A phase III clinical trial of monthly minodronate in the treatment of Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Hao Zhang, Ya-Nan Huo, Ya-Wei Zhang, Zhi-Feng Cheng, Xiao-Jing Wang, Jun Chen, Qi-Fu Li, Xin-Hua Xiao, Li-Zhen Lan, Xin-Long Ma, Liu-Jun Fu, Xiao-Pan Chen, Ling-Qing Yuan, Fang-Jiang Xu, Li You, Jin-Luo Cheng, Dun Hong, Fei Hua, Li Mao, Guo-Xi Jin, Guan-Feng Yao, Ya-Jun Bing, Gui-Jie Xie, Ying Yang, Jin Xu, Ying Zhang, Wei Zhang, Yue Ding, Guo-Ping Cai, Hui-Min Zhou, Cheng-Yun Liu, Jian-Xiang Zhang, Zhong-Min Zhao, Bu-Jun Zhuang, Xiao Cheng, Zhen-Lin Zhang
{"title":"A phase III clinical trial of monthly minodronate in the treatment of Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.","authors":"Hao Zhang, Ya-Nan Huo, Ya-Wei Zhang, Zhi-Feng Cheng, Xiao-Jing Wang, Jun Chen, Qi-Fu Li, Xin-Hua Xiao, Li-Zhen Lan, Xin-Long Ma, Liu-Jun Fu, Xiao-Pan Chen, Ling-Qing Yuan, Fang-Jiang Xu, Li You, Jin-Luo Cheng, Dun Hong, Fei Hua, Li Mao, Guo-Xi Jin, Guan-Feng Yao, Ya-Jun Bing, Gui-Jie Xie, Ying Yang, Jin Xu, Ying Zhang, Wei Zhang, Yue Ding, Guo-Ping Cai, Hui-Min Zhou, Cheng-Yun Liu, Jian-Xiang Zhang, Zhong-Min Zhao, Bu-Jun Zhuang, Xiao Cheng, Zhen-Lin Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41401-025-01661-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To date, monthly oral bisphosphonates have not been available in China. In this randomized, double blind, positive-controlled, multicenter phase III clinical trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of monthly minodronate versus weekly alendronate in the treatment of Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 548 participants were screened across 31 study centers, of which 330 participants were randomized into two groups: the experimental group (n = 165) received oral minodronate (50 mg/tablet once every four weeks) and alendronate placebo (once weekly), while the positive control group (n = 165) received oral alendronate (70 mg/tablet once weekly) and minodronate placebo (once every four weeks) for a duration of 48 weeks. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at 24 and 48 weeks. At the end of treatments, the experimental group exhibited a mean increase (SD) in BMD above the baseline at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip of 4.61% (4.613%), 3.04% (4.034%) and 3.40% (3.569%), respectively, compared with those of 4.55% (3.753%), 1.86% (3.592%) and 2.30% (4.838%) in the control group. All improvements from the baseline in the two groups were statistically significant. The monthly minodronate did not cause new safety risks compared with alendronate. This study demonstrates that monthly minodronate administration is non-inferior to weekly alendronate in terms of therapeutic efficacy, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Furthermore, the monthly dosing schedule of minodronate may significantly enhance medication adherence among osteoporosis patients, potentially improving long-term treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":6942,"journal":{"name":"Acta Pharmacologica Sinica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Pharmacologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-025-01661-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, monthly oral bisphosphonates have not been available in China. In this randomized, double blind, positive-controlled, multicenter phase III clinical trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of monthly minodronate versus weekly alendronate in the treatment of Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. A total of 548 participants were screened across 31 study centers, of which 330 participants were randomized into two groups: the experimental group (n = 165) received oral minodronate (50 mg/tablet once every four weeks) and alendronate placebo (once weekly), while the positive control group (n = 165) received oral alendronate (70 mg/tablet once weekly) and minodronate placebo (once every four weeks) for a duration of 48 weeks. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at 24 and 48 weeks. At the end of treatments, the experimental group exhibited a mean increase (SD) in BMD above the baseline at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip of 4.61% (4.613%), 3.04% (4.034%) and 3.40% (3.569%), respectively, compared with those of 4.55% (3.753%), 1.86% (3.592%) and 2.30% (4.838%) in the control group. All improvements from the baseline in the two groups were statistically significant. The monthly minodronate did not cause new safety risks compared with alendronate. This study demonstrates that monthly minodronate administration is non-inferior to weekly alendronate in terms of therapeutic efficacy, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. Furthermore, the monthly dosing schedule of minodronate may significantly enhance medication adherence among osteoporosis patients, potentially improving long-term treatment outcomes.

米诺膦酸钠治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的III期临床研究
到目前为止,每月口服双膦酸盐在中国还没有。在这项随机、双盲、阳性对照、多中心III期临床试验中,我们比较了每月米诺膦酸钠与每周阿仑膦酸钠治疗中国绝经后骨质疏松症妇女的疗效和安全性。在31个研究中心共筛选了548名参与者,其中330名参与者被随机分为两组:实验组(n = 165)接受口服米诺膦酸钠(50 mg/片,每四周一次)和阿仑膦酸钠安慰剂(每周一次),而阳性对照组(n = 165)接受口服阿仑膦酸钠(70 mg/片,每周一次)和米诺膦酸钠安慰剂(每四周一次),持续48周。采用双能x线骨密度仪(DXA)在基线、24周和48周测量腰椎、股骨颈和全髋的骨密度(BMD)。治疗结束时,实验组腰椎、股骨颈和全髋的骨密度比基线平均增加4.61%(4.613%)、3.04%(4.034%)和3.40%(3.569%),对照组分别为4.55%(3.753%)、1.86%(3.592%)和2.30%(4.838%)。两组较基线的所有改善均具有统计学意义。与阿仑膦酸钠相比,每月服用米诺膦酸钠没有产生新的安全风险。这项研究表明,就治疗效果而言,每月服用米诺膦酸钠并不逊于每周服用阿仑膦酸钠,同时保持相当的安全性。此外,米诺膦酸钠的每月给药计划可能会显著提高骨质疏松症患者的药物依从性,潜在地改善长期治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica
Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
4365
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: APS (Acta Pharmacologica Sinica) welcomes submissions from diverse areas of pharmacology and the life sciences. While we encourage contributions across a broad spectrum, topics of particular interest include, but are not limited to: anticancer pharmacology, cardiovascular and pulmonary pharmacology, clinical pharmacology, drug discovery, gastrointestinal and hepatic pharmacology, genitourinary, renal, and endocrine pharmacology, immunopharmacology and inflammation, molecular and cellular pharmacology, neuropharmacology, pharmaceutics, and pharmacokinetics. Join us in sharing your research and insights in pharmacology and the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信