Role of endocervical curettage in detecting CIN2 + in postmenopausal women with persistent high-risk HPV and type 3 transformation zone.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Maria Teresa Bruno, Antonino Giovanni Cavallaro, Maria Chiara Sudano, Maria Caterina Fratto, Alessia Pagana, Maria Fiore, Gaetano Valenti
{"title":"Role of endocervical curettage in detecting CIN2 + in postmenopausal women with persistent high-risk HPV and type 3 transformation zone.","authors":"Maria Teresa Bruno, Antonino Giovanni Cavallaro, Maria Chiara Sudano, Maria Caterina Fratto, Alessia Pagana, Maria Fiore, Gaetano Valenti","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14868-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of endocervical curettage (ECC) in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in HPV-positive postmenopausal women with a type 3 transformation zone (TZ3) and to identify additional predictive factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted including 137 HPV-positive postmenopausal women who underwent colposcopy, ECC, and subsequent LEEP. Variables analyzed included age group, HPV genotype (16/18 vs. non-16/18), transformation zone type, cytology results, and ECC findings. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of CIN2 + confirmed by LEEP histology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CIN2 + prevalence was 27.7% (38/137); ≥CIN3 occurred in 26/137 (19.0%). In multivariable analysis, high-grade cytology (adjusted OR [aOR] 4.65; 95% CI 1.92-11.30; p < 0.001), TZ3 (aOR 3.05; 1.05-8.85; p = 0.040) and hrHPV non-16/18 (aOR 2.52; 1.08-5.90; p = 0.032) were independently associated with CIN2+, while age ≥ 51 years was not (aOR 1.28; 0.57-2.85; p = 0.55). Absolute risks of CIN2 + were 36.8% with non-16/18 vs. 16.4% with HPV16/18. ECC (cut-off CIN2+) yielded sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 77.8%, PPV 56.0% and NPV 88.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In postmenopausal women with persistent hrHPV, high-grade cytology and TZ3 are the main drivers of CIN2+ risk. ECC is most useful as a rule-out test (high NPV), whereas expedited diagnostic-therapeutic LEEP may be considered when ASC-H/HSIL coexists with TZ3 in women without fertility desire. The association between non-16/18 genotypes and CIN2+ observed here warrants confirmation in larger multicentre cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1486"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14868-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of endocervical curettage (ECC) in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) in HPV-positive postmenopausal women with a type 3 transformation zone (TZ3) and to identify additional predictive factors.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted including 137 HPV-positive postmenopausal women who underwent colposcopy, ECC, and subsequent LEEP. Variables analyzed included age group, HPV genotype (16/18 vs. non-16/18), transformation zone type, cytology results, and ECC findings. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of CIN2 + confirmed by LEEP histology.

Results: CIN2 + prevalence was 27.7% (38/137); ≥CIN3 occurred in 26/137 (19.0%). In multivariable analysis, high-grade cytology (adjusted OR [aOR] 4.65; 95% CI 1.92-11.30; p < 0.001), TZ3 (aOR 3.05; 1.05-8.85; p = 0.040) and hrHPV non-16/18 (aOR 2.52; 1.08-5.90; p = 0.032) were independently associated with CIN2+, while age ≥ 51 years was not (aOR 1.28; 0.57-2.85; p = 0.55). Absolute risks of CIN2 + were 36.8% with non-16/18 vs. 16.4% with HPV16/18. ECC (cut-off CIN2+) yielded sensitivity 73.7%, specificity 77.8%, PPV 56.0% and NPV 88.5%.

Conclusion: In postmenopausal women with persistent hrHPV, high-grade cytology and TZ3 are the main drivers of CIN2+ risk. ECC is most useful as a rule-out test (high NPV), whereas expedited diagnostic-therapeutic LEEP may be considered when ASC-H/HSIL coexists with TZ3 in women without fertility desire. The association between non-16/18 genotypes and CIN2+ observed here warrants confirmation in larger multicentre cohorts.

宫颈内膜刮除在绝经后持续高危HPV和3型转化区妇女中检测CIN2 +的作用。
背景:本研究旨在评估宫颈内膜刮除术(ECC)在检测宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或更严重(CIN2+)的hpv阳性绝经后妇女3型转化区(TZ3)的有效性并确定其他预测因素。方法:回顾性观察研究包括137名hpv阳性绝经后妇女,她们接受了阴道镜检查、ECC和LEEP。分析的变量包括年龄组、HPV基因型(16/18 vs.非16/18)、转化区类型、细胞学结果和ECC结果。通过单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,确定经LEEP组织学证实的CIN2 +的预测因素。结果:CIN2 +患病率为27.7% (38/137);≥CIN3的患者26/137(19.0%)。在多变量分析中,高级别细胞学(调整后OR [aOR] 4.65; 95% CI 1.92-11.30; p)结论:在绝经后持续性hrHPV患者中,高级别细胞学和TZ3是CIN2+风险的主要驱动因素。ECC作为排除测试(高NPV)最有用,而当ASC-H/HSIL与TZ3共存时,对于没有生育欲望的女性,可以考虑快速诊断治疗LEEP。本文观察到的非16/18基因型与CIN2+之间的关联值得在更大的多中心队列中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信