Patients' sense of gain experience and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study in Foshan, China.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ping Xia, Baofang Liang, Qi Zeng, Liang Wang, Lixiang Zhai, Meiying Li, Lieshen Chen, Haofan Yang, Haiyan He, Xingying Xu, Wenjin Gong
{"title":"Patients' sense of gain experience and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study in Foshan, China.","authors":"Ping Xia, Baofang Liang, Qi Zeng, Liang Wang, Lixiang Zhai, Meiying Li, Lieshen Chen, Haofan Yang, Haiyan He, Xingying Xu, Wenjin Gong","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients' sense of gain experience (PSGE) is the comprehensive feeling throughout the treatment process, which is a critical benchmark for evaluating comprehensive medical and health system reform in China. This study aims to assess the current status of PSGE in public hospitals and identify important associated factors, providing evidence-based recommendations for improving healthcare services.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted from October to November 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A total of 14 public hospitals in Foshan, Guangdong Province, China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>There were 3223 responses, including 1592 from outpatients and 1631 from inpatients.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measure: </strong>PSGE was assessed across five domains: time accessibility, service accessibility, cost affordability, patient participation and efficacy predictability. Participants were also asked to provide an overall rating of the PSGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall score for PSGE was 4.47±0.53 (mean±SD), with service accessibility receiving the highest score (4.68±0.50) and affordability the lowest (4.17±0.86). Secondary hospitals scored an overall PSGE of 4.55±0.50, while tertiary hospitals scored 4.42±0.54. Key factors associated with PSGE were overall satisfaction (β=0.164, p<0.001), treatment satisfaction (β=0.187, p<0.001), satisfaction with medical reforms (β=0.149, p<0.001), patient loyalty (β=0.072, p=0.001) and hospital reputation (β=0.223, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that patients reported a positive PSGE with service accessibility but reported a less positive PSGE with cost affordability. A tier-based disparity was evident, with secondary hospitals outperforming tertiary hospitals in overall PSGE outcome. Stronger PSGE was positively associated with higher scores in overall satisfaction, treatment satisfaction, satisfaction with medical reforms, patient loyalty and hospital reputation. Demographic and institutional factors, such as hospital level, patient type and household registration, were associated with the PSGE. Efforts can be focused on enhancing clinicians' willingness and competence in discussing treatment costs during clinical encounters. It is essential for policymakers to address disparities in healthcare experiences among patient groups across hospital tiers to advance equitable, patient-centred systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 9","pages":"e097707"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients' sense of gain experience (PSGE) is the comprehensive feeling throughout the treatment process, which is a critical benchmark for evaluating comprehensive medical and health system reform in China. This study aims to assess the current status of PSGE in public hospitals and identify important associated factors, providing evidence-based recommendations for improving healthcare services.

Design: This was a cross-sectional study conducted from October to November 2023.

Setting: A total of 14 public hospitals in Foshan, Guangdong Province, China.

Participants: There were 3223 responses, including 1592 from outpatients and 1631 from inpatients.

Primary outcome measure: PSGE was assessed across five domains: time accessibility, service accessibility, cost affordability, patient participation and efficacy predictability. Participants were also asked to provide an overall rating of the PSGE.

Results: The overall score for PSGE was 4.47±0.53 (mean±SD), with service accessibility receiving the highest score (4.68±0.50) and affordability the lowest (4.17±0.86). Secondary hospitals scored an overall PSGE of 4.55±0.50, while tertiary hospitals scored 4.42±0.54. Key factors associated with PSGE were overall satisfaction (β=0.164, p<0.001), treatment satisfaction (β=0.187, p<0.001), satisfaction with medical reforms (β=0.149, p<0.001), patient loyalty (β=0.072, p=0.001) and hospital reputation (β=0.223, p<0.001).

Conclusions: This study found that patients reported a positive PSGE with service accessibility but reported a less positive PSGE with cost affordability. A tier-based disparity was evident, with secondary hospitals outperforming tertiary hospitals in overall PSGE outcome. Stronger PSGE was positively associated with higher scores in overall satisfaction, treatment satisfaction, satisfaction with medical reforms, patient loyalty and hospital reputation. Demographic and institutional factors, such as hospital level, patient type and household registration, were associated with the PSGE. Efforts can be focused on enhancing clinicians' willingness and competence in discussing treatment costs during clinical encounters. It is essential for policymakers to address disparities in healthcare experiences among patient groups across hospital tiers to advance equitable, patient-centred systems.

佛山市患者获得体验感及其影响因素的横断面研究
目的:患者获得体验感(PSGE)是患者在整个治疗过程中的综合感受,是评价中国综合医疗卫生体制改革的重要指标。本研究旨在评估公立医院PSGE的现状,找出重要的相关因素,为改善医疗服务提供循证建议。设计:这是一项横断面研究,于2023年10月至11月进行。环境:中国广东省佛山市共有14家公立医院。参与者:共有3223份回复,其中门诊患者1592份,住院患者1631份。主要结局指标:PSGE在五个领域进行评估:时间可及性、服务可及性、成本可承受性、患者参与和疗效可预测性。参与者还被要求提供PSGE的总体评级。结果:综合得分为4.47±0.53 (mean±SD),服务可及性得分最高(4.68±0.50),可负担性得分最低(4.17±0.86)。二级医院总体PSGE为4.55±0.50,三级医院总体PSGE为4.42±0.54。与PSGE相关的关键因素是总体满意度(β=0.164, p)。结论:本研究发现,患者在服务可及性方面的PSGE为阳性,而在成本可负担性方面的PSGE为阴性。基于层级的差异是明显的,二级医院在总体PSGE结果上优于三级医院。PSGE越强,总体满意度、治疗满意度、医疗改革满意度、患者忠诚度和医院声誉得分越高。人口和体制因素,如医院级别、患者类型和户籍,与PSGE相关。努力可以集中在提高临床医生的意愿和能力,讨论治疗费用在临床遇到。政策制定者必须解决各级医院患者群体在医疗保健经验方面的差异,以推进公平、以患者为中心的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信