emma Skarsø Buhl, Robert Zachariae, Rasmus Blechingberg Friis, Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, Stine Sofia Korreman, Birgitte Vrou Offersen
{"title":"Patient reported respiratory symptoms and lung radiation doses 11 years after loco-regional breast cancer radiation therapy in the DBCG RT Nation Study.","authors":"Maja Bendtsen Sharma, Lasse Hindhede Refsgaard, Elisabeth Bendstrup, Emma Skarsø Buhl, Robert Zachariae, Rasmus Blechingberg Friis, Ingeborg Farver-Vestergaard, Stine Sofia Korreman, Birgitte Vrou Offersen","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The Danish Patient Association of Late Effects has received numerous inquiries from breast cancer (BC) survivors suspecting that adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was the reason for respiratory symptoms. This study investigated patient-reported respiratory symptoms after locoregional RT and their association with ipsilateral lung radiation dose. Patient/material and methods: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and RT plans from BC patients treated at a single institution over 2008-2016 were collected. PROs included dyspnoea (EORTC QLQ-C30), cough (PRO-CTCAE), smoking and comorbidities. RT dose-volume metrics were registered including ipsilateral mean lung dose (MLD), and volumes receiving 5 Gy (V5) and 20 Gy (V20). Patients were stratified into MLD tertiles ('low', 'intermediate', 'high') and compared. Additionally, responders were dichotomised by dyspnoea and cough scores ('low' vs 'high'), and dose metrics were compared between symptom groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,011 questionnaire distributed, 490 (49%) were completed and analysed. Median age was 65.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58.8;73.4), median time from RT to questionnaire was 11.1 years (IQR 8.9;13.2). Overall MLD was 12.9Gy (standard deviation [SD] 2.8). Any degree of dyspnoea was reported by 203 (41%) and any degree cough was reported by 175 (37%). No differences in dyspnoea/cough scores between MLD groups were found. MLD was 13.0Gy (SD 2.7) in the low dyspnoea group and 12.0Gy (SD 3.0) in the high dyspnoea group, (p = 0.04). MLD was 13.0 Gy (SD 2.7) in the low cough group and 12.5Gy (SD 3.1) in the high cough group (p = 0.23). The same pattern was found for V5lung and V20lung.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>No associations between lung dose and patient-reported respiratory symptoms were found for node-positive BC patients 11 years after RT.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"1342-1350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Danish Patient Association of Late Effects has received numerous inquiries from breast cancer (BC) survivors suspecting that adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was the reason for respiratory symptoms. This study investigated patient-reported respiratory symptoms after locoregional RT and their association with ipsilateral lung radiation dose. Patient/material and methods: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and RT plans from BC patients treated at a single institution over 2008-2016 were collected. PROs included dyspnoea (EORTC QLQ-C30), cough (PRO-CTCAE), smoking and comorbidities. RT dose-volume metrics were registered including ipsilateral mean lung dose (MLD), and volumes receiving 5 Gy (V5) and 20 Gy (V20). Patients were stratified into MLD tertiles ('low', 'intermediate', 'high') and compared. Additionally, responders were dichotomised by dyspnoea and cough scores ('low' vs 'high'), and dose metrics were compared between symptom groups.

Results: Of 1,011 questionnaire distributed, 490 (49%) were completed and analysed. Median age was 65.8 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58.8;73.4), median time from RT to questionnaire was 11.1 years (IQR 8.9;13.2). Overall MLD was 12.9Gy (standard deviation [SD] 2.8). Any degree of dyspnoea was reported by 203 (41%) and any degree cough was reported by 175 (37%). No differences in dyspnoea/cough scores between MLD groups were found. MLD was 13.0Gy (SD 2.7) in the low dyspnoea group and 12.0Gy (SD 3.0) in the high dyspnoea group, (p = 0.04). MLD was 13.0 Gy (SD 2.7) in the low cough group and 12.5Gy (SD 3.1) in the high cough group (p = 0.23). The same pattern was found for V5lung and V20lung.

Interpretation: No associations between lung dose and patient-reported respiratory symptoms were found for node-positive BC patients 11 years after RT.

在DBCG RT国家研究中,患者在局部区域乳腺癌放射治疗11年后报告了呼吸道症状和肺辐射剂量。
背景和目的:丹麦晚期效应患者协会收到了许多来自乳腺癌(BC)幸存者的询问,他们怀疑辅助放疗(RT)是呼吸道症状的原因。本研究调查了局部放射治疗后患者报告的呼吸道症状及其与同侧肺辐射剂量的关系。患者/材料和方法:收集2008-2016年在单一机构治疗的BC患者报告的结果(PROs)和RT计划。PROs包括呼吸困难(EORTC QLQ-C30)、咳嗽(PRO-CTCAE)、吸烟和合并症。记录RT剂量-体积指标,包括同侧平均肺剂量(MLD),以及接受5 Gy (V5)和20 Gy (V20)的体积。将患者分为MLD等级(“低”、“中”、“高”)并进行比较。此外,根据呼吸困难和咳嗽评分(“低”和“高”)对应答者进行二分,并在症状组之间比较剂量指标。结果:共发放问卷1011份,完成分析490份(49%)。中位年龄为65.8岁(四分位数差[IQR] 58.8;73.4),从RT到问卷的中位时间为11.1岁(IQR为8.9;13.2)。总体MLD为12.9Gy(标准差[SD] 2.8)。203例(41%)报告有任何程度的呼吸困难,175例(37%)报告有任何程度的咳嗽。MLD组间呼吸困难/咳嗽评分无差异。低呼吸困难组MLD为13.0Gy (SD 2.7),高呼吸困难组MLD为12.0Gy (SD 3.0),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。低咳组MLD为13.0 Gy (SD 2.7),高咳组为12.5Gy (SD 3.1),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.23)。V5lung和V20lung也发现了相同的模式。解释:在放疗后11年淋巴结阳性的BC患者中,肺剂量与患者报告的呼吸道症状之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信