Lifecycle land decumulation strategies in a seventeenth-century rural community

IF 1.6 1区 历史学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Daniel R. Curtis, Bram van Besouw
{"title":"Lifecycle land decumulation strategies in a seventeenth-century rural community","authors":"Daniel R. Curtis,&nbsp;Bram van Besouw","doi":"10.1111/ehr.13408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Economic historians have tried to better understand how and why land was redistributed in rural communities, although our empirical insights have been limited by a lack of serial evidence for land distribution within the same locality across a long period. This article exploits the unusual survival of <i>Veldboeken</i> (field books), which allow a careful annual reconstruction of land distribution within an unremarkable seventeenth-century village in the south of the modern-day Netherlands. We show that, despite high levels of dynamism in the local land markets, including high and changing levels of leasehold, varying and flexible tenancies, and frequent transfers of land between parties, the overall aggregate distribution of land did not change very much over time. Employing a systematic lifecycle analysis of active land-market participants, we advance a broader concept of pre-industrial ‘decumulation’ – where landowners and land users used adaptive mechanisms within the land market to not just consolidate land but also work out ways of getting rid of it and achieve optimal (and often smaller) farms and estates. Accordingly, we do not find any social logic or natural tendency towards accumulation, consolidation, and greater inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":47868,"journal":{"name":"Economic History Review","volume":"78 4","pages":"1088-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ehr.13408","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ehr.13408","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economic historians have tried to better understand how and why land was redistributed in rural communities, although our empirical insights have been limited by a lack of serial evidence for land distribution within the same locality across a long period. This article exploits the unusual survival of Veldboeken (field books), which allow a careful annual reconstruction of land distribution within an unremarkable seventeenth-century village in the south of the modern-day Netherlands. We show that, despite high levels of dynamism in the local land markets, including high and changing levels of leasehold, varying and flexible tenancies, and frequent transfers of land between parties, the overall aggregate distribution of land did not change very much over time. Employing a systematic lifecycle analysis of active land-market participants, we advance a broader concept of pre-industrial ‘decumulation’ – where landowners and land users used adaptive mechanisms within the land market to not just consolidate land but also work out ways of getting rid of it and achieve optimal (and often smaller) farms and estates. Accordingly, we do not find any social logic or natural tendency towards accumulation, consolidation, and greater inequality.

Abstract Image

17世纪乡村社区的生命周期土地积累策略
经济历史学家试图更好地理解农村社区土地重新分配的方式和原因,尽管我们的经验见解由于缺乏长期同一地区土地分配的连续证据而受到限制。这篇文章利用了Veldboeken(田野书籍)的不寻常的生存,它允许在现代荷兰南部一个不起眼的17世纪村庄中每年仔细重建土地分布。我们的研究表明,尽管当地土地市场具有高度的活力,包括高水平和不断变化的租赁,多变和灵活的租赁,以及各方之间频繁的土地转让,但随着时间的推移,土地的总体总分布并没有发生太大变化。通过对活跃的土地市场参与者进行系统的生命周期分析,我们提出了一个更广泛的工业化前“去积累”概念——土地所有者和土地使用者在土地市场中使用适应性机制,不仅巩固土地,而且找到摆脱土地的方法,实现最佳(通常是较小的)农场和庄园。因此,我们没有发现任何社会逻辑或自然倾向于积累、巩固和更大的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: The Economic History Review is published quarterly and each volume contains over 800 pages. It is an invaluable source of information and is available free to members of the Economic History Society. Publishing reviews of books, periodicals and information technology, The Review will keep anyone interested in economic and social history abreast of current developments in the subject. It aims at broad coverage of themes of economic and social change, including the intellectual, political and cultural implications of these changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信